{"title":"Istradefylline 对帕金森病患者姿势异常的影响:基线姿势角度测量与肌张力障碍统一量表总分变化的关联研究","authors":"Makio Takahashi , Toshio Shimokawa , Jinsoo Koh , Takao Takeshima , Hirofumi Yamashita , Yoshinori Kajimoto , Hidefumi Ito","doi":"10.1016/j.ensci.2023.100493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (<em>n</em> = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (−8.33% [interquartile range: −43.97, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (−1.50 [−9.25, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.015) and median percent change (−13.33% [−50.47, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37974,"journal":{"name":"eNeurologicalSci","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515/pdfft?md5=b36a230611fde99de939b0c93580ceb0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405650223000515-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of istradefylline on postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease: An association study of baseline postural angle measurements with changes in Unified Dystonia Rating Scale total score\",\"authors\":\"Makio Takahashi , Toshio Shimokawa , Jinsoo Koh , Takao Takeshima , Hirofumi Yamashita , Yoshinori Kajimoto , Hidefumi Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ensci.2023.100493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (<em>n</em> = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (−8.33% [interquartile range: −43.97, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (−1.50 [−9.25, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.015) and median percent change (−13.33% [−50.47, 0.00], <em>P</em> = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeurologicalSci\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515/pdfft?md5=b36a230611fde99de939b0c93580ceb0&pid=1-s2.0-S2405650223000515-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeurologicalSci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeurologicalSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650223000515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of istradefylline on postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease: An association study of baseline postural angle measurements with changes in Unified Dystonia Rating Scale total score
In our previous study, istradefylline treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improved postural abnormalities (PAs), as seen from a decrease in the mean Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) total score from week 0 to week 24. A subgroup analysis based on baseline clinical characteristics investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score and istradefylline treatment. However, the association between an objective assessment of PAs and improvement in the UDRS total score is unclear. This ad hoc analysis investigated the association between improvement in the UDRS total score after istradefylline treatment and baseline trunk and neck angles, objective assessments of PAs, measured from patients' photographs taken in the previous study. The patients (n = 31) were stratified into groups based on the trunk forward flexion angle (TFFA), trunk lateral flexion angle (TLFA), and neck flexion angle (NFA) values at baseline. From week 0 to week 24, significant improvements in the UDRS total score were found in median percent change (−8.33% [interquartile range: −43.97, 0.00], P = 0.039) in patients with equal to or above the median TFFA values, and in median change (−1.50 [−9.25, 0.00], P = 0.015) and median percent change (−13.33% [−50.47, 0.00], P = 0.009) in patients with equal to or above the median TLFA values. Patients with more advanced PAs showed more consistent improvements in the UDRS total score with istradefylline. Baseline TFFA and TLFA values, which are objective values, may be useful to assess the istradefylline effectiveness in patients with PD and PAs.
期刊介绍:
eNeurologicalSci provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. eNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). eNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism. The fields covered may include neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology, neuroepidemiology, neurogenetics, neuroimmunology, neuroophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropharmacology, neurophysiology, neuropsychology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurooncology, neurotoxicology, restorative neurology, and tropical neurology.