Ⅰ期第二原发性非小细胞肺癌的叶下切除术:单中心经验。

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Takuma Yotsumoto, Sakashi Fujimori, Souichiro Suzuki, Shinichiro Kikunaga, Toru Niitsuma
{"title":"Ⅰ期第二原发性非小细胞肺癌的叶下切除术:单中心经验。","authors":"Takuma Yotsumoto, Sakashi Fujimori, Souichiro Suzuki, Shinichiro Kikunaga, Toru Niitsuma","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_8_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>More patients are developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the extent of SPLC resection on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated 1,895 patients with lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection from 2011 to 2018. SPLC was diagnosed using the criteria of Martini and Melamed. Patients with pathological stage I SPLC who underwent lobectomy for first primary lung cancer (FPLC) were included in the study. Outcomes and clinical factors that could affect survival were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were eligible for the study. Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection was performed for 10, 32, and 12 patients, respectively. Neither overall nor relapse-free survival was significantly different based on the extent of resection for stage I SPLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that interval between FPLC and SPLC of less than 5 years was an independent risk factors for worse relapse-free survival after SPLC resection (interval: hazard ratio, 0.28; P = 0.048). The median interval from prior resection to secondary resection was 68 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sublobar resection might be a realistic option for stage I SPLC. To realize early detection of SPLC that can undergo radical sublobar resection, the surveillance period after prior resection of FPLC is worth reconsidering.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"41 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublobar resection for metachronous stage I second primary non-small cell lung cancer: A single-centre experience.\",\"authors\":\"Takuma Yotsumoto, Sakashi Fujimori, Souichiro Suzuki, Shinichiro Kikunaga, Toru Niitsuma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_8_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>More patients are developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the extent of SPLC resection on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated 1,895 patients with lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection from 2011 to 2018. SPLC was diagnosed using the criteria of Martini and Melamed. Patients with pathological stage I SPLC who underwent lobectomy for first primary lung cancer (FPLC) were included in the study. Outcomes and clinical factors that could affect survival were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were eligible for the study. Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection was performed for 10, 32, and 12 patients, respectively. Neither overall nor relapse-free survival was significantly different based on the extent of resection for stage I SPLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that interval between FPLC and SPLC of less than 5 years was an independent risk factors for worse relapse-free survival after SPLC resection (interval: hazard ratio, 0.28; P = 0.048). The median interval from prior resection to secondary resection was 68 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sublobar resection might be a realistic option for stage I SPLC. To realize early detection of SPLC that can undergo radical sublobar resection, the surveillance period after prior resection of FPLC is worth reconsidering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung India\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"11-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_8_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_8_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:越来越多的患者罹患第二原发性肺癌(SPLC):越来越多的患者罹患第二原发性肺癌(SPLC)。本研究旨在评估SPLC切除范围对预后的影响:我们回顾性调查了2011年至2018年期间接受肺切除术的1895名肺癌患者。SPLC的诊断采用Martini和Melamed的标准。病理分期为I期的SPLC患者中,接受肺叶切除术的第一原发性肺癌(FPLC)患者被纳入研究范围。对结果和可能影响生存的临床因素进行了评估:54名患者符合研究条件。分别有 10、32 和 12 名患者接受了肺叶切除术、肺段切除术或楔形切除术。I期SPLC患者的总生存率和无复发生存率均未因切除范围的不同而出现明显差异。多变量分析显示,FPLC和SPLC之间的间隔少于5年是SPLC切除术后无复发生存率较差的独立危险因素(间隔:危险比,0.28;P = 0.048)。从先前切除到二次切除的中位间隔为68个月:结论:对I期SPLC而言,叶下切除术可能是一个现实的选择。结论:对于I期SPLC来说,行腔镜下切除术可能是一个现实的选择。为了及早发现可进行根治性腔镜下切除术的SPLC,值得重新考虑先前切除FPLC后的监测期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sublobar resection for metachronous stage I second primary non-small cell lung cancer: A single-centre experience.

Introduction: More patients are developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the extent of SPLC resection on outcomes.

Material and methods: We retrospectively investigated 1,895 patients with lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection from 2011 to 2018. SPLC was diagnosed using the criteria of Martini and Melamed. Patients with pathological stage I SPLC who underwent lobectomy for first primary lung cancer (FPLC) were included in the study. Outcomes and clinical factors that could affect survival were evaluated.

Results: Fifty-four patients were eligible for the study. Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection was performed for 10, 32, and 12 patients, respectively. Neither overall nor relapse-free survival was significantly different based on the extent of resection for stage I SPLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that interval between FPLC and SPLC of less than 5 years was an independent risk factors for worse relapse-free survival after SPLC resection (interval: hazard ratio, 0.28; P = 0.048). The median interval from prior resection to secondary resection was 68 months.

Conclusions: Sublobar resection might be a realistic option for stage I SPLC. To realize early detection of SPLC that can undergo radical sublobar resection, the surveillance period after prior resection of FPLC is worth reconsidering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信