蔑视真相:对 COVID-19 事件发生时阴谋论信仰的务实研究

Gaetano Falco
{"title":"蔑视真相:对 COVID-19 事件发生时阴谋论信仰的务实研究","authors":"Gaetano Falco","doi":"10.7358/lcm-2023-002-falg","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, a multitude of conspiracy theories have started floating around which ascribe the origins of the virus to a range of causes. Against this backdrop, the chapter aims at demonstrating how conspiracy beliefs are linguistically created in news and social media. For this purpose, adopting an approach which combines Grice’s Cooperative Maxims with the principles of Cognitive Linguistics, our study delves into a set of documents available on free online fact-checking organizations as well as Tweets, Facebook posts and speeches released by influential voices and ordinary people. The research demonstrates how unconventional metaphors and metonymies, unexpected syntactic patterns and dispreferred windowing of attention, as well as other linguistic devices, contribute to flouting or violating the Maxims of Quantity, Quality, Relevance and Manner (Grice 1975; 1989) thus constructing false claims and mis-/dis-information.","PeriodicalId":502965,"journal":{"name":"Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal)","volume":"19 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flouting the Truth: A Pragmatic Study of Conspiracy Beliefs at the Time of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Gaetano Falco\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/lcm-2023-002-falg\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, a multitude of conspiracy theories have started floating around which ascribe the origins of the virus to a range of causes. Against this backdrop, the chapter aims at demonstrating how conspiracy beliefs are linguistically created in news and social media. For this purpose, adopting an approach which combines Grice’s Cooperative Maxims with the principles of Cognitive Linguistics, our study delves into a set of documents available on free online fact-checking organizations as well as Tweets, Facebook posts and speeches released by influential voices and ordinary people. The research demonstrates how unconventional metaphors and metonymies, unexpected syntactic patterns and dispreferred windowing of attention, as well as other linguistic devices, contribute to flouting or violating the Maxims of Quantity, Quality, Relevance and Manner (Grice 1975; 1989) thus constructing false claims and mis-/dis-information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal)\",\"volume\":\"19 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2023-002-falg\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2023-002-falg","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 自 2019 年 12 月 COVID-19 大流行爆发以来,大量阴谋论开始流传,将病毒的起源归结为一系列原因。在此背景下,本章旨在说明阴谋论信念是如何在新闻和社交媒体中产生的。为此,我们采用了一种结合格莱斯合作格言和认知语言学原理的方法,深入研究了免费在线事实核查机构提供的一系列文件,以及有影响力的声音和普通人发布的推文、Facebook 帖子和演讲。研究表明,非常规的隐喻和转喻、意想不到的句法模式和分散注意力的窗口,以及其他语言手段,是如何蔑视或违反数量、质量、相关性和方式原则(格莱斯,1975 年;1989 年),从而构建虚假主张和错误/不实信息的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flouting the Truth: A Pragmatic Study of Conspiracy Beliefs at the Time of COVID-19
Abstract Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, a multitude of conspiracy theories have started floating around which ascribe the origins of the virus to a range of causes. Against this backdrop, the chapter aims at demonstrating how conspiracy beliefs are linguistically created in news and social media. For this purpose, adopting an approach which combines Grice’s Cooperative Maxims with the principles of Cognitive Linguistics, our study delves into a set of documents available on free online fact-checking organizations as well as Tweets, Facebook posts and speeches released by influential voices and ordinary people. The research demonstrates how unconventional metaphors and metonymies, unexpected syntactic patterns and dispreferred windowing of attention, as well as other linguistic devices, contribute to flouting or violating the Maxims of Quantity, Quality, Relevance and Manner (Grice 1975; 1989) thus constructing false claims and mis-/dis-information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信