Jeffrey T. Turn , Joerg Mayer , Koichi Nagata , Frane Banovic , Kristina Meichner , David J. Hurley , Eric Koslowski , Robert M. Gogal Jr.
{"title":"体外无菌疗法对犬、马和鸡淋巴细胞的影响","authors":"Jeffrey T. Turn , Joerg Mayer , Koichi Nagata , Frane Banovic , Kristina Meichner , David J. Hurley , Eric Koslowski , Robert M. Gogal Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Apitherapy is a form of alternative medicine that utilizes products from the western honeybee (<span><em>Apis mellifera</em></span><span><span><span><span><span>), including honey, propolis, and honeybee venom, to improve the health status of human patients by altering host immunity. An added benefit of these products is that they are nutraceuticals and relatively inexpensive to aquire. Currently, little is known about the use of honeybee products in veterinary species, as well as their impact on host immunity. In the present in vitro study, honey, propolis, and honeybee venom were co-cultured with enriched </span>canine, equine, and chicken </span>peripheral blood lymphocytes<span> (PBLs) with cell proliferation, cell viability/apoptosis, and cellular morphology evaluated. </span></span>Concanavalin A<span> (Con A) and dexamethasone were used as stimulatory and suppressive controls, respectively. Honeybee products’ effects on the three veterinary species varied by product and the species. Honey stimulated the PBLs proliferation in all three species but also displayed some increased cytotoxicity. Propolis stimulated proliferation in canine and equine PBLs, however, it suppressed proliferation in the chicken PBLs. Honeybee venom was the strongest PBL stimulant for all three species and in the equine, surpassed the stimulant response of Con A and yet, enhanced PBL </span></span>cell viability<span><span> post culture. In summary, the results of this preliminary in vitro study show that these three honeybee products do impact lymphocyte proliferation and viability in </span>dogs, horses, and chickens, and that more research both in vitro and in vivo will be necessary to draw conclusions regarding their future use as immune stimulants or inhibitors.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 110700"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of apitherapy on canine, equine, and chicken lymphocytes, in vitro\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey T. Turn , Joerg Mayer , Koichi Nagata , Frane Banovic , Kristina Meichner , David J. Hurley , Eric Koslowski , Robert M. Gogal Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Apitherapy is a form of alternative medicine that utilizes products from the western honeybee (<span><em>Apis mellifera</em></span><span><span><span><span><span>), including honey, propolis, and honeybee venom, to improve the health status of human patients by altering host immunity. An added benefit of these products is that they are nutraceuticals and relatively inexpensive to aquire. Currently, little is known about the use of honeybee products in veterinary species, as well as their impact on host immunity. In the present in vitro study, honey, propolis, and honeybee venom were co-cultured with enriched </span>canine, equine, and chicken </span>peripheral blood lymphocytes<span> (PBLs) with cell proliferation, cell viability/apoptosis, and cellular morphology evaluated. </span></span>Concanavalin A<span> (Con A) and dexamethasone were used as stimulatory and suppressive controls, respectively. Honeybee products’ effects on the three veterinary species varied by product and the species. Honey stimulated the PBLs proliferation in all three species but also displayed some increased cytotoxicity. Propolis stimulated proliferation in canine and equine PBLs, however, it suppressed proliferation in the chicken PBLs. Honeybee venom was the strongest PBL stimulant for all three species and in the equine, surpassed the stimulant response of Con A and yet, enhanced PBL </span></span>cell viability<span><span> post culture. In summary, the results of this preliminary in vitro study show that these three honeybee products do impact lymphocyte proliferation and viability in </span>dogs, horses, and chickens, and that more research both in vitro and in vivo will be necessary to draw conclusions regarding their future use as immune stimulants or inhibitors.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"volume\":\"268 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016524272300154X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016524272300154X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
蜂疗是一种替代医学,利用西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)的产品,包括蜂蜜、蜂胶和蜂毒,通过改变宿主免疫力来改善人类患者的健康状况。这些产品的另一个好处是,它们是营养保健品,制作成本相对较低。目前,人们对蜜蜂产品在兽医物种中的使用及其对宿主免疫力的影响知之甚少。在本体外研究中,蜂蜜、蜂胶和蜂毒与富集的犬、马和鸡外周血淋巴细胞(PBLs)共同培养,并对细胞增殖、细胞活力/凋亡和细胞形态进行评估。康乃馨 A(Con A)和地塞米松分别用作刺激性和抑制性对照组。蜜蜂产品对三种兽医物种的影响因产品和物种而异。蜂蜜能刺激所有三种兽类的白细胞介素增殖,但也显示出一定的细胞毒性。蜂胶能刺激犬和马的后贝叶细胞增殖,但却抑制了鸡的后贝叶细胞增殖。蜜蜂毒液对所有三个物种的 PBL 刺激作用都最强,对马的刺激作用超过了 Con A,但却增强了培养后 PBL 细胞的活力。总之,这项初步体外研究的结果表明,这三种蜜蜂产品确实会影响狗、马和鸡体内淋巴细胞的增殖和活力。
Impact of apitherapy on canine, equine, and chicken lymphocytes, in vitro
Apitherapy is a form of alternative medicine that utilizes products from the western honeybee (Apis mellifera), including honey, propolis, and honeybee venom, to improve the health status of human patients by altering host immunity. An added benefit of these products is that they are nutraceuticals and relatively inexpensive to aquire. Currently, little is known about the use of honeybee products in veterinary species, as well as their impact on host immunity. In the present in vitro study, honey, propolis, and honeybee venom were co-cultured with enriched canine, equine, and chicken peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) with cell proliferation, cell viability/apoptosis, and cellular morphology evaluated. Concanavalin A (Con A) and dexamethasone were used as stimulatory and suppressive controls, respectively. Honeybee products’ effects on the three veterinary species varied by product and the species. Honey stimulated the PBLs proliferation in all three species but also displayed some increased cytotoxicity. Propolis stimulated proliferation in canine and equine PBLs, however, it suppressed proliferation in the chicken PBLs. Honeybee venom was the strongest PBL stimulant for all three species and in the equine, surpassed the stimulant response of Con A and yet, enhanced PBL cell viability post culture. In summary, the results of this preliminary in vitro study show that these three honeybee products do impact lymphocyte proliferation and viability in dogs, horses, and chickens, and that more research both in vitro and in vivo will be necessary to draw conclusions regarding their future use as immune stimulants or inhibitors.
期刊介绍:
The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease.
Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above.
The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.