探讨晚期流产后父母的经历和整体需求:叙事性系统综述。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Francesca Giannatiempo, Caroline Hollins Martin, Jenny Patterson, Nicola Welsh
{"title":"探讨晚期流产后父母的经历和整体需求:叙事性系统综述。","authors":"Francesca Giannatiempo, Caroline Hollins Martin, Jenny Patterson, Nicola Welsh","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2023.2297905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 2% of all pregnancies result in pregnancy loss between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks' gestation, which is defined as 'late miscarriage'. Lack of consensus about definition of viability paired with existing multiple definitions of perinatal loss make it difficult to define the term 'late miscarriage'. Parents who experience late miscarriage often have had reassuring scan-milestones, which established their confidence in healthy pregnancy progression and identity formation, which socially integrates their baby into their family. The clinical lexicon alongside the lack of support offered to parents experiencing late miscarriage may disclaim their needs, which has potential to cause adverse psychological responses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review what primary research reports about parents' experiences and their perceived holistic needs following late miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative systematic review was carried out. Papers were screened based on gestational age at time of loss (i.e. between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks' gestation). The focus was set on experience and holistic needs arising from the loss rather than its clinical care and pathophysiology. Studies were selected using PRISMA-S checklist, and quality assessed using the <i>Critical Appraisal Skills Program</i> (CASP) tool. Thematic analysis was used to guide the narrative synthesis of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes emerged: communication and information-giving; feelings post-event; and impact of support provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Literature about the experience of late miscarriage is scarce, with what was found reporting a lack of compassionate and individually tailored psychological follow-up care for parents following late miscarriage. Hence, more research in this arena is required to inform and develop this area of maternity care provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"879-904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring parents' experiences and holistic needs following late miscarriage: a narrative systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Giannatiempo, Caroline Hollins Martin, Jenny Patterson, Nicola Welsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02646838.2023.2297905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 2% of all pregnancies result in pregnancy loss between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks' gestation, which is defined as 'late miscarriage'. Lack of consensus about definition of viability paired with existing multiple definitions of perinatal loss make it difficult to define the term 'late miscarriage'. Parents who experience late miscarriage often have had reassuring scan-milestones, which established their confidence in healthy pregnancy progression and identity formation, which socially integrates their baby into their family. The clinical lexicon alongside the lack of support offered to parents experiencing late miscarriage may disclaim their needs, which has potential to cause adverse psychological responses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review what primary research reports about parents' experiences and their perceived holistic needs following late miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative systematic review was carried out. Papers were screened based on gestational age at time of loss (i.e. between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks' gestation). The focus was set on experience and holistic needs arising from the loss rather than its clinical care and pathophysiology. Studies were selected using PRISMA-S checklist, and quality assessed using the <i>Critical Appraisal Skills Program</i> (CASP) tool. Thematic analysis was used to guide the narrative synthesis of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes emerged: communication and information-giving; feelings post-event; and impact of support provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Literature about the experience of late miscarriage is scarce, with what was found reporting a lack of compassionate and individually tailored psychological follow-up care for parents following late miscarriage. Hence, more research in this arena is required to inform and develop this area of maternity care provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"879-904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2297905\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2297905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在所有妊娠中,高达 2% 的孕妇会在妊娠 14+0 周至 23+6 周之间流产,这被定义为 "晚期流产"。由于对胎儿存活率的定义缺乏共识,再加上围产期流产的多种定义,因此很难界定 "晚期流产 "这一术语。经历过晚期流产的父母通常都有过令人欣慰的扫描里程碑,这使他们对妊娠的健康发展和身份的形成充满信心,从而使婴儿融入他们的家庭。临床词汇以及为经历晚期流产的父母提供的支持的缺乏可能会忽略他们的需求,这有可能导致不良的心理反应。目的:回顾有关晚期流产后父母的经历及其感知的整体需求的主要研究报告:方法:进行叙述性系统综述。根据流产时的妊娠年龄(即妊娠 14+0 周至 23+6 周)对论文进行筛选。重点放在失独的经历和整体需求上,而不是其临床护理和病理生理学上。研究采用 PRISMA-S 核对表进行筛选,并使用批判性评估技能计划 (CASP) 工具进行质量评估。采用主题分析法对研究结果进行叙述性综合:六项研究符合纳入标准。出现了三大主题:沟通与信息提供;事件发生后的感受;以及提供支持的影响:有关晚期流产经历的文献很少,所发现的文献报告了晚期流产后父母缺乏富有同情心和个性化的心理跟踪护理。因此,需要在这一领域开展更多的研究,以便为这一领域的孕产妇护理提供信息和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring parents' experiences and holistic needs following late miscarriage: a narrative systematic review.

Background: Up to 2% of all pregnancies result in pregnancy loss between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks' gestation, which is defined as 'late miscarriage'. Lack of consensus about definition of viability paired with existing multiple definitions of perinatal loss make it difficult to define the term 'late miscarriage'. Parents who experience late miscarriage often have had reassuring scan-milestones, which established their confidence in healthy pregnancy progression and identity formation, which socially integrates their baby into their family. The clinical lexicon alongside the lack of support offered to parents experiencing late miscarriage may disclaim their needs, which has potential to cause adverse psychological responses.

Aim: To review what primary research reports about parents' experiences and their perceived holistic needs following late miscarriage.

Methods: A narrative systematic review was carried out. Papers were screened based on gestational age at time of loss (i.e. between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks' gestation). The focus was set on experience and holistic needs arising from the loss rather than its clinical care and pathophysiology. Studies were selected using PRISMA-S checklist, and quality assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool. Thematic analysis was used to guide the narrative synthesis of findings.

Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes emerged: communication and information-giving; feelings post-event; and impact of support provision.

Conclusion: Literature about the experience of late miscarriage is scarce, with what was found reporting a lack of compassionate and individually tailored psychological follow-up care for parents following late miscarriage. Hence, more research in this arena is required to inform and develop this area of maternity care provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信