生物基单宁泡沫:在轻质夹芯板中比较生物基丹宁泡沫与聚氨酯泡沫的物理和热反应

Compounds Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.3390/compounds4010001
M. B. B. Rodrigues, Ronan Correa, P. H. G. De Cademartori, Ana C. R. Ribeiro, Rodrigo Coldebella, R. Delucis, Nayara Lunkes, A. Missio
{"title":"生物基单宁泡沫:在轻质夹芯板中比较生物基丹宁泡沫与聚氨酯泡沫的物理和热反应","authors":"M. B. B. Rodrigues, Ronan Correa, P. H. G. De Cademartori, Ana C. R. Ribeiro, Rodrigo Coldebella, R. Delucis, Nayara Lunkes, A. Missio","doi":"10.3390/compounds4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rigid polyurethane foams are the better-performing material for the most common insulation purposes, like sandwich panels. Nevertheless, they are highly flammable materials, release toxic gases, and are manufactured from fossil sources. As an alternative, tannin foams are bio-based materials that work as innovative alternatives thanks to their great fire resistance, as well as lower smoke and harmful gases emissions. In the present study, lab-made foams of both materials were compared through morphology, thermal and fire degradation, mechanical properties, and water affinity in order to fill the technological gap between them and their related sandwich panels. It was observed that tannin foams are still relatively inhomogeneous (since formaldehyde was not used) and present a high affinity for water but have higher thermal and fire resistance. The flat compression strength of the polyurethane sandwiches was greater than that of tannin sandwiches (3.61 and 3.09 MPa, respectively) thanks, mainly, to the crosslinking degree difference between the resins. Also, tannin foams presented a lower weight loss (−70.684% lower weight loss in flammability tests than polyurethane foams) and the ability to self-extinguish the flame. Therefore, sandwich panels with tannin foam cores could be successful materials in areas that require protection against fire, such as the building engineering and automotive industries.","PeriodicalId":10621,"journal":{"name":"Compounds","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bio-Based Tannin Foams: Comparing Their Physical and Thermal Response to Polyurethane Foams in Lightweight Sandwich Panels\",\"authors\":\"M. B. B. Rodrigues, Ronan Correa, P. H. G. De Cademartori, Ana C. R. Ribeiro, Rodrigo Coldebella, R. Delucis, Nayara Lunkes, A. Missio\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/compounds4010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rigid polyurethane foams are the better-performing material for the most common insulation purposes, like sandwich panels. Nevertheless, they are highly flammable materials, release toxic gases, and are manufactured from fossil sources. As an alternative, tannin foams are bio-based materials that work as innovative alternatives thanks to their great fire resistance, as well as lower smoke and harmful gases emissions. In the present study, lab-made foams of both materials were compared through morphology, thermal and fire degradation, mechanical properties, and water affinity in order to fill the technological gap between them and their related sandwich panels. It was observed that tannin foams are still relatively inhomogeneous (since formaldehyde was not used) and present a high affinity for water but have higher thermal and fire resistance. The flat compression strength of the polyurethane sandwiches was greater than that of tannin sandwiches (3.61 and 3.09 MPa, respectively) thanks, mainly, to the crosslinking degree difference between the resins. Also, tannin foams presented a lower weight loss (−70.684% lower weight loss in flammability tests than polyurethane foams) and the ability to self-extinguish the flame. Therefore, sandwich panels with tannin foam cores could be successful materials in areas that require protection against fire, such as the building engineering and automotive industries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compounds\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/compounds4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬质聚氨酯泡沫是用于夹芯板等最常见隔热用途的性能更好的材料。然而,它们是高度易燃材料,会释放有毒气体,而且是用化石原料制造的。作为一种替代品,单宁泡沫是一种生物基材料,具有很强的耐火性,而且烟雾和有害气体排放量较低,是一种创新的替代品。在本研究中,通过形态学、热降解和火降解、机械性能和水亲和性对实验室制造的这两种材料的泡沫进行了比较,以填补它们与相关夹芯板之间的技术差距。结果表明,单宁泡沫仍相对不均匀(因为没有使用甲醛),对水的亲和性较高,但耐热性和耐火性较高。聚氨酯夹层的平面压缩强度高于单宁酸夹层(分别为 3.61 和 3.09 兆帕),这主要归功于树脂之间的交联度差异。此外,单宁泡沫的失重率较低(在可燃性测试中,单宁泡沫的失重率比聚氨酯泡沫低-70.684%),并具有火焰自熄能力。因此,在需要防火的领域,如建筑工程和汽车行业,使用单宁泡沫芯材的夹芯板是一种成功的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bio-Based Tannin Foams: Comparing Their Physical and Thermal Response to Polyurethane Foams in Lightweight Sandwich Panels
Rigid polyurethane foams are the better-performing material for the most common insulation purposes, like sandwich panels. Nevertheless, they are highly flammable materials, release toxic gases, and are manufactured from fossil sources. As an alternative, tannin foams are bio-based materials that work as innovative alternatives thanks to their great fire resistance, as well as lower smoke and harmful gases emissions. In the present study, lab-made foams of both materials were compared through morphology, thermal and fire degradation, mechanical properties, and water affinity in order to fill the technological gap between them and their related sandwich panels. It was observed that tannin foams are still relatively inhomogeneous (since formaldehyde was not used) and present a high affinity for water but have higher thermal and fire resistance. The flat compression strength of the polyurethane sandwiches was greater than that of tannin sandwiches (3.61 and 3.09 MPa, respectively) thanks, mainly, to the crosslinking degree difference between the resins. Also, tannin foams presented a lower weight loss (−70.684% lower weight loss in flammability tests than polyurethane foams) and the ability to self-extinguish the flame. Therefore, sandwich panels with tannin foam cores could be successful materials in areas that require protection against fire, such as the building engineering and automotive industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信