在欠分辨离格玻尔兹曼方法中实现湍流热对流的随机亚网格尺度建模

PAMM Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1002/pamm.202300223
Sai Ravi Gupta Polasanapalli, M. Klein, Heiko Schmidt
{"title":"在欠分辨离格玻尔兹曼方法中实现湍流热对流的随机亚网格尺度建模","authors":"Sai Ravi Gupta Polasanapalli, M. Klein, Heiko Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/pamm.202300223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A characteristic‐based Off‐Lattice Boltzmann Method (OLBM) and a stochastic One‐Dimensional Turbulence (ODT) model is utilized for numerical simulation of turbulent thermal convection. Standalone ODT results for low‐order statistics are compared with those from various eddy‐viscosity‐based subgrid‐scale models utilized in Large‐Eddy Simulations (LES) with OLBM. The predictive capabilities of both approaches are discussed by comparison with available reference Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) results. All turbulence models are able to predicted the mean temperature, but fail to fully capture fluctuations. While the OLBM aims to represent large‐scale structures, it misses some constitutional small‐scale fluctuations. By contrast, the reduced‐order ODT model captures small‐scale fluctuations in the vicinity of the wall, but cannot resolve the organized bulk flow. Here, the modeling capabilities of both OLBM and ODT as standalone tools are discussed. On this basis, a strategy for the incorporation of ODT as wall model in OLBM is suggested.","PeriodicalId":510616,"journal":{"name":"PAMM","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards stochastic subgrid‐scale modeling of turbulent thermal convection in an under‐resolved off‐lattice Boltzmann method\",\"authors\":\"Sai Ravi Gupta Polasanapalli, M. Klein, Heiko Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pamm.202300223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A characteristic‐based Off‐Lattice Boltzmann Method (OLBM) and a stochastic One‐Dimensional Turbulence (ODT) model is utilized for numerical simulation of turbulent thermal convection. Standalone ODT results for low‐order statistics are compared with those from various eddy‐viscosity‐based subgrid‐scale models utilized in Large‐Eddy Simulations (LES) with OLBM. The predictive capabilities of both approaches are discussed by comparison with available reference Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) results. All turbulence models are able to predicted the mean temperature, but fail to fully capture fluctuations. While the OLBM aims to represent large‐scale structures, it misses some constitutional small‐scale fluctuations. By contrast, the reduced‐order ODT model captures small‐scale fluctuations in the vicinity of the wall, but cannot resolve the organized bulk flow. Here, the modeling capabilities of both OLBM and ODT as standalone tools are discussed. On this basis, a strategy for the incorporation of ODT as wall model in OLBM is suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAMM\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAMM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202300223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAMM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202300223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用基于特征的非晶格玻尔兹曼法(OLBM)和随机一维湍流(ODT)模型对湍流热对流进行数值模拟。将低阶统计的独立 ODT 结果与 OLBM 大尺度埃迪模拟 (LES) 中使用的各种基于涡粘度的子网格尺度模型的结果进行了比较。通过与现有的直接数值模拟(DNS)参考结果进行比较,讨论了这两种方法的预测能力。所有湍流模型都能预测平均温度,但无法完全捕捉波动。虽然 OLBM 的目标是代表大尺度结构,但它忽略了一些宪法规定的小尺度波动。相比之下,降阶 ODT 模型能捕捉到壁面附近的小尺度波动,但无法解析有组织的体流。这里讨论了 OLBM 和 ODT 作为独立工具的建模能力。在此基础上,提出了将 ODT 作为壁模型纳入 OLBM 的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards stochastic subgrid‐scale modeling of turbulent thermal convection in an under‐resolved off‐lattice Boltzmann method
A characteristic‐based Off‐Lattice Boltzmann Method (OLBM) and a stochastic One‐Dimensional Turbulence (ODT) model is utilized for numerical simulation of turbulent thermal convection. Standalone ODT results for low‐order statistics are compared with those from various eddy‐viscosity‐based subgrid‐scale models utilized in Large‐Eddy Simulations (LES) with OLBM. The predictive capabilities of both approaches are discussed by comparison with available reference Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) results. All turbulence models are able to predicted the mean temperature, but fail to fully capture fluctuations. While the OLBM aims to represent large‐scale structures, it misses some constitutional small‐scale fluctuations. By contrast, the reduced‐order ODT model captures small‐scale fluctuations in the vicinity of the wall, but cannot resolve the organized bulk flow. Here, the modeling capabilities of both OLBM and ODT as standalone tools are discussed. On this basis, a strategy for the incorporation of ODT as wall model in OLBM is suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信