基于深度学习的脑磁共振成像序列识别,使用在大型多中心研究队列中训练的模型。

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu, Chandrakanth Jayachandran Preetha, Hagen Meredig, Joerg-Christian Tonn, Michael Weller, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Philipp Vollmuth
{"title":"基于深度学习的脑磁共振成像序列识别,使用在大型多中心研究队列中训练的模型。","authors":"Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu, Chandrakanth Jayachandran Preetha, Hagen Meredig, Joerg-Christian Tonn, Michael Weller, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Philipp Vollmuth","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop a fully automated device- and sequence-independent convolutional neural network (CNN) for reliable and high-throughput labeling of heterogeneous, unstructured MRI data. Materials and Methods Retrospective, multicentric brain MRI data (2179 patients with glioblastoma, 8544 examinations, 63 327 sequences) from 249 hospitals and 29 scanner types were used to develop a network based on ResNet-18 architecture to differentiate nine MRI sequence types, including T1-weighted, postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, susceptibility-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted (low and high <i>b</i> value), and gradient-recalled echo T2*-weighted and dynamic susceptibility contrast-related images. The two-dimensional-midsection images from each sequence were allocated to training or validation (approximately 80%) and testing (approximately 20%) using a stratified split to ensure balanced groups across institutions, patients, and MRI sequence types. The prediction accuracy was quantified for each sequence type, and subgroup comparison of model performance was performed using χ<sup>2</sup> tests. Results On the test set, the overall accuracy of the CNN (ResNet-18) ensemble model among all sequence types was 97.9% (95% CI: 97.6, 98.1), ranging from 84.2% for susceptibility-weighted images (95% CI: 81.8, 86.6) to 99.8% for T2-weighted images (95% CI: 99.7, 99.9). The ResNet-18 model achieved significantly better accuracy compared with ResNet-50 despite its simpler architecture (97.9% vs 97.1%; <i>P</i> ≤ .001). The accuracy of the ResNet-18 model was not affected by the presence versus absence of tumor on the two-dimensional-midsection images for any sequence type (<i>P</i> > .05). Conclusion The developed CNN (<i>www.github.com/neuroAI-HD/HD-SEQ-ID</i>) reliably differentiates nine types of MRI sequences within multicenter and large-scale population neuroimaging data and may enhance the speed, accuracy, and efficiency of clinical and research neuroradiologic workflows. <b>Keywords:</b> MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":"6 1","pages":"e230095"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-based Identification of Brain MRI Sequences Using a Model Trained on Large Multicentric Study Cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu, Chandrakanth Jayachandran Preetha, Hagen Meredig, Joerg-Christian Tonn, Michael Weller, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Philipp Vollmuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryai.230095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To develop a fully automated device- and sequence-independent convolutional neural network (CNN) for reliable and high-throughput labeling of heterogeneous, unstructured MRI data. Materials and Methods Retrospective, multicentric brain MRI data (2179 patients with glioblastoma, 8544 examinations, 63 327 sequences) from 249 hospitals and 29 scanner types were used to develop a network based on ResNet-18 architecture to differentiate nine MRI sequence types, including T1-weighted, postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, susceptibility-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted (low and high <i>b</i> value), and gradient-recalled echo T2*-weighted and dynamic susceptibility contrast-related images. The two-dimensional-midsection images from each sequence were allocated to training or validation (approximately 80%) and testing (approximately 20%) using a stratified split to ensure balanced groups across institutions, patients, and MRI sequence types. The prediction accuracy was quantified for each sequence type, and subgroup comparison of model performance was performed using χ<sup>2</sup> tests. Results On the test set, the overall accuracy of the CNN (ResNet-18) ensemble model among all sequence types was 97.9% (95% CI: 97.6, 98.1), ranging from 84.2% for susceptibility-weighted images (95% CI: 81.8, 86.6) to 99.8% for T2-weighted images (95% CI: 99.7, 99.9). The ResNet-18 model achieved significantly better accuracy compared with ResNet-50 despite its simpler architecture (97.9% vs 97.1%; <i>P</i> ≤ .001). The accuracy of the ResNet-18 model was not affected by the presence versus absence of tumor on the two-dimensional-midsection images for any sequence type (<i>P</i> > .05). Conclusion The developed CNN (<i>www.github.com/neuroAI-HD/HD-SEQ-ID</i>) reliably differentiates nine types of MRI sequences within multicenter and large-scale population neuroimaging data and may enhance the speed, accuracy, and efficiency of clinical and research neuroradiologic workflows. <b>Keywords:</b> MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e230095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 开发一种独立于设备和序列的全自动卷积神经网络(CNN),用于对异构、非结构化 MRI 数据进行可靠的高通量标记。材料与方法 使用来自 249 家医院和 29 种扫描仪类型的回顾性、多中心脑部 MRI 数据(2179 名胶质母细胞瘤患者、8544 次检查、63 327 个序列)开发了基于 ResNet-18 架构的网络,以区分九种 MRI 序列类型、包括 T1 加权、对比后 T1 加权、T2 加权、流体增强反转恢复、感度加权、表观扩散系数、扩散加权(低和高 b 值)、梯度回波 T2* 加权和动态感度对比相关图像。每个序列的二维中切面图像被分配到训练或验证(约占 80%)和测试(约占 20%)中,采用分层分割法以确保不同机构、患者和 MRI 序列类型的组间平衡。对每种序列类型的预测准确率进行量化,并使用 χ2 检验对模型性能进行分组比较。结果 在测试集上,CNN(ResNet-18)集合模型在所有序列类型中的总体准确率为 97.9%(95% CI:97.6,98.1),从感度加权图像的 84.2%(95% CI:81.8,86.6)到 T2 加权图像的 99.8%(95% CI:99.7,99.9)不等。ResNet-18 模型的准确率明显高于 ResNet-50,尽管其架构更简单(97.9% vs 97.1%;P ≤ .001)。对于任何序列类型,ResNet-18 模型的准确性都不受二维中切面图像上有无肿瘤的影响(P > .05)。结论 开发的 CNN (www.github.com/neuroAI-HD/HD-SEQ-ID) 能可靠地区分多中心和大规模人群神经影像数据中的九种 MRI 序列,可提高临床和研究神经放射学工作流程的速度、准确性和效率。关键词磁共振成像 神经网络 中枢神经系统 脑/脑干 计算机应用-通用(信息学) 卷积神经网络(CNN) 深度学习算法 机器学习算法 本文有补充材料。© RSNA, 2023.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning-based Identification of Brain MRI Sequences Using a Model Trained on Large Multicentric Study Cohorts.

Purpose To develop a fully automated device- and sequence-independent convolutional neural network (CNN) for reliable and high-throughput labeling of heterogeneous, unstructured MRI data. Materials and Methods Retrospective, multicentric brain MRI data (2179 patients with glioblastoma, 8544 examinations, 63 327 sequences) from 249 hospitals and 29 scanner types were used to develop a network based on ResNet-18 architecture to differentiate nine MRI sequence types, including T1-weighted, postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, susceptibility-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted (low and high b value), and gradient-recalled echo T2*-weighted and dynamic susceptibility contrast-related images. The two-dimensional-midsection images from each sequence were allocated to training or validation (approximately 80%) and testing (approximately 20%) using a stratified split to ensure balanced groups across institutions, patients, and MRI sequence types. The prediction accuracy was quantified for each sequence type, and subgroup comparison of model performance was performed using χ2 tests. Results On the test set, the overall accuracy of the CNN (ResNet-18) ensemble model among all sequence types was 97.9% (95% CI: 97.6, 98.1), ranging from 84.2% for susceptibility-weighted images (95% CI: 81.8, 86.6) to 99.8% for T2-weighted images (95% CI: 99.7, 99.9). The ResNet-18 model achieved significantly better accuracy compared with ResNet-50 despite its simpler architecture (97.9% vs 97.1%; P ≤ .001). The accuracy of the ResNet-18 model was not affected by the presence versus absence of tumor on the two-dimensional-midsection images for any sequence type (P > .05). Conclusion The developed CNN (www.github.com/neuroAI-HD/HD-SEQ-ID) reliably differentiates nine types of MRI sequences within multicenter and large-scale population neuroimaging data and may enhance the speed, accuracy, and efficiency of clinical and research neuroradiologic workflows. Keywords: MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信