使用计算机断层扫描冠状动脉钙化评分预测癌症患者的心血管事件:一项回顾性队列分析。

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sinal Patel, Francisco X Franco, Malcolm McDonald, Carlos Rivera, Bernardo Perez-Villa, Patrick Collier, Rohit Moudgil, Neha Gupta, Diego B Sadler
{"title":"使用计算机断层扫描冠状动脉钙化评分预测癌症患者的心血管事件:一项回顾性队列分析。","authors":"Sinal Patel, Francisco X Franco, Malcolm McDonald, Carlos Rivera, Bernardo Perez-Villa, Patrick Collier, Rohit Moudgil, Neha Gupta, Diego B Sadler","doi":"10.1186/s40959-023-00196-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CT- coronary calcium score, is one of the most studied and widely available modalities in cardiovascular medicine. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is an established predictor of coronary artery disease. The 'standard of care' diagnostic modality to measure CACS is ECG-gated Cardiac Multi-Detector Computed Tomography. There is convincing evidence of a strong association between CACS and major cardiovascular (CV) events in asymptomatic individuals. Cancer patients (C) may have a higher risk for CV disease than non-cancer patients (NC) related not only to cancer treatments but also to shared biological factors and pathways. Thus, identifying tools for early detection of CV disease in this population is of utmost importance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with patients from Cleveland Clinic Florida and Ohio who had CACS from 2017 to 2021. Patients who had cancer diagnosis prior to CACS were matched to NC for age and sex. CV events after their index CACS events were compared between C and NC, and matched control and propensity analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten thousand seven hundred forty-two patients had CACS; 703 cancer patients had CACS and were eligible. Extensive CACS (> 400) were significantly higher in cancer, 94 (13.37%) vs non-cancer patients, 76 (10.83%), P = 0.011. Furthermore, after propensity matched analysis, CACS > 400 was 14.8% in C vs 9.6% in NC, P =  < 0.05. CV events were similar in both cohorts (p = NS), despite less CV risk factors in cancer patients (P =  < 0.05). For the combined moderate (101-400) & extensive (> 400) CACS, the prevalence of stroke and peripheral arterial disease, a marker of systemic atherosclerosis, was significantly higher in patients with cancer (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite having fewer CV risk factors in our study, similar CACS in cancer patients are suggestive of a higher prevalence of CV disease independent of traditional risk factors. High CACS and the overall prevalence of vascular events were more frequent in patients with cancer. Higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular accident further suggests the increased atherosclerotic burden in C.</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of computed tomography coronary calcium score for prediction of cardiovascular events in cancer patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sinal Patel, Francisco X Franco, Malcolm McDonald, Carlos Rivera, Bernardo Perez-Villa, Patrick Collier, Rohit Moudgil, Neha Gupta, Diego B Sadler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40959-023-00196-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CT- coronary calcium score, is one of the most studied and widely available modalities in cardiovascular medicine. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is an established predictor of coronary artery disease. The 'standard of care' diagnostic modality to measure CACS is ECG-gated Cardiac Multi-Detector Computed Tomography. There is convincing evidence of a strong association between CACS and major cardiovascular (CV) events in asymptomatic individuals. Cancer patients (C) may have a higher risk for CV disease than non-cancer patients (NC) related not only to cancer treatments but also to shared biological factors and pathways. Thus, identifying tools for early detection of CV disease in this population is of utmost importance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with patients from Cleveland Clinic Florida and Ohio who had CACS from 2017 to 2021. Patients who had cancer diagnosis prior to CACS were matched to NC for age and sex. CV events after their index CACS events were compared between C and NC, and matched control and propensity analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten thousand seven hundred forty-two patients had CACS; 703 cancer patients had CACS and were eligible. Extensive CACS (> 400) were significantly higher in cancer, 94 (13.37%) vs non-cancer patients, 76 (10.83%), P = 0.011. Furthermore, after propensity matched analysis, CACS > 400 was 14.8% in C vs 9.6% in NC, P =  < 0.05. CV events were similar in both cohorts (p = NS), despite less CV risk factors in cancer patients (P =  < 0.05). For the combined moderate (101-400) & extensive (> 400) CACS, the prevalence of stroke and peripheral arterial disease, a marker of systemic atherosclerosis, was significantly higher in patients with cancer (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite having fewer CV risk factors in our study, similar CACS in cancer patients are suggestive of a higher prevalence of CV disease independent of traditional risk factors. High CACS and the overall prevalence of vascular events were more frequent in patients with cancer. Higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular accident further suggests the increased atherosclerotic burden in C.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-023-00196-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-023-00196-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CT 冠状动脉钙化评分是心血管医学中研究最多、应用最广泛的方法之一。冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)是冠状动脉疾病的公认预测指标。测量 CACS 的 "标准 "诊断方法是心电图引导的心脏多载体计算机断层扫描。有令人信服的证据表明,无症状者的 CACS 与重大心血管(CV)事件之间存在密切联系。与非癌症患者(NC)相比,癌症患者(C)罹患心血管疾病的风险可能更高,这不仅与癌症治疗有关,还与共同的生物因素和途径有关。因此,在这一人群中确定早期检测心血管疾病的工具至关重要:我们对来自佛罗里达州克利夫兰诊所和俄亥俄州的 2017 年至 2021 年期间患有 CACS 的患者进行了回顾性队列分析。在 CACS 之前已确诊癌症的患者在年龄和性别上与 NC 匹配。对CACS指数事件后的CV事件在C和NC之间进行比较,并进行匹配对照和倾向分析:结果:1.0742 万名患者接受了 CACS;703 名癌症患者接受了 CACS 并符合条件。癌症患者中,大范围 CACS(> 400)明显高于非癌症患者,前者为 94 例(13.37%),后者为 76 例(10.83%),P = 0.011。此外,经过倾向匹配分析,CACS > 400 在癌症患者中占 14.8%,而在非癌症患者中占 9.6%,P = 400)CACS、中风和外周动脉疾病(全身动脉粥样硬化的标志物)的患病率在癌症患者中明显更高(P 结论:尽管癌症患者的心血管风险因素较少,但他们的心血管疾病患病率明显高于非癌症患者:在我们的研究中,尽管癌症患者的心血管疾病风险因素较少,但其相似的 CACS 表明,在传统风险因素之外,癌症患者的心血管疾病患病率较高。癌症患者的高 CACS 和血管事件的总体发生率更高。外周动脉疾病和脑血管意外的发病率较高,进一步表明癌症患者的动脉粥样硬化负担加重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of computed tomography coronary calcium score for prediction of cardiovascular events in cancer patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Background: CT- coronary calcium score, is one of the most studied and widely available modalities in cardiovascular medicine. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is an established predictor of coronary artery disease. The 'standard of care' diagnostic modality to measure CACS is ECG-gated Cardiac Multi-Detector Computed Tomography. There is convincing evidence of a strong association between CACS and major cardiovascular (CV) events in asymptomatic individuals. Cancer patients (C) may have a higher risk for CV disease than non-cancer patients (NC) related not only to cancer treatments but also to shared biological factors and pathways. Thus, identifying tools for early detection of CV disease in this population is of utmost importance.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with patients from Cleveland Clinic Florida and Ohio who had CACS from 2017 to 2021. Patients who had cancer diagnosis prior to CACS were matched to NC for age and sex. CV events after their index CACS events were compared between C and NC, and matched control and propensity analysis were conducted.

Results: Ten thousand seven hundred forty-two patients had CACS; 703 cancer patients had CACS and were eligible. Extensive CACS (> 400) were significantly higher in cancer, 94 (13.37%) vs non-cancer patients, 76 (10.83%), P = 0.011. Furthermore, after propensity matched analysis, CACS > 400 was 14.8% in C vs 9.6% in NC, P =  < 0.05. CV events were similar in both cohorts (p = NS), despite less CV risk factors in cancer patients (P =  < 0.05). For the combined moderate (101-400) & extensive (> 400) CACS, the prevalence of stroke and peripheral arterial disease, a marker of systemic atherosclerosis, was significantly higher in patients with cancer (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Despite having fewer CV risk factors in our study, similar CACS in cancer patients are suggestive of a higher prevalence of CV disease independent of traditional risk factors. High CACS and the overall prevalence of vascular events were more frequent in patients with cancer. Higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular accident further suggests the increased atherosclerotic burden in C.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardio-oncology
Cardio-oncology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信