Istradefylline 对帕金森病患者姿势异常的影响:基线姿势角度测量与肌张力障碍统一量表总分变化的关联研究

Q3 Neuroscience
Makio Takahashi , Toshio Shimokawa , Jinsoo Koh , Takao Takeshima , Hirofumi Yamashita , Yoshinori Kajimoto , Hidefumi Ito
{"title":"Istradefylline 对帕金森病患者姿势异常的影响:基线姿势角度测量与肌张力障碍统一量表总分变化的关联研究","authors":"Makio Takahashi ,&nbsp;Toshio Shimokawa ,&nbsp;Jinsoo Koh ,&nbsp;Takao Takeshima ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Yamashita ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kajimoto ,&nbsp;Hidefumi Ito","doi":"10.1016/j.ensci.2023.100493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (<em>n</em> = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (−8.33% [interquartile range: −43.97, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (−‍1.50 [−9.25, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.015) and median percent change (−13.33% [−50.47, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37974,"journal":{"name":"eNeurologicalSci","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515/pdfft?md5=b36a230611fde99de939b0c93580ceb0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405650223000515-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of istradefylline on postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease: An association study of baseline postural angle measurements with changes in Unified Dystonia Rating Scale total score\",\"authors\":\"Makio Takahashi ,&nbsp;Toshio Shimokawa ,&nbsp;Jinsoo Koh ,&nbsp;Takao Takeshima ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Yamashita ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kajimoto ,&nbsp;Hidefumi Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ensci.2023.100493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (<em>n</em> = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (−8.33% [interquartile range: −43.97, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (−‍1.50 [−9.25, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.015) and median percent change (−13.33% [−50.47, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeurologicalSci\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515/pdfft?md5=b36a230611fde99de939b0c93580ceb0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405650223000515-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeurologicalSci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeurologicalSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们之前的研究中,帕金森病(PD)患者接受异曲非林治疗后体位异常(PA)得到了改善,这体现在从第0周到第24周统一肌张力评定量表(UDRS)总分平均值的下降上。一项基于基线临床特征的亚组分析调查了UDRS总分的改善与异曲非林治疗之间的关联。然而,PA的客观评估与UDRS总分的改善之间的关系尚不清楚。本临时分析调查了异曲唑仑治疗后 UDRS 总分的改善与基线躯干和颈部角度、PA 的客观评估(根据之前研究中拍摄的患者照片测量)之间的关联。根据基线时的躯干前屈角 (TFFA)、躯干侧屈角 (TLFA) 和颈部屈角 (NFA) 值将患者(n = 31)分层。从第 0 周到第 24 周,UDRS 总分的中位百分比变化(-8.33% [四分位间范围:-43.97,0.00],P = 0.在TFFA值等于或高于中位数的患者中,UDRS总分的中位数变化(-‍1.50 [-9.25, 0.00],P = 0.015)和中位数变化百分比(-13.33% [-50.47, 0.00],P = 0.009)均有所改善。晚期 PA 患者的 UDRS 总分在使用异曲菲林后有更一致的改善。TFFA和TLFA的基线值是客观值,可用于评估异曲非林对PD和PA患者的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of istradefylline on postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease: An association study of baseline postural angle measurements with changes in Unified Dystonia Rating Scale total score

In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (n = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (−8.33% [interquartile range: −43.97, 0.00], P = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (−‍1.50 [−9.25, 0.00], P = 0.015) and median percent change (−13.33% [−50.47, 0.00], P = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeurologicalSci
eNeurologicalSci Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: eNeurologicalSci provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. eNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). eNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism. The fields covered may include neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology, neuroepidemiology, neurogenetics, neuroimmunology, neuroophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropharmacology, neurophysiology, neuropsychology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurooncology, neurotoxicology, restorative neurology, and tropical neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信