从配置角度看区块链平台的设计要素和用户治理参与

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Rongen “Sophia” Zhang, Balasubramaniam Ramesh
{"title":"从配置角度看区块链平台的设计要素和用户治理参与","authors":"Rongen “Sophia” Zhang,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Ramesh","doi":"10.1111/isj.12494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blockchain technology offers the potential to create an open, decentralised governance structure that empowers stakeholders to participate in decentralised engagement. However, how blockchain platforms configure their design elements to establish and maintain decentralised systems with high levels of user governance engagement requires further research. This study investigates the key design elements of blockchain platforms and their ideal configurations for promoting user governance engagement. Due to the complex and interdependent nature of the design elements, we adopt a configurational perspective accompanied by a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to uncover complex nonlinear relationships among key conditions that are relevant to decentralised governance. Our research identifies five key design elements that facilitate distributed governance (<i>Access to decision rights</i>, <i>Process visibility</i>, <i>Protocol automation</i>, <i>Incentives for developers/miners</i>, and <i>Incentives for other stakeholders</i>) based on existing blockchain governance literature. We analyse 14 unique blockchain platform cases that adopted on-chain governance. Our fsQCA results reveal three ideal types of blockchain governance configurations that are sufficient for high generative user governance engagement: <i>Centralised incentive model</i>, <i>Impartial incentive model</i>, and <i>Automation-driven model</i>, whereas achieving high evaluative governance engagement requires the presence of all the design elements (<i>Comprehensive model</i>). Also, we found <i>Access to decision rights</i> and <i>Protocol automation</i> are necessary conditions for generative governance engagement, and <i>Access to decision right</i>s together with <i>Process visibility</i> is a combined necessary condition for evaluative governance engagement. Relevant theoretical and practical implications for platform designers as well as methodological implications for applying QCA to emerging IS phenomena are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12494","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A configurational perspective on design elements and user governance engagement in blockchain platforms\",\"authors\":\"Rongen “Sophia” Zhang,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Ramesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/isj.12494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Blockchain technology offers the potential to create an open, decentralised governance structure that empowers stakeholders to participate in decentralised engagement. However, how blockchain platforms configure their design elements to establish and maintain decentralised systems with high levels of user governance engagement requires further research. This study investigates the key design elements of blockchain platforms and their ideal configurations for promoting user governance engagement. Due to the complex and interdependent nature of the design elements, we adopt a configurational perspective accompanied by a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to uncover complex nonlinear relationships among key conditions that are relevant to decentralised governance. Our research identifies five key design elements that facilitate distributed governance (<i>Access to decision rights</i>, <i>Process visibility</i>, <i>Protocol automation</i>, <i>Incentives for developers/miners</i>, and <i>Incentives for other stakeholders</i>) based on existing blockchain governance literature. We analyse 14 unique blockchain platform cases that adopted on-chain governance. Our fsQCA results reveal three ideal types of blockchain governance configurations that are sufficient for high generative user governance engagement: <i>Centralised incentive model</i>, <i>Impartial incentive model</i>, and <i>Automation-driven model</i>, whereas achieving high evaluative governance engagement requires the presence of all the design elements (<i>Comprehensive model</i>). Also, we found <i>Access to decision rights</i> and <i>Protocol automation</i> are necessary conditions for generative governance engagement, and <i>Access to decision right</i>s together with <i>Process visibility</i> is a combined necessary condition for evaluative governance engagement. Relevant theoretical and practical implications for platform designers as well as methodological implications for applying QCA to emerging IS phenomena are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12494\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区块链技术为创建开放、去中心化的治理结构提供了潜力,使利益相关者能够参与去中心化的参与。然而,区块链平台如何配置其设计元素,以建立和维护具有高水平用户治理参与的去中心化系统,还需要进一步研究。本研究调查了区块链平台的关键设计元素及其促进用户治理参与的理想配置。由于设计要素的复杂性和相互依赖性,我们采用了配置视角,并辅以模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA),以揭示与去中心化治理相关的关键条件之间的复杂非线性关系。我们的研究以现有的区块链治理文献为基础,确定了促进分布式治理的五个关键设计要素(决策权的获取、流程可见性、协议自动化、对开发者/用户的激励以及对其他利益相关者的激励)。我们分析了 14 个采用链上治理的独特区块链平台案例。我们的 fsQCA 结果揭示了三种理想的区块链治理配置类型,它们足以产生较高的用户治理参与度:中心化激励模式、公正激励模式和自动化驱动模式,而要实现高评价性治理参与度,则需要具备所有设计要素(综合模式)。此外,我们还发现获取决策权和协议自动化是生成性治理参与的必要条件,而获取决策权和流程可见性是评价性治理参与的综合必要条件。我们讨论了对平台设计者的相关理论和实践影响,以及将 QCA 应用于新兴 IS 现象的方法论影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A configurational perspective on design elements and user governance engagement in blockchain platforms

A configurational perspective on design elements and user governance engagement in blockchain platforms

Blockchain technology offers the potential to create an open, decentralised governance structure that empowers stakeholders to participate in decentralised engagement. However, how blockchain platforms configure their design elements to establish and maintain decentralised systems with high levels of user governance engagement requires further research. This study investigates the key design elements of blockchain platforms and their ideal configurations for promoting user governance engagement. Due to the complex and interdependent nature of the design elements, we adopt a configurational perspective accompanied by a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to uncover complex nonlinear relationships among key conditions that are relevant to decentralised governance. Our research identifies five key design elements that facilitate distributed governance (Access to decision rights, Process visibility, Protocol automation, Incentives for developers/miners, and Incentives for other stakeholders) based on existing blockchain governance literature. We analyse 14 unique blockchain platform cases that adopted on-chain governance. Our fsQCA results reveal three ideal types of blockchain governance configurations that are sufficient for high generative user governance engagement: Centralised incentive model, Impartial incentive model, and Automation-driven model, whereas achieving high evaluative governance engagement requires the presence of all the design elements (Comprehensive model). Also, we found Access to decision rights and Protocol automation are necessary conditions for generative governance engagement, and Access to decision rights together with Process visibility is a combined necessary condition for evaluative governance engagement. Relevant theoretical and practical implications for platform designers as well as methodological implications for applying QCA to emerging IS phenomena are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信