Ahmed Choukri Abdullah, Olgac Ozarslan, Sara Soltanabadi Farshi, Sajjad Rahmani Dabbagh, Savas Tasoglu
{"title":"通过机器学习优化熔融电写三维印刷","authors":"Ahmed Choukri Abdullah, Olgac Ozarslan, Sara Soltanabadi Farshi, Sajjad Rahmani Dabbagh, Savas Tasoglu","doi":"10.1002/agt2.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Melt electrowriting (MEW) is a solvent-free (i.e., no volatile chemicals), a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) printing method that enables the fabrication of semi-flexible structures with rigid polymers. Despite its advantages, the MEW process is sensitive to changes in printing parameters (e.g., voltage, printing pressure, and temperature), which can cause fluid column breakage, jet lag, and/or fiber pulsing, ultimately deteriorating the resolution and printing quality. In spite of the commonly used error-and-trial method to determine the most suitable parameters, here, we present a machine learning (ML)-enabled image analysis-based method for determining the optimum MEW printing parameters through an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI). We trained five different ML algorithms using 168 MEW 3D print samples, among which the Gaussian process regression ML model yielded 93% accuracy of the variability in the dependent variable, 0.12329 on root mean square error for the validation set and 0.015201 mean square error in predicting line thickness. Integration of ML with a control feedback loop and MEW can reduce the error-and-trial steps prior to the 3D printing process, decreasing the printing time (i.e., increasing the overall throughput of MEW) and material waste (i.e., improving the cost-effectiveness of MEW). Moreover, embedding a trained ML model with the feedback control system in a GUI facilitates a more straightforward use of ML-based optimization techniques in the industrial section (i.e., for users with no ML skills).</p>","PeriodicalId":72127,"journal":{"name":"Aggregate (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agt2.495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-enabled optimization of melt electro-writing three-dimensional printing\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Choukri Abdullah, Olgac Ozarslan, Sara Soltanabadi Farshi, Sajjad Rahmani Dabbagh, Savas Tasoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agt2.495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Melt electrowriting (MEW) is a solvent-free (i.e., no volatile chemicals), a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) printing method that enables the fabrication of semi-flexible structures with rigid polymers. Despite its advantages, the MEW process is sensitive to changes in printing parameters (e.g., voltage, printing pressure, and temperature), which can cause fluid column breakage, jet lag, and/or fiber pulsing, ultimately deteriorating the resolution and printing quality. In spite of the commonly used error-and-trial method to determine the most suitable parameters, here, we present a machine learning (ML)-enabled image analysis-based method for determining the optimum MEW printing parameters through an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI). We trained five different ML algorithms using 168 MEW 3D print samples, among which the Gaussian process regression ML model yielded 93% accuracy of the variability in the dependent variable, 0.12329 on root mean square error for the validation set and 0.015201 mean square error in predicting line thickness. Integration of ML with a control feedback loop and MEW can reduce the error-and-trial steps prior to the 3D printing process, decreasing the printing time (i.e., increasing the overall throughput of MEW) and material waste (i.e., improving the cost-effectiveness of MEW). Moreover, embedding a trained ML model with the feedback control system in a GUI facilitates a more straightforward use of ML-based optimization techniques in the industrial section (i.e., for users with no ML skills).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aggregate (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agt2.495\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aggregate (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agt2.495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggregate (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agt2.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
熔融电泳(MEW)是一种无溶剂(即无挥发性化学品)、高分辨率的三维(3D)打印方法,可使用刚性聚合物制造半柔性结构。尽管 MEW 工艺具有诸多优点,但它对打印参数(如电压、打印压力和温度)的变化非常敏感,这可能会导致液柱断裂、喷射滞后和/或纤维脉动,最终降低分辨率和打印质量。尽管通常使用误差-试验法来确定最合适的参数,但在此,我们提出了一种基于机器学习(ML)的图像分析方法,通过易于使用的图形用户界面(GUI)来确定最佳 MEW 印刷参数。我们使用 168 个 MEW 3D 打印样本训练了五种不同的 ML 算法,其中高斯过程回归 ML 模型的因变量变化准确率为 93%,验证集的均方根误差为 0.12329,预测线条厚度的均方根误差为 0.015201。将 ML 与控制反馈回路和 MEW 相结合,可以减少三维打印过程之前的错误和试验步骤,从而缩短打印时间(即提高 MEW 的总体产量)和减少材料浪费(即提高 MEW 的成本效益)。此外,在图形用户界面中嵌入经过训练的 ML 模型和反馈控制系统,有助于在工业部分更直接地使用基于 ML 的优化技术(即对于没有 ML 技能的用户)。
Machine learning-enabled optimization of melt electro-writing three-dimensional printing
Melt electrowriting (MEW) is a solvent-free (i.e., no volatile chemicals), a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) printing method that enables the fabrication of semi-flexible structures with rigid polymers. Despite its advantages, the MEW process is sensitive to changes in printing parameters (e.g., voltage, printing pressure, and temperature), which can cause fluid column breakage, jet lag, and/or fiber pulsing, ultimately deteriorating the resolution and printing quality. In spite of the commonly used error-and-trial method to determine the most suitable parameters, here, we present a machine learning (ML)-enabled image analysis-based method for determining the optimum MEW printing parameters through an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI). We trained five different ML algorithms using 168 MEW 3D print samples, among which the Gaussian process regression ML model yielded 93% accuracy of the variability in the dependent variable, 0.12329 on root mean square error for the validation set and 0.015201 mean square error in predicting line thickness. Integration of ML with a control feedback loop and MEW can reduce the error-and-trial steps prior to the 3D printing process, decreasing the printing time (i.e., increasing the overall throughput of MEW) and material waste (i.e., improving the cost-effectiveness of MEW). Moreover, embedding a trained ML model with the feedback control system in a GUI facilitates a more straightforward use of ML-based optimization techniques in the industrial section (i.e., for users with no ML skills).