人工智能和客观函数方法可确定河道的满滩范围

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jonathan Garber, Karen Thompson, Matthew J. Burns, Joshphar Kunapo, Geordie Z. Zhang, Kathryn Russell
{"title":"人工智能和客观函数方法可确定河道的满滩范围","authors":"Jonathan Garber, Karen Thompson, Matthew J. Burns, Joshphar Kunapo, Geordie Z. Zhang, Kathryn Russell","doi":"10.1029/2023wr035269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bankfull channel extents are of fundamental importance in fluvial geomorphology, to describe the geomorphic character of a river, and to provide a boundary for further processing of morphologic and hydraulic attributes. With ever-increasing availability of high-resolution spatial data (e.g., lidar, aerial photography), manual delineation of channel extents is a bottleneck which limits the geomorphic insights that can be gained from that data. To address this limitation, we developed and tested two automated channel delineation methods that define bankfull according to different conceptualisations of bankfull extent: (a) a cross-sectional method called HydXS that identifies the elevation which maximizes hydraulic depth (cross-section area/wetted width); and (b) a neural network image segmentation model based on a pretrained model (ResNet-18), retrained with images derived from a digital elevation model. The cross-sectional method outperformed the neural network method overall. Its prediction accuracy varied according to channel size and type, with overall precision of 0.87 and recall of 0.80. The neural network method was strongest in larger streams, and outperformed the cross-sectional method in channel sections with inset benches. A tool to delineate morphological bankfull conditions can allow us to more efficiently implement high-resolution and large-scale analyses of channel morphology (e.g., regional hydraulic geometry, channel evolution, physical complexity/habitat surveys), and improve management of fluvial geomorphology and stressors.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Objective-Function Methods Can Identify Bankfull River Channel Extents\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Garber, Karen Thompson, Matthew J. Burns, Joshphar Kunapo, Geordie Z. Zhang, Kathryn Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023wr035269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bankfull channel extents are of fundamental importance in fluvial geomorphology, to describe the geomorphic character of a river, and to provide a boundary for further processing of morphologic and hydraulic attributes. With ever-increasing availability of high-resolution spatial data (e.g., lidar, aerial photography), manual delineation of channel extents is a bottleneck which limits the geomorphic insights that can be gained from that data. To address this limitation, we developed and tested two automated channel delineation methods that define bankfull according to different conceptualisations of bankfull extent: (a) a cross-sectional method called HydXS that identifies the elevation which maximizes hydraulic depth (cross-section area/wetted width); and (b) a neural network image segmentation model based on a pretrained model (ResNet-18), retrained with images derived from a digital elevation model. The cross-sectional method outperformed the neural network method overall. Its prediction accuracy varied according to channel size and type, with overall precision of 0.87 and recall of 0.80. The neural network method was strongest in larger streams, and outperformed the cross-sectional method in channel sections with inset benches. A tool to delineate morphological bankfull conditions can allow us to more efficiently implement high-resolution and large-scale analyses of channel morphology (e.g., regional hydraulic geometry, channel evolution, physical complexity/habitat surveys), and improve management of fluvial geomorphology and stressors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr035269\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr035269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

满岸河道范围在河道地貌学中至关重要,它可以描述河流的地貌特征,并为进一步处理形态和水力属性提供边界。随着高分辨率空间数据(如激光雷达、航空摄影)的日益普及,人工划定河道范围成为一个瓶颈,限制了从这些数据中获得地貌学见解。为解决这一局限性,我们开发并测试了两种自动渠道划分方法,根据不同的满滩范围概念定义满滩:(a)一种名为 HydXS 的横截面方法,可识别最大水深(横截面面积/湿润宽度)的高程;(b)一种基于预训练模型(ResNet-18)的神经网络图像分割模型,该模型使用数字高程模型生成的图像进行再训练。横断面方法的总体性能优于神经网络方法。它的预测精度因通道大小和类型而异,总体精度为 0.87,召回率为 0.80。在较大的河道中,神经网络法的预测能力最强,而在有嵌入式河床的河道断面中,神经网络法的预测能力则优于横断面法。有了划分形态满岸条件的工具,我们就能更有效地对河道形态(如区域水力几何、河道演变、物理复杂性/生境调查)进行高分辨率和大规模的分析,并改进对河道地貌和压力因素的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence and Objective-Function Methods Can Identify Bankfull River Channel Extents
Bankfull channel extents are of fundamental importance in fluvial geomorphology, to describe the geomorphic character of a river, and to provide a boundary for further processing of morphologic and hydraulic attributes. With ever-increasing availability of high-resolution spatial data (e.g., lidar, aerial photography), manual delineation of channel extents is a bottleneck which limits the geomorphic insights that can be gained from that data. To address this limitation, we developed and tested two automated channel delineation methods that define bankfull according to different conceptualisations of bankfull extent: (a) a cross-sectional method called HydXS that identifies the elevation which maximizes hydraulic depth (cross-section area/wetted width); and (b) a neural network image segmentation model based on a pretrained model (ResNet-18), retrained with images derived from a digital elevation model. The cross-sectional method outperformed the neural network method overall. Its prediction accuracy varied according to channel size and type, with overall precision of 0.87 and recall of 0.80. The neural network method was strongest in larger streams, and outperformed the cross-sectional method in channel sections with inset benches. A tool to delineate morphological bankfull conditions can allow us to more efficiently implement high-resolution and large-scale analyses of channel morphology (e.g., regional hydraulic geometry, channel evolution, physical complexity/habitat surveys), and improve management of fluvial geomorphology and stressors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信