腹部手术中超声引导下腹横肌平面 (TAP) 阻滞与使用局部麻醉剂进行伤口浸润的术后平均疼痛评分比较

Q4 Health Professions
A. Sadique, Asjad Sharif, A. Gulrez
{"title":"腹部手术中超声引导下腹横肌平面 (TAP) 阻滞与使用局部麻醉剂进行伤口浸润的术后平均疼痛评分比较","authors":"A. Sadique, Asjad Sharif, A. Gulrez","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.4525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the mean post-operative pain score with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents in abdominal surgeries. Study design: Comparative prospective study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Combined Military Hospital, Bahawalpur Pakistan, from Oct 2018 to Apr 2019. Methodology: Sixty patients undergoing abdominal surgery aged 18-60 years were included. The patients in Group-A received transverses abdominis plane block with 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine bilaterally, while those in Group-B received 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine as local wound infiltration. Each patient was followed till 6 hours post-operatively. Results: Out of 60 patients, 35(58.33%) were male, and 25(41.67%) were females. In our study, the Visual analogue score was 1.63±0.85 in Group-A (ultrasound-guided TAP block) compared with 4.47±1.07 in patients with Group-B (wound infiltration with a local anaesthetic agent) with a p-value of 0.001, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The study concluded that the mean pain score in patients with ultrasound-guided Transversus abdominis plane block is less compared to wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents in abdominal surgeries.","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Mean Post-Operative Pain Score with Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block and Wound Infiltration with Local an Aesthetic Agent in Abdominal Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"A. Sadique, Asjad Sharif, A. Gulrez\",\"doi\":\"10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.4525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To compare the mean post-operative pain score with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents in abdominal surgeries. Study design: Comparative prospective study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Combined Military Hospital, Bahawalpur Pakistan, from Oct 2018 to Apr 2019. Methodology: Sixty patients undergoing abdominal surgery aged 18-60 years were included. The patients in Group-A received transverses abdominis plane block with 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine bilaterally, while those in Group-B received 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine as local wound infiltration. Each patient was followed till 6 hours post-operatively. Results: Out of 60 patients, 35(58.33%) were male, and 25(41.67%) were females. In our study, the Visual analogue score was 1.63±0.85 in Group-A (ultrasound-guided TAP block) compared with 4.47±1.07 in patients with Group-B (wound infiltration with a local anaesthetic agent) with a p-value of 0.001, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The study concluded that the mean pain score in patients with ultrasound-guided Transversus abdominis plane block is less compared to wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents in abdominal surgeries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.4525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.4525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的比较腹部手术中超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞和伤口浸润局麻药的术后平均疼痛评分。研究设计:前瞻性对比研究 研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦巴哈瓦尔布尔联合军事医院麻醉、重症监护和疼痛管理科,2018年10月至2019年4月。研究方法:纳入 60 名接受腹部手术的患者,年龄在 18-60 岁之间。A 组患者接受 20 毫升 0.25% 布比卡因双侧腹横肌平面阻滞,B 组患者接受 20 毫升 0.25% 布比卡因局部伤口浸润。对每位患者进行随访至术后 6 小时。结果在 60 名患者中,男性 35 人(58.33%),女性 25 人(41.67%)。在我们的研究中,A 组(超声引导 TAP 阻滞)患者的视觉模拟评分为(1.63±0.85)分,而 B 组(伤口浸润局麻药)患者的视觉模拟评分为(4.47±1.07)分,P 值为 0.001,具有统计学意义。结论研究得出结论,在腹部手术中,超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞患者的平均疼痛评分低于伤口浸润局麻药患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Mean Post-Operative Pain Score with Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block and Wound Infiltration with Local an Aesthetic Agent in Abdominal Surgeries
Objectives: To compare the mean post-operative pain score with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents in abdominal surgeries. Study design: Comparative prospective study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Combined Military Hospital, Bahawalpur Pakistan, from Oct 2018 to Apr 2019. Methodology: Sixty patients undergoing abdominal surgery aged 18-60 years were included. The patients in Group-A received transverses abdominis plane block with 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine bilaterally, while those in Group-B received 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine as local wound infiltration. Each patient was followed till 6 hours post-operatively. Results: Out of 60 patients, 35(58.33%) were male, and 25(41.67%) were females. In our study, the Visual analogue score was 1.63±0.85 in Group-A (ultrasound-guided TAP block) compared with 4.47±1.07 in patients with Group-B (wound infiltration with a local anaesthetic agent) with a p-value of 0.001, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The study concluded that the mean pain score in patients with ultrasound-guided Transversus abdominis plane block is less compared to wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents in abdominal surgeries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信