寻求提供大剂量利福平:吸入式方法是否有用?

Expert opinion on drug delivery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1080/17425247.2024.2301931
Prakash Khadka, Jack Dummer, Philip C Hill, Shyamal C Das
{"title":"寻求提供大剂量利福平:吸入式方法是否有用?","authors":"Prakash Khadka, Jack Dummer, Philip C Hill, Shyamal C Das","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2024.2301931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health problem that poses a challenge to global treatment programs. Rifampicin is a potent and highly effective drug for TB treatment; however, higher oral doses than the standard dose (10 mg/kg/day) rifampicin may offer better efficacy in TB treatment.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>High oral dose rifampicin is not implemented in anti-TB regimens yet and requires about a 3-fold increase in dose for increased efficacy. We discuss inhaled delivery of rifampicin as an alternative or adjunct to oral high-dose rifampicin. Clinical results of safety, tolerability, and patient compliance with antibiotic dry powder inhalers are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Clinical trials suggest that an approximately 3-fold increase in the standard oral dose of rifampicin may be required for better clinical outcomes. On the other hand, animal studies suggest that inhaled rifampicin can deliver a high concentration of the drug to the lungs and achieve approximately double the plasma concentration than that from oral rifampicin. Clinical trials on inhaled antibiotics suggest that dry powder inhalation is a patient-friendly and well-tolerated approach in treating respiratory infections compared to conventional treatments. Rifampicin, a well-known anti-TB drug given orally, is a good candidate for clinical development as a dry powder inhaler.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"31-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The quest to deliver high-dose rifampicin: can the inhaled approach help?\",\"authors\":\"Prakash Khadka, Jack Dummer, Philip C Hill, Shyamal C Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425247.2024.2301931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health problem that poses a challenge to global treatment programs. Rifampicin is a potent and highly effective drug for TB treatment; however, higher oral doses than the standard dose (10 mg/kg/day) rifampicin may offer better efficacy in TB treatment.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>High oral dose rifampicin is not implemented in anti-TB regimens yet and requires about a 3-fold increase in dose for increased efficacy. We discuss inhaled delivery of rifampicin as an alternative or adjunct to oral high-dose rifampicin. Clinical results of safety, tolerability, and patient compliance with antibiotic dry powder inhalers are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Clinical trials suggest that an approximately 3-fold increase in the standard oral dose of rifampicin may be required for better clinical outcomes. On the other hand, animal studies suggest that inhaled rifampicin can deliver a high concentration of the drug to the lungs and achieve approximately double the plasma concentration than that from oral rifampicin. Clinical trials on inhaled antibiotics suggest that dry powder inhalation is a patient-friendly and well-tolerated approach in treating respiratory infections compared to conventional treatments. Rifampicin, a well-known anti-TB drug given orally, is a good candidate for clinical development as a dry powder inhaler.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert opinion on drug delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"31-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert opinion on drug delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2024.2301931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2024.2301931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:结核病(TB)是一个全球性的健康问题,给全球治疗计划带来了挑战。利福平是一种强效、高效的结核病治疗药物;然而,比标准剂量(10 毫克/千克/天)利福平更高的口服剂量可能会为结核病治疗提供更好的疗效:大剂量口服利福平尚未应用于抗结核治疗方案中,需要增加约 3 倍的剂量才能提高疗效。我们讨论了吸入给药利福平作为口服大剂量利福平的替代或辅助疗法。专家意见:临床试验表明,要取得更好的临床效果,可能需要将利福平的标准口服剂量增加约 3 倍。另一方面,动物实验表明,吸入利福平可以向肺部输送高浓度的药物,血浆浓度约为口服利福平的两倍。关于吸入式抗生素的临床试验表明,与传统治疗方法相比,干粉吸入法是一种方便患者且耐受性良好的治疗呼吸道感染的方法。利福平是一种著名的口服抗结核药物,是干粉吸入剂临床开发的理想候选药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The quest to deliver high-dose rifampicin: can the inhaled approach help?

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health problem that poses a challenge to global treatment programs. Rifampicin is a potent and highly effective drug for TB treatment; however, higher oral doses than the standard dose (10 mg/kg/day) rifampicin may offer better efficacy in TB treatment.

Areas covered: High oral dose rifampicin is not implemented in anti-TB regimens yet and requires about a 3-fold increase in dose for increased efficacy. We discuss inhaled delivery of rifampicin as an alternative or adjunct to oral high-dose rifampicin. Clinical results of safety, tolerability, and patient compliance with antibiotic dry powder inhalers are reviewed.

Expert opinion: Clinical trials suggest that an approximately 3-fold increase in the standard oral dose of rifampicin may be required for better clinical outcomes. On the other hand, animal studies suggest that inhaled rifampicin can deliver a high concentration of the drug to the lungs and achieve approximately double the plasma concentration than that from oral rifampicin. Clinical trials on inhaled antibiotics suggest that dry powder inhalation is a patient-friendly and well-tolerated approach in treating respiratory infections compared to conventional treatments. Rifampicin, a well-known anti-TB drug given orally, is a good candidate for clinical development as a dry powder inhaler.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信