在宗教法院调解解决子女监护权诉讼中适用第 130 条第 2 款 "范达丁行为 "的司法影响

Ahmad Syauqy Alfan
{"title":"在宗教法院调解解决子女监护权诉讼中适用第 130 条第 2 款 \"范达丁行为 \"的司法影响","authors":"Ahmad Syauqy Alfan","doi":"10.33627/es.v6i2.1561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explain the juridical review of various influencing factors, as well as the urgency of implementing the Peace Deed in resolving Child Custody Lawsuits through Mediation in the Religious Courts by studying the decisions of the Religious Courts in West Nusa Tenggara Province. This type of research is library research. The approach used is normative juridical which also uses a statutory approach, case study and conceptual approach. Data collection techniques were carried out using legal research studies. The primary data for this research is Article 130 HIR, Article 154 RBg KUHPer and PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures. The secondary data is various literature that is relevant to this research. The results of this research are that there is inconsistency and disharmony between two government regulations regarding the implementation of the Peace Deed in the Religious Courts which involves two regulations and laws, namely Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBg with PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures. The inconsistency and disharmony between the two government regulations has resulted in overlapping decisions in the Religious Courts, especially in the case of child custody claims which are listed in several decisions that have been issued by the Religious Courts in several regions in West Nusa Tenggara Province","PeriodicalId":505013,"journal":{"name":"EDU SOCIATA ( JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIOLOGI)","volume":"1410 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implikasi Yuridis Penerapan Pasal 130 Ayat (2) Tentang Acte Van Dading Dalam Penyelesaian Mediasi Gugatan Hak Asuh Anak Di Pengadilan Agama\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Syauqy Alfan\",\"doi\":\"10.33627/es.v6i2.1561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to explain the juridical review of various influencing factors, as well as the urgency of implementing the Peace Deed in resolving Child Custody Lawsuits through Mediation in the Religious Courts by studying the decisions of the Religious Courts in West Nusa Tenggara Province. This type of research is library research. The approach used is normative juridical which also uses a statutory approach, case study and conceptual approach. Data collection techniques were carried out using legal research studies. The primary data for this research is Article 130 HIR, Article 154 RBg KUHPer and PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures. The secondary data is various literature that is relevant to this research. The results of this research are that there is inconsistency and disharmony between two government regulations regarding the implementation of the Peace Deed in the Religious Courts which involves two regulations and laws, namely Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBg with PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures. The inconsistency and disharmony between the two government regulations has resulted in overlapping decisions in the Religious Courts, especially in the case of child custody claims which are listed in several decisions that have been issued by the Religious Courts in several regions in West Nusa Tenggara Province\",\"PeriodicalId\":505013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDU SOCIATA ( JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIOLOGI)\",\"volume\":\"1410 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDU SOCIATA ( JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIOLOGI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33627/es.v6i2.1561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDU SOCIATA ( JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIOLOGI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33627/es.v6i2.1561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过研究西努沙登加拉省宗教法院的判决,解释对各种影响因素的司法审查,以及在宗教法院通过调解解决子女监护权诉讼时实施和约的紧迫性。这类研究属于图书馆研究。使用的方法是规范法学,同时也使用法定方法、案例研究和概念方法。数据收集技术采用法律研究方法。本研究的主要数据是《匈牙利人权法》第 130 条、《大韩民国人权法典》第 154 条和《关于调解程序的 PERMA》(2016 年第 1 号)。二手数据是与本研究相关的各种文献。本研究的结果表明,关于在宗教法院执行和约的两个政府法规之间存在不一致和不协调,这涉及两个法规和法律,即第130 HIR条和第154 RBg条,以及关于调解程序的2016年第1号PERMA。两个政府法规之间的不一致和不协调导致宗教法院的裁决重叠,特别是在西努沙登加拉省多个地区的宗教法院已发布的若干裁决中列出的儿童监护权索赔案中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implikasi Yuridis Penerapan Pasal 130 Ayat (2) Tentang Acte Van Dading Dalam Penyelesaian Mediasi Gugatan Hak Asuh Anak Di Pengadilan Agama
This research aims to explain the juridical review of various influencing factors, as well as the urgency of implementing the Peace Deed in resolving Child Custody Lawsuits through Mediation in the Religious Courts by studying the decisions of the Religious Courts in West Nusa Tenggara Province. This type of research is library research. The approach used is normative juridical which also uses a statutory approach, case study and conceptual approach. Data collection techniques were carried out using legal research studies. The primary data for this research is Article 130 HIR, Article 154 RBg KUHPer and PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures. The secondary data is various literature that is relevant to this research. The results of this research are that there is inconsistency and disharmony between two government regulations regarding the implementation of the Peace Deed in the Religious Courts which involves two regulations and laws, namely Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBg with PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures. The inconsistency and disharmony between the two government regulations has resulted in overlapping decisions in the Religious Courts, especially in the case of child custody claims which are listed in several decisions that have been issued by the Religious Courts in several regions in West Nusa Tenggara Province
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信