Alexander L. Burton, Cheryl Lero Jonson, William T. Miller, Jiayi Wang
{"title":"态度模式与接受学院培训：对监狱官员的准实验研究","authors":"Alexander L. Burton, Cheryl Lero Jonson, William T. Miller, Jiayi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11292-023-09604-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to assess whether the receptivity of prison officers toward academy training differs based on their views of rehabilitation and punitiveness. </p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Using the potential outcomes framework, we quasi-experimentally examine the role of newly-hired officers’ (<i>N</i> = 519) rehabilitative and punitive attitudes on post-training self-efficacy in performing the occupational duties of a prison officer. Linear regression models are estimated to examine the effects of the two attitudes on the confidence to perform the job of a prison officer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Results indicate that officers espousing greater rehabilitative views leave academy training with greater confidence in completing all roles associated with the job, while officers holding stronger punitive views leave with substantially less confidence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>There are substantial differences in what rehabilitative-oriented prison officers get out of academy training versus punitively oriented officers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudinal schemas and academy training receptivity: a quasi-experimental study of prison officers\",\"authors\":\"Alexander L. Burton, Cheryl Lero Jonson, William T. Miller, Jiayi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-023-09604-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to assess whether the receptivity of prison officers toward academy training differs based on their views of rehabilitation and punitiveness. </p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Using the potential outcomes framework, we quasi-experimentally examine the role of newly-hired officers’ (<i>N</i> = 519) rehabilitative and punitive attitudes on post-training self-efficacy in performing the occupational duties of a prison officer. Linear regression models are estimated to examine the effects of the two attitudes on the confidence to perform the job of a prison officer.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Results indicate that officers espousing greater rehabilitative views leave academy training with greater confidence in completing all roles associated with the job, while officers holding stronger punitive views leave with substantially less confidence.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>There are substantial differences in what rehabilitative-oriented prison officers get out of academy training versus punitively oriented officers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09604-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09604-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attitudinal schemas and academy training receptivity: a quasi-experimental study of prison officers
Objectives
This study aimed to assess whether the receptivity of prison officers toward academy training differs based on their views of rehabilitation and punitiveness.
Methods
Using the potential outcomes framework, we quasi-experimentally examine the role of newly-hired officers’ (N = 519) rehabilitative and punitive attitudes on post-training self-efficacy in performing the occupational duties of a prison officer. Linear regression models are estimated to examine the effects of the two attitudes on the confidence to perform the job of a prison officer.
Results
Results indicate that officers espousing greater rehabilitative views leave academy training with greater confidence in completing all roles associated with the job, while officers holding stronger punitive views leave with substantially less confidence.
Conclusions
There are substantial differences in what rehabilitative-oriented prison officers get out of academy training versus punitively oriented officers.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
