在慢性偏头痛中转换抗CGRP单克隆抗体:对erenumab、fremanezumab和galcanezumab的实际观察。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jamie Talbot, Rebecca Stuckey, Natasha Wood, Alexander Gordon, Ginette Crossingham, Stuart Weatherby
{"title":"在慢性偏头痛中转换抗CGRP单克隆抗体:对erenumab、fremanezumab和galcanezumab的实际观察。","authors":"Jamie Talbot, Rebecca Stuckey, Natasha Wood, Alexander Gordon, Ginette Crossingham, Stuart Weatherby","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAb) are effective in migraine; however, few studies have examined the benefit of switching from one anti-CGRP-mAb to another. In order to better inform clinical practice in this situation, we present our real-world findings of switching anti-CGRP-mAb in chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with chronic migraine that switched anti-CGRP-mAb treatment (erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab) due to ineffectiveness or adverse effects were retrospectively identified. Headache diary data before and up to 6 months after anti-CGRP-mAb switch were analysed. Main outcome measures were monthly red days (days with headaches limiting activity or requiring triptans), headache days (days with any kind of headache), triptan use, other analgesic use and headache disability (Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score) at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 66 instances of switching among 54 individuals. There were non-significant reductions of -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3) red days from baseline at 3 months, with 10 individuals (15%) showing ≥50% improvement and 22 (33%) experiencing a ≥30% improvement. Improvements in headache days, triptan days, other painkiller use and HIT-6 score were non-significant. When individuals that switched due to side effects were excluded from the analysis, significant reductions in headache (Friedman p=0.044) and a trend for improvement in red days (Friedman p=0.083) were observed. With regard to side effects, on 12 occasions these improved or resolved on switching to a different anti-CGRP-mAb, while new symptoms were reported on eight occasions following a switch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recorded modest improvements in headache outcomes, although significant results were only observed in those that switched anti-CGRP-mAb due to ineffectiveness. Switching may therefore be a viable option for these individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":"178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Switching anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine: real-world observations of erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Talbot, Rebecca Stuckey, Natasha Wood, Alexander Gordon, Ginette Crossingham, Stuart Weatherby\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAb) are effective in migraine; however, few studies have examined the benefit of switching from one anti-CGRP-mAb to another. In order to better inform clinical practice in this situation, we present our real-world findings of switching anti-CGRP-mAb in chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with chronic migraine that switched anti-CGRP-mAb treatment (erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab) due to ineffectiveness or adverse effects were retrospectively identified. Headache diary data before and up to 6 months after anti-CGRP-mAb switch were analysed. Main outcome measures were monthly red days (days with headaches limiting activity or requiring triptans), headache days (days with any kind of headache), triptan use, other analgesic use and headache disability (Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score) at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 66 instances of switching among 54 individuals. There were non-significant reductions of -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3) red days from baseline at 3 months, with 10 individuals (15%) showing ≥50% improvement and 22 (33%) experiencing a ≥30% improvement. Improvements in headache days, triptan days, other painkiller use and HIT-6 score were non-significant. When individuals that switched due to side effects were excluded from the analysis, significant reductions in headache (Friedman p=0.044) and a trend for improvement in red days (Friedman p=0.083) were observed. With regard to side effects, on 12 occasions these improved or resolved on switching to a different anti-CGRP-mAb, while new symptoms were reported on eight occasions following a switch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recorded modest improvements in headache outcomes, although significant results were only observed in those that switched anti-CGRP-mAb due to ineffectiveness. Switching may therefore be a viable option for these individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"178-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003779\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体(anti-CGRP-mAb)对偏头痛很有效,但很少有研究探讨从一种抗CGRP-mAb转换到另一种抗CGRP-mAb的益处。为了在这种情况下更好地指导临床实践,我们介绍了在慢性偏头痛患者中转换抗CGRP-mAb的实际研究结果:我们对因疗效不佳或不良反应而更换抗CGRP-mAb治疗(艾瑞单抗、氟马珠单抗或加仑珠单抗)的慢性偏头痛患者进行了回顾性鉴定。分析了转换抗CGRP-mAb治疗前和转换后6个月内的头痛日记数据。主要结果指标为每月的红色天数(头痛限制活动或需要使用三苯氧胺的天数)、头痛天数(出现任何类型头痛的天数)、三苯氧胺的使用情况、其他镇痛药的使用情况以及3个月后的头痛残疾程度(头痛影响测试-6(HIT-6)评分):分析包括 54 人中的 66 次转换。3个月后,头痛天数比基线减少了-1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)天,无显著性差异,其中10人(15%)的头痛天数改善了≥50%,22人(33%)的头痛天数改善了≥30%。头痛天数、服用三苯氧胺天数、使用其他止痛药和 HIT-6 评分的改善幅度均不显著。如果将因副作用而更换治疗方案的患者排除在分析之外,则观察到头痛天数显著减少(弗里德曼 p=0.044),红斑天数有改善趋势(弗里德曼 p=0.083)。在副作用方面,有12例患者在换用另一种抗CGRP-mAb后症状得到改善或缓解,而有8例患者在换用另一种抗CGRP-mAb后出现了新的症状:我们记录到头痛的治疗效果略有改善,但只有在因疗效不佳而更换抗CGRP-mAb的患者中才能观察到明显的效果。因此,对这些人来说,换药可能是一个可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Switching anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine: real-world observations of erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab.

Objectives: The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAb) are effective in migraine; however, few studies have examined the benefit of switching from one anti-CGRP-mAb to another. In order to better inform clinical practice in this situation, we present our real-world findings of switching anti-CGRP-mAb in chronic migraine.

Methods: Individuals with chronic migraine that switched anti-CGRP-mAb treatment (erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab) due to ineffectiveness or adverse effects were retrospectively identified. Headache diary data before and up to 6 months after anti-CGRP-mAb switch were analysed. Main outcome measures were monthly red days (days with headaches limiting activity or requiring triptans), headache days (days with any kind of headache), triptan use, other analgesic use and headache disability (Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score) at 3 months.

Results: The analysis included 66 instances of switching among 54 individuals. There were non-significant reductions of -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3) red days from baseline at 3 months, with 10 individuals (15%) showing ≥50% improvement and 22 (33%) experiencing a ≥30% improvement. Improvements in headache days, triptan days, other painkiller use and HIT-6 score were non-significant. When individuals that switched due to side effects were excluded from the analysis, significant reductions in headache (Friedman p=0.044) and a trend for improvement in red days (Friedman p=0.083) were observed. With regard to side effects, on 12 occasions these improved or resolved on switching to a different anti-CGRP-mAb, while new symptoms were reported on eight occasions following a switch.

Conclusion: We recorded modest improvements in headache outcomes, although significant results were only observed in those that switched anti-CGRP-mAb due to ineffectiveness. Switching may therefore be a viable option for these individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信