益生菌对牙周病的影响:一项 Meta 分析研究

Norzawani Jaffar, Nur Atikah Segu Jalaluddin
{"title":"益生菌对牙周病的影响:一项 Meta 分析研究","authors":"Norzawani Jaffar, Nur Atikah Segu Jalaluddin","doi":"10.37231/ajmb.2023.1.s.693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periodontal disease remains a major worldwide oral health problem, affecting about 538 million people all around the globe. It is caused by changes in local microflora inhabiting the plaque biofilm from Gram-positive to Gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacteria, destroying the periodontal membrane and surrounding alveolar bone. Mechanical debridement of biofilm and antibiotics has been used as conventional therapy for gingivitis and periodontitis. However, the uncertain efficacy of the current treatment leads to using probiotics as a promising strategy to combat the periodontal pathogen. An antibiotic application might contribute to antimicrobial resistance and environmental pollution due to non-degradable residue. Probiotics could be an alternative treatment for periodontal disease. This meta-analysis study aims to assess the potential of probiotic bacteria to reduce the magnitude of the inflammatory response, especially in the pro-inflammatory cytokines. Electronic databases such as Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed were used to search for related articles up to May 2021. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials were included in the study, whereby the concentration of IL-1β and TNF-α were chosen as the main outcome variables. Independent screening resulted in four eligible publications being included in the meta-analysis. However, the overall mean difference for the concentration of IL-1β (MD: -0.32; 95% CI: -1.88, 1.25; P = 0.69) and TNF-α (MD: 0; 95% CI: -0.20, 0.20; P= 0.98) did not show any statistical significance difference between probiotic and placebo groups. Therefore, the study results demonstrated weak evidence to support the usage of probiotics in reducing the magnitude of inflammatory response in patients with periodontal disease. Smaller sample sizes and limited available data may contribute to this conclusion. Hence, future randomized controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes and a longer intervention period must be considered to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in periodontal disease.","PeriodicalId":189900,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine","volume":"50 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probiotic Effect on Periodontal Disease: A Meta-Analysis Study\",\"authors\":\"Norzawani Jaffar, Nur Atikah Segu Jalaluddin\",\"doi\":\"10.37231/ajmb.2023.1.s.693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Periodontal disease remains a major worldwide oral health problem, affecting about 538 million people all around the globe. It is caused by changes in local microflora inhabiting the plaque biofilm from Gram-positive to Gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacteria, destroying the periodontal membrane and surrounding alveolar bone. Mechanical debridement of biofilm and antibiotics has been used as conventional therapy for gingivitis and periodontitis. However, the uncertain efficacy of the current treatment leads to using probiotics as a promising strategy to combat the periodontal pathogen. An antibiotic application might contribute to antimicrobial resistance and environmental pollution due to non-degradable residue. Probiotics could be an alternative treatment for periodontal disease. This meta-analysis study aims to assess the potential of probiotic bacteria to reduce the magnitude of the inflammatory response, especially in the pro-inflammatory cytokines. Electronic databases such as Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed were used to search for related articles up to May 2021. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials were included in the study, whereby the concentration of IL-1β and TNF-α were chosen as the main outcome variables. Independent screening resulted in four eligible publications being included in the meta-analysis. However, the overall mean difference for the concentration of IL-1β (MD: -0.32; 95% CI: -1.88, 1.25; P = 0.69) and TNF-α (MD: 0; 95% CI: -0.20, 0.20; P= 0.98) did not show any statistical significance difference between probiotic and placebo groups. Therefore, the study results demonstrated weak evidence to support the usage of probiotics in reducing the magnitude of inflammatory response in patients with periodontal disease. Smaller sample sizes and limited available data may contribute to this conclusion. Hence, future randomized controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes and a longer intervention period must be considered to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in periodontal disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37231/ajmb.2023.1.s.693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37231/ajmb.2023.1.s.693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙周病仍然是世界性的主要口腔健康问题,影响着全球约 5.38 亿人。牙周病是由于栖息在牙菌斑生物膜上的局部微生物菌群从革兰氏阳性菌变为革兰氏阴性兼性厌氧菌,破坏了牙周膜和周围的牙槽骨。机械清除生物膜和抗生素一直是治疗牙龈炎和牙周炎的传统方法。然而,由于目前的治疗方法疗效不确定,因此使用益生菌作为抗击牙周病原体的一种很有前途的策略。抗生素的应用可能会导致抗菌药耐药性,而且由于残留物不可降解,还会造成环境污染。益生菌可作为牙周病的替代治疗方法。这项荟萃分析研究旨在评估益生菌降低炎症反应,尤其是促炎细胞因子反应程度的潜力。本研究使用 Google Scholar、Science Direct 和 PubMed 等电子数据库搜索截至 2021 年 5 月的相关文章。研究纳入了随机对照临床试验(RCT)或对照临床试验,并选择IL-1β和TNF-α的浓度作为主要结果变量。通过独立筛选,有四篇符合条件的文献被纳入荟萃分析。然而,IL-1β(MD:-0.32;95% CI:-1.88,1.25;P= 0.69)和 TNF-α(MD:0;95% CI:-0.20,0.20;P= 0.98)浓度的总体平均差异在益生菌组和安慰剂组之间没有显示出任何统计学意义上的差异。因此,研究结果显示,支持使用益生菌降低牙周病患者炎症反应程度的证据不足。样本量较小和可用数据有限可能是得出这一结论的原因。因此,今后必须考虑进行样本量更大、干预时间更长的随机对照临床试验,以评估益生菌对牙周病的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probiotic Effect on Periodontal Disease: A Meta-Analysis Study
Periodontal disease remains a major worldwide oral health problem, affecting about 538 million people all around the globe. It is caused by changes in local microflora inhabiting the plaque biofilm from Gram-positive to Gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacteria, destroying the periodontal membrane and surrounding alveolar bone. Mechanical debridement of biofilm and antibiotics has been used as conventional therapy for gingivitis and periodontitis. However, the uncertain efficacy of the current treatment leads to using probiotics as a promising strategy to combat the periodontal pathogen. An antibiotic application might contribute to antimicrobial resistance and environmental pollution due to non-degradable residue. Probiotics could be an alternative treatment for periodontal disease. This meta-analysis study aims to assess the potential of probiotic bacteria to reduce the magnitude of the inflammatory response, especially in the pro-inflammatory cytokines. Electronic databases such as Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed were used to search for related articles up to May 2021. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials were included in the study, whereby the concentration of IL-1β and TNF-α were chosen as the main outcome variables. Independent screening resulted in four eligible publications being included in the meta-analysis. However, the overall mean difference for the concentration of IL-1β (MD: -0.32; 95% CI: -1.88, 1.25; P = 0.69) and TNF-α (MD: 0; 95% CI: -0.20, 0.20; P= 0.98) did not show any statistical significance difference between probiotic and placebo groups. Therefore, the study results demonstrated weak evidence to support the usage of probiotics in reducing the magnitude of inflammatory response in patients with periodontal disease. Smaller sample sizes and limited available data may contribute to this conclusion. Hence, future randomized controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes and a longer intervention period must be considered to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in periodontal disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信