超声引导下脐带静脉导管插入与盲法的比较:随机对照试验

Biomedicine hub Pub Date : 2024-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000535096
Purbasha Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Mohanty, Tapas Kumar Som, Tanushree Sahoo, Usha Devi, Nerbadyswari Deep Bag
{"title":"超声引导下脐带静脉导管插入与盲法的比较:随机对照试验","authors":"Purbasha Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Mohanty, Tapas Kumar Som, Tanushree Sahoo, Usha Devi, Nerbadyswari Deep Bag","doi":"10.1159/000535096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasonography (USG) can be used in neonates to manipulate and place the umbilical catheter in the correct position. Although chest radiograph (CXR) is the gold standard, a noninvasive method like USG without radiation exposure may be an alternative bedside armamentarium to the clinician. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether USG-guided umbilical venous catheter (UVC) insertion is superior to the conventional method for the successful insertion of UVC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The neonates born between 25 and 42 weeks of gestation requiring parenteral fluids and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between September 2020 and November 2022 were randomized in two weight-based strata: ≤1,200 and >1,200 g. USG-guided UVC insertion was done in the intervention group and blind UVC insertion was done in the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 112 enrolled neonates, 58 were in the USG-guided group and 54 in the blind group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the intervention and control groups (20% versus 29% [RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.36-1.33]). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in locating tip position were 97 and 46.8%, respectively. The mean procedure time in USG and blind groups was 8.9 and 8.3 min, respectively (<i>p</i> value 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>USG does not reduce the failure rates during the insertion of umbilical catheters. However, being a safe, noninvasive procedure, it can be considered a rescue modality to CXR in NICUs equipped with portable USG for guiding UVC insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":101351,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine hub","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Insertion with Blind Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Purbasha Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Mohanty, Tapas Kumar Som, Tanushree Sahoo, Usha Devi, Nerbadyswari Deep Bag\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasonography (USG) can be used in neonates to manipulate and place the umbilical catheter in the correct position. Although chest radiograph (CXR) is the gold standard, a noninvasive method like USG without radiation exposure may be an alternative bedside armamentarium to the clinician. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether USG-guided umbilical venous catheter (UVC) insertion is superior to the conventional method for the successful insertion of UVC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The neonates born between 25 and 42 weeks of gestation requiring parenteral fluids and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between September 2020 and November 2022 were randomized in two weight-based strata: ≤1,200 and >1,200 g. USG-guided UVC insertion was done in the intervention group and blind UVC insertion was done in the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 112 enrolled neonates, 58 were in the USG-guided group and 54 in the blind group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the intervention and control groups (20% versus 29% [RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.36-1.33]). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in locating tip position were 97 and 46.8%, respectively. The mean procedure time in USG and blind groups was 8.9 and 8.3 min, respectively (<i>p</i> value 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>USG does not reduce the failure rates during the insertion of umbilical catheters. However, being a safe, noninvasive procedure, it can be considered a rescue modality to CXR in NICUs equipped with portable USG for guiding UVC insertion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine hub\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine hub\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:新生儿可使用超声波检查(USG)来操作脐导管并将其置于正确位置。虽然胸片(CXR)是金标准,但像 USG 这样无辐射的无创方法可能会成为临床医生的另一种床旁工具。本研究旨在评估 USG 引导下的脐静脉导管(UVC)插入是否优于传统方法,以成功插入 UVC:干预组在 USG 引导下插入 UVC,对照组盲插 UVC:结果:在 112 名登记的新生儿中,58 名新生儿在 USG 引导组,54 名新生儿在盲法组。干预组和对照组的失败率无明显差异(20% 对 29% [RR:0.69,95% CI:0.36-1.33])。USG 对定位尖端位置的敏感性和特异性分别为 97% 和 46.8%。USG 组和盲法组的平均手术时间分别为 8.9 分钟和 8.3 分钟(P 值为 0.56):结论:USG 并不能降低脐导管插入过程中的失败率。结论:USG 并不能降低插入脐导管时的失败率,但作为一种安全、无创的程序,在配备了便携式 USG 的新生儿重症监护室中,USG 可被视为 CXR 的一种辅助方式,用于指导 UVC 插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Insertion with Blind Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Ultrasonography (USG) can be used in neonates to manipulate and place the umbilical catheter in the correct position. Although chest radiograph (CXR) is the gold standard, a noninvasive method like USG without radiation exposure may be an alternative bedside armamentarium to the clinician. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether USG-guided umbilical venous catheter (UVC) insertion is superior to the conventional method for the successful insertion of UVC.

Method: The neonates born between 25 and 42 weeks of gestation requiring parenteral fluids and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between September 2020 and November 2022 were randomized in two weight-based strata: ≤1,200 and >1,200 g. USG-guided UVC insertion was done in the intervention group and blind UVC insertion was done in the control group.

Results: Out of 112 enrolled neonates, 58 were in the USG-guided group and 54 in the blind group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the intervention and control groups (20% versus 29% [RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.36-1.33]). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in locating tip position were 97 and 46.8%, respectively. The mean procedure time in USG and blind groups was 8.9 and 8.3 min, respectively (p value 0.56).

Conclusion: USG does not reduce the failure rates during the insertion of umbilical catheters. However, being a safe, noninvasive procedure, it can be considered a rescue modality to CXR in NICUs equipped with portable USG for guiding UVC insertion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信