关于外用多潘松治疗德卡尔瓦毛囊炎的评论

Q2 Medicine
International Journal of Trichology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22
Ralph Michel Trüeb, Ngoc-Nhi Catharina Luu, Hudson Dutra Rezende
{"title":"关于外用多潘松治疗德卡尔瓦毛囊炎的评论","authors":"Ralph Michel Trüeb, Ngoc-Nhi Catharina Luu, Hudson Dutra Rezende","doi":"10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Folliculitis decalvans (FD) represents a chronic and recurrent pustulofollicular scalp inflammation resulting in scarring alopecia. The presence of a bacterial bioflilm at the interface of the hair shaft may provide an explanation for the chronicity and high relapse rate of FD, even after prolonged systemic antibiotic treatments. We originally read with enthusiasm Melián-Olivera <i>et al</i>.'s retrospective study of patients with FD treated with topical dapsone published in the <i>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</i>. However, we experienced an unsuccessful trial of 5% dapsone gel in a patient with FD resulting in worsening of the disease with a pustular flareup and questioned why positive study reports with novel therapeutic options in dermatology often fail in practice. The authors admitted the limitations of their study: small sample size, retrospective, uncontrolled nature of the study, and concomitant use of other treatments. Clinical research ultimately aims at improving the patient outcome. For this purpose, trials must evaluate the outcomes that genuinely reflect the clinical utility of drugs. Therefore, we postulate stricter criteria for treatment trials and statistics in dermatology before publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals to avoid frustrations of physicians and patients alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":14417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trichology","volume":"15 3","pages":"88-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on Topical Dapsone for Folliculitis Decalvans.\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Michel Trüeb, Ngoc-Nhi Catharina Luu, Hudson Dutra Rezende\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Folliculitis decalvans (FD) represents a chronic and recurrent pustulofollicular scalp inflammation resulting in scarring alopecia. The presence of a bacterial bioflilm at the interface of the hair shaft may provide an explanation for the chronicity and high relapse rate of FD, even after prolonged systemic antibiotic treatments. We originally read with enthusiasm Melián-Olivera <i>et al</i>.'s retrospective study of patients with FD treated with topical dapsone published in the <i>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</i>. However, we experienced an unsuccessful trial of 5% dapsone gel in a patient with FD resulting in worsening of the disease with a pustular flareup and questioned why positive study reports with novel therapeutic options in dermatology often fail in practice. The authors admitted the limitations of their study: small sample size, retrospective, uncontrolled nature of the study, and concomitant use of other treatments. Clinical research ultimately aims at improving the patient outcome. For this purpose, trials must evaluate the outcomes that genuinely reflect the clinical utility of drugs. Therefore, we postulate stricter criteria for treatment trials and statistics in dermatology before publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals to avoid frustrations of physicians and patients alike.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Trichology\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"88-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Trichology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trichology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脱发性毛囊炎(FD)是一种慢性、复发性脓疱性头皮炎症,可导致瘢痕性脱发。毛囊炎是一种慢性、复发性脓疱性毛囊头皮炎症,可导致瘢痕性脱发。毛干界面存在细菌生物膜,这可能是毛囊炎慢性化和高复发率的原因之一,即使经过长期的全身抗生素治疗也是如此。我们最初以极大的热情阅读了 Melián-Olivera 等人在《美国皮肤病学会杂志》(Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology)上发表的关于 FD 患者接受外用达泊松治疗的回顾性研究。然而,我们曾在一位FD患者身上试用过5%的达松凝胶,但并不成功,结果导致病情恶化,脓疱复发,我们不禁要问,为什么皮肤科新疗法的积极研究报告往往在实践中失败。作者承认他们的研究存在局限性:样本量小、研究具有回顾性和不可控性,以及同时使用了其他治疗方法。临床研究的最终目的是改善患者的治疗效果。为此,试验必须对真正反映药物临床效用的结果进行评估。因此,我们建议在同行评审的科学杂志上发表皮肤病学治疗试验和统计数据之前,应制定更严格的标准,以避免医生和患者的失望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment on Topical Dapsone for Folliculitis Decalvans.

Folliculitis decalvans (FD) represents a chronic and recurrent pustulofollicular scalp inflammation resulting in scarring alopecia. The presence of a bacterial bioflilm at the interface of the hair shaft may provide an explanation for the chronicity and high relapse rate of FD, even after prolonged systemic antibiotic treatments. We originally read with enthusiasm Melián-Olivera et al.'s retrospective study of patients with FD treated with topical dapsone published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. However, we experienced an unsuccessful trial of 5% dapsone gel in a patient with FD resulting in worsening of the disease with a pustular flareup and questioned why positive study reports with novel therapeutic options in dermatology often fail in practice. The authors admitted the limitations of their study: small sample size, retrospective, uncontrolled nature of the study, and concomitant use of other treatments. Clinical research ultimately aims at improving the patient outcome. For this purpose, trials must evaluate the outcomes that genuinely reflect the clinical utility of drugs. Therefore, we postulate stricter criteria for treatment trials and statistics in dermatology before publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals to avoid frustrations of physicians and patients alike.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信