{"title":"考验与磨难:开发人工智能,从外周血涂片中筛查疟原虫","authors":"Shilpi Saxena , Parikshit Sanyal , Mukul Bajpai , Rajat Prakash , Shiv Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Detection of malaria parasite from blood smears remains the gold standard for confirmation of diagnosis. Screening blood smears for malaria parasite has a sensitivity of 75 %, and requires intensive training of the laboratory technician. In the present study, we have attempted to develop an artificial intelligence to automate the process of malaria parasite detection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We acquired 352 images of Leishman–Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears, containing either normal red blood cells<span> (RBCs) or parasitised RBCs. With a trial and error approach, we developed five deep learning models: (A) Naive deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for trophozoites, (B) Modified Inception V3 pretrained neural network (C) Combination of model A and B, (D) Segmentation of cells from the images through Watershed Transform and naive tri-class DCNN (normal RBCs, parasitised RBCs, WBC/platelets), and (E) A naive DCNN model to detect ring forms. The images were randomly split into training and test sets and training was imparted on all the models. After completion of training, performance of each model was assessed on the test set.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was seen in model D (85 % and 94 %, respectively) in detecting parasites; in addition to trophozoites, model D could also detect ring forms. The performance of model A, B & C suffered from lack of either sensitivity or specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present study represents the first step towards development of a complete module for screening malaria parasites from automated microphotography/whole slide images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39387,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal Armed Forces India","volume":"81 3","pages":"Pages 291-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trials and tribulations: Developing an artificial intelligence for screening malaria parasite from peripheral blood smears\",\"authors\":\"Shilpi Saxena , Parikshit Sanyal , Mukul Bajpai , Rajat Prakash , Shiv Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Detection of malaria parasite from blood smears remains the gold standard for confirmation of diagnosis. Screening blood smears for malaria parasite has a sensitivity of 75 %, and requires intensive training of the laboratory technician. In the present study, we have attempted to develop an artificial intelligence to automate the process of malaria parasite detection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We acquired 352 images of Leishman–Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears, containing either normal red blood cells<span> (RBCs) or parasitised RBCs. With a trial and error approach, we developed five deep learning models: (A) Naive deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for trophozoites, (B) Modified Inception V3 pretrained neural network (C) Combination of model A and B, (D) Segmentation of cells from the images through Watershed Transform and naive tri-class DCNN (normal RBCs, parasitised RBCs, WBC/platelets), and (E) A naive DCNN model to detect ring forms. The images were randomly split into training and test sets and training was imparted on all the models. After completion of training, performance of each model was assessed on the test set.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was seen in model D (85 % and 94 %, respectively) in detecting parasites; in addition to trophozoites, model D could also detect ring forms. The performance of model A, B & C suffered from lack of either sensitivity or specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present study represents the first step towards development of a complete module for screening malaria parasites from automated microphotography/whole slide images.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal Armed Forces India\",\"volume\":\"81 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 291-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal Armed Forces India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377123723001879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal Armed Forces India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377123723001879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trials and tribulations: Developing an artificial intelligence for screening malaria parasite from peripheral blood smears
Background
Detection of malaria parasite from blood smears remains the gold standard for confirmation of diagnosis. Screening blood smears for malaria parasite has a sensitivity of 75 %, and requires intensive training of the laboratory technician. In the present study, we have attempted to develop an artificial intelligence to automate the process of malaria parasite detection.
Methods
We acquired 352 images of Leishman–Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears, containing either normal red blood cells (RBCs) or parasitised RBCs. With a trial and error approach, we developed five deep learning models: (A) Naive deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for trophozoites, (B) Modified Inception V3 pretrained neural network (C) Combination of model A and B, (D) Segmentation of cells from the images through Watershed Transform and naive tri-class DCNN (normal RBCs, parasitised RBCs, WBC/platelets), and (E) A naive DCNN model to detect ring forms. The images were randomly split into training and test sets and training was imparted on all the models. After completion of training, performance of each model was assessed on the test set.
Results
Overall, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was seen in model D (85 % and 94 %, respectively) in detecting parasites; in addition to trophozoites, model D could also detect ring forms. The performance of model A, B & C suffered from lack of either sensitivity or specificity.
Conclusion
The present study represents the first step towards development of a complete module for screening malaria parasites from automated microphotography/whole slide images.
期刊介绍:
This journal was conceived in 1945 as the Journal of Indian Army Medical Corps. Col DR Thapar was the first Editor who published it on behalf of Lt. Gen Gordon Wilson, the then Director of Medical Services in India. Over the years the journal has achieved various milestones. Presently it is published in Vancouver style, printed on offset, and has a distribution exceeding 5000 per issue. It is published in January, April, July and October each year.