多聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPis)作为新诊断和对铂敏感的复发性卵巢癌 BRCA 突变状态维持疗法的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2023.2298832
Shulin Zhou, Yi Jiang, Chengyan Luo, Lin Yuan
{"title":"多聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPis)作为新诊断和对铂敏感的复发性卵巢癌 BRCA 突变状态维持疗法的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Shulin Zhou, Yi Jiang, Chengyan Luo, Lin Yuan","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2023.2298832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on <i>BRCA</i> mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42021288932.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance therapy for newly-diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with <i>BRCA</i> mutational status: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shulin Zhou, Yi Jiang, Chengyan Luo, Lin Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2023.2298832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on <i>BRCA</i> mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42021288932.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2023.2298832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2023.2298832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:聚二磷酸腺苷[ADP]-核糖聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)治疗卵巢癌(OC)的方法日新月异。本研究旨在比较现有PARPi作为新诊断卵巢癌患者和铂敏感复发(PSR)卵巢癌患者BRCA突变状态维持治疗的疗效和总体安全性:从PubMed和Embase系统检索了截至2022年5月31日的相关RCT。以BRCA突变状态为基础的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),以及不考虑突变的不良事件(AEs)为疗效和安全性终点:在新诊断的BRCAm-OC患者中,奥拉帕利(HR:0.33;95%置信区间[CI]:0.25,0.43)和其他PARPis[尼拉帕利(HR:0.40;95% CI:0.29,0.55)、鲁卡帕利(HR:0.40;95% CI:0.21,0.76)和维利帕利(HR:0.44;95% CI:0.28,0.69)]与安慰剂相比,对PFS有统计学意义的影响。在 BRCAm-PSROC 患者中,与其他 PARPis 相比,Olaparib 对 OS 有明显的益处(HR:0.69;95% CI:0.54,0.88)。在 BRCAwt-PSR OC 患者中,Olaparib 比其他 PARPis 对 OS 更有利(HR:0.84;95% CI:0.57,1.22)。总体而言,所有 PARPis 的安全性均可接受:结论:所有 PARPis 均有明显疗效,其中奥拉帕利对新诊断和 PSR OC 妇女的疗效更大:注册号:CRD42021288932。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance therapy for newly-diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with BRCA mutational status: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients.

Research design and methods: Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on BRCA mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints.

Results: In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable.

Conclusion: All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women.

Registration: CRD42021288932.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信