子宫内膜癌幸存者的淋巴水肿自我评估。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Causes & Control Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s10552-023-01838-0
Jordyn A Brown, Andrew F Olshan, Victoria L Bae-Jump, Adeyemi A Ogunleye, Shawn Smith, Stephenie Black-Grant, Hazel B Nichols
{"title":"子宫内膜癌幸存者的淋巴水肿自我评估。","authors":"Jordyn A Brown, Andrew F Olshan, Victoria L Bae-Jump, Adeyemi A Ogunleye, Shawn Smith, Stephenie Black-Grant, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1007/s10552-023-01838-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":"771-785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11045305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Jordyn A Brown, Andrew F Olshan, Victoria L Bae-Jump, Adeyemi A Ogunleye, Shawn Smith, Stephenie Black-Grant, Hazel B Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-023-01838-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"771-785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11045305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01838-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01838-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下肢淋巴水肿(LEL)会导致脚踝、腿部和足部肿胀,给子宫内膜癌幸存者带来巨大挑战,影响身体功能和心理健康。LEL诊断方法的不一致导致LEL发病率的估计值差异很大:方法:我们根据幸存者报告的妇科癌症淋巴水肿问卷(GCLQ)以及幸存者和护士报告的腿围测量结果,计算了正在进行的卡罗莱纳子宫内膜癌研究(Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study)中 50 位子宫内膜癌幸存者(27 位白人,23 位黑人)的 LEL 累计发病率:结果:自我腿围测量被认为比较困难,只有 17 名幸存者完成了测量。诊断准确性测试指标(灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值)比较了护士测量的标准[公式:见正文]腿围测量值与 GCLQ 反应的 10% 差异。在诊断后平均约 11 个月时,54% 的幸存者符合基于[公式:见正文]4 GCLQ 切点的 LEL 既定标准,而 24% 的幸存者根据护士测量结果患有 LEL。在[计算公式:见正文]5 GCLQ 症状的临界点上,一致性百分比、灵敏度和特异性接近 60%。然而,在[计算公式:见正文]4 个 GCLQ 症状时,科恩卡帕(一种校正偶然一致的可靠性指标)最高(κ = 0.27):我们的研究结果表明,需要对子宫内膜癌幸存者的 LEL 进行高质量的测量,并使其适用于流行病学研究设计。未来的研究应使用患者报告的调查方法来评估子宫内膜癌幸存者的淋巴水肿负担和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors.

Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors.

Purpose: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates.

Methods: We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study.

Results: Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27).

Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信