{"title":"斯里兰卡加勒初级保健中的糖尿病并发症及相关因素筛查","authors":"Vgm Sanjeewa, W. Kodikara-Arachchi, PV De Silva","doi":"10.4038/jrcs.v28i1.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diabetes (DM) and its complications show an increasing trend and pose a huge burden on the health system. Thus, early detection of complications is essential. Primary care institutions treat and follow up patients with diabetes in their territories. The aim of the study was to assess awareness, practices, and service-related factors associated with screening for diabetes complications among patients attending the medical clinics of primary care level hospitals in the Galle district.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at three Divisional Hospitals in Galle District, among patients attending medical clinics. Data was collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire designed to assess awareness and screening practices for diabetes complications, screening done for diabetes complications, and associated factors were analyzed.Results: Four hundred patients with diabetes participated in the study. The majority (more than 95%) were aware of common organs affected by DM and were aware of investigations and their availability at primary care institutions (more than 85.0%). Adherence to recommended screening tests and frequency was very low (ranging from 3% to 16%) and nearly half of the patients never had any form of screening. Older age was associated with better retinopathy screening {OR = 0.61 95% CI (0.41-0.91)} while having co-morbidities was associated with better screening for retinopathy {OR = 1.67 95% CI (1.02-2.71)} and ischemic heart disease.{OR = 2.03 95% CI (1.22-3.40)}. A better awareness was associated with better screening for DM complications.Conclusions: In conclusion, awareness about screening for diabetes complications was satisfactory among the study sample. However, the screening practices were sub-optimal as the recommended screening protocols have not been followed. Better screening was associated with better awareness, older age, having comorbidities, and being employed.","PeriodicalId":312372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Ruhunu Clinical Society","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for diabetes complications and associated factors in primary care in Galle, Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Vgm Sanjeewa, W. Kodikara-Arachchi, PV De Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/jrcs.v28i1.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Diabetes (DM) and its complications show an increasing trend and pose a huge burden on the health system. Thus, early detection of complications is essential. Primary care institutions treat and follow up patients with diabetes in their territories. The aim of the study was to assess awareness, practices, and service-related factors associated with screening for diabetes complications among patients attending the medical clinics of primary care level hospitals in the Galle district.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at three Divisional Hospitals in Galle District, among patients attending medical clinics. Data was collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire designed to assess awareness and screening practices for diabetes complications, screening done for diabetes complications, and associated factors were analyzed.Results: Four hundred patients with diabetes participated in the study. The majority (more than 95%) were aware of common organs affected by DM and were aware of investigations and their availability at primary care institutions (more than 85.0%). Adherence to recommended screening tests and frequency was very low (ranging from 3% to 16%) and nearly half of the patients never had any form of screening. Older age was associated with better retinopathy screening {OR = 0.61 95% CI (0.41-0.91)} while having co-morbidities was associated with better screening for retinopathy {OR = 1.67 95% CI (1.02-2.71)} and ischemic heart disease.{OR = 2.03 95% CI (1.22-3.40)}. A better awareness was associated with better screening for DM complications.Conclusions: In conclusion, awareness about screening for diabetes complications was satisfactory among the study sample. However, the screening practices were sub-optimal as the recommended screening protocols have not been followed. Better screening was associated with better awareness, older age, having comorbidities, and being employed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Ruhunu Clinical Society\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Ruhunu Clinical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/jrcs.v28i1.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Ruhunu Clinical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jrcs.v28i1.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:糖尿病(DM)及其并发症呈上升趋势,给医疗系统造成了巨大负担。因此,及早发现并发症至关重要。基层医疗机构负责治疗和跟踪其辖区内的糖尿病患者。本研究旨在评估加勒区初级保健级医院医疗诊所就诊患者对糖尿病并发症筛查的认识、做法和服务相关因素:在加勒区的三家分区医院对就诊患者进行了描述性横断面研究。通过由访问者填写的调查问卷收集数据,旨在评估糖尿病并发症的认识和筛查方法、糖尿病并发症筛查情况以及相关因素:结果:400 名糖尿病患者参与了研究。大多数患者(95%以上)了解受糖尿病影响的常见器官,并知道在基层医疗机构可以进行检查(85.0%以上)。对推荐筛查项目和频率的依从性非常低(从 3% 到 16% 不等),近一半的患者从未接受过任何形式的筛查。年龄越大,视网膜病变筛查的效果越好{OR = 0.61 95% CI (0.41-0.91)} ,而患有并发症的患者视网膜病变筛查的效果越好{OR = 1.67 95% CI (1.02-2.71)} ,而患有缺血性心脏病的患者视网膜病变筛查的效果越好{OR = 2.03 95% CI (1.22-3.40)}。认知度越高,糖尿病并发症筛查的效果越好:总之,研究样本对糖尿病并发症筛查的认识令人满意。然而,由于没有遵循推荐的筛查方案,筛查实践并不理想。较好的筛查与较高的认知度、年龄、合并症和就业有关。
Screening for diabetes complications and associated factors in primary care in Galle, Sri Lanka
Introduction: Diabetes (DM) and its complications show an increasing trend and pose a huge burden on the health system. Thus, early detection of complications is essential. Primary care institutions treat and follow up patients with diabetes in their territories. The aim of the study was to assess awareness, practices, and service-related factors associated with screening for diabetes complications among patients attending the medical clinics of primary care level hospitals in the Galle district.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at three Divisional Hospitals in Galle District, among patients attending medical clinics. Data was collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire designed to assess awareness and screening practices for diabetes complications, screening done for diabetes complications, and associated factors were analyzed.Results: Four hundred patients with diabetes participated in the study. The majority (more than 95%) were aware of common organs affected by DM and were aware of investigations and their availability at primary care institutions (more than 85.0%). Adherence to recommended screening tests and frequency was very low (ranging from 3% to 16%) and nearly half of the patients never had any form of screening. Older age was associated with better retinopathy screening {OR = 0.61 95% CI (0.41-0.91)} while having co-morbidities was associated with better screening for retinopathy {OR = 1.67 95% CI (1.02-2.71)} and ischemic heart disease.{OR = 2.03 95% CI (1.22-3.40)}. A better awareness was associated with better screening for DM complications.Conclusions: In conclusion, awareness about screening for diabetes complications was satisfactory among the study sample. However, the screening practices were sub-optimal as the recommended screening protocols have not been followed. Better screening was associated with better awareness, older age, having comorbidities, and being employed.