疫苗知识对疫苗接种意向和接种状况的预测效果如何?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848
Claudia Isonne, Jessica Iera, Antonio Sciurti, Erika Renzi, Maria Roberta De Blasiis, Carolina Marzuillo, Paolo Villari, Valentina Baccolini
{"title":"疫苗知识对疫苗接种意向和接种状况的预测效果如何?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Claudia Isonne, Jessica Iera, Antonio Sciurti, Erika Renzi, Maria Roberta De Blasiis, Carolina Marzuillo, Paolo Villari, Valentina Baccolini","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2300848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Isonne, Jessica Iera, Antonio Sciurti, Erika Renzi, Maria Roberta De Blasiis, Carolina Marzuillo, Paolo Villari, Valentina Baccolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2300848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述量化了疫苗知识(VL)与疫苗接种意向和状况之间的关联。检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science。任何在 2022 年 12 月之前发表的、调查过相关关联的研究均符合条件。对于每种结果,文章根据接种的疫苗进行分组,并对结果进行叙述性综合。反方差随机效应模型用于比较两组(愿意接种与不愿意接种,接种与未接种)之间 VL 领域的标准化平均值。对 18 项研究的综述显示,VL 可有力地预测接种意愿,而其与接种状况的关联性较弱,几乎不显著,这表明其他因素影响了实际的疫苗接种率。然而,鉴于现有证据的稀缺性、所采用方法的异质性以及所纳入研究的一些局限性,应开展进一步的研究以确认 VL 在疫苗接种决策过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
489
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信