保留肾功能而不影响肿瘤结果:T3期肾细胞癌部分和全部肾切除术的比较研究》(A Comparative Study of Partial and Total Nephrectomies in T3 Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma)。

IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL Pub Date : 2023-12-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15586/jkcvhl.v10i4.290
Ahmed Alasker, Turki Rashed Alnafisah, Mohammad Alghafees, Areez Shafqat, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Abdullah Alhaider, Abdulrahman Alsayyari, Naif Althonayan, Mohammed AlOtaibi, Salman Bin Ofisan, Mohammed Alghamdi, Nasser Albogami, Abdullah Al-Khayal
{"title":"保留肾功能而不影响肿瘤结果:T3期肾细胞癌部分和全部肾切除术的比较研究》(A Comparative Study of Partial and Total Nephrectomies in T3 Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma)。","authors":"Ahmed Alasker, Turki Rashed Alnafisah, Mohammad Alghafees, Areez Shafqat, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Abdullah Alhaider, Abdulrahman Alsayyari, Naif Althonayan, Mohammed AlOtaibi, Salman Bin Ofisan, Mohammed Alghamdi, Nasser Albogami, Abdullah Al-Khayal","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v10i4.290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) in locally advanced, stage T3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to review the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with T3a RCC who underwent PN. We included all patients with pT3a stage RCC undergoing either open, laparoscopic, or robotic PN at our center between January 2015 and 2023. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was utilized to compare nephrectomy types (radical nephrectomy [RN] vs PN). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and a log-rank test. P-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the RN and PN groups, except age (53.0 vs 6.5, respectively; P = 0.012) and body mass index (28.7 vs 34.3, respectively; P = 0.020). Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence (P = 0.597), metastatic progression (P = 0.129), and chemotherapy use (P = 0.367) between nephrectomy types. Patient survival did not differ significantly based on the type of nephrectomy (log-rank P-value = 0.852). Together, our findings indicated that PN and RN yield near-equivalent oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival rates among pT3a RCC patients during a nearly 3-year follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"10 4","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10755761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving Renal Function without Compromising Oncological Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Partial and Total Nephrectomies in T3 Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alasker, Turki Rashed Alnafisah, Mohammad Alghafees, Areez Shafqat, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Abdullah Alhaider, Abdulrahman Alsayyari, Naif Althonayan, Mohammed AlOtaibi, Salman Bin Ofisan, Mohammed Alghamdi, Nasser Albogami, Abdullah Al-Khayal\",\"doi\":\"10.15586/jkcvhl.v10i4.290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) in locally advanced, stage T3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to review the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with T3a RCC who underwent PN. We included all patients with pT3a stage RCC undergoing either open, laparoscopic, or robotic PN at our center between January 2015 and 2023. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was utilized to compare nephrectomy types (radical nephrectomy [RN] vs PN). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and a log-rank test. P-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the RN and PN groups, except age (53.0 vs 6.5, respectively; P = 0.012) and body mass index (28.7 vs 34.3, respectively; P = 0.020). Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence (P = 0.597), metastatic progression (P = 0.129), and chemotherapy use (P = 0.367) between nephrectomy types. Patient survival did not differ significantly based on the type of nephrectomy (log-rank P-value = 0.852). Together, our findings indicated that PN and RN yield near-equivalent oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival rates among pT3a RCC patients during a nearly 3-year follow-up period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"28-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10755761/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v10i4.290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v10i4.290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾部分切除术(PN)对局部晚期 T3 期肾细胞癌(RCC)的实用性存在争议。这项回顾性研究旨在回顾接受肾部分切除术的 T3a 期 RCC 患者的肿瘤和功能预后。我们纳入了2015年1月至2023年期间在本中心接受开腹、腹腔镜或机器人PN手术的所有pT3a期RCC患者。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较肾切除术类型(根治性肾切除术 [RN] vs PN)。采用卡普兰-梅耶图和对数秩检验进行生存期分析。P值小于0.05表示有统计学意义。除年龄(分别为 53.0 vs 6.5;P = 0.012)和体重指数(分别为 28.7 vs 34.3;P = 0.020)外,RN 组和 PN 组的人口统计学特征无明显差异。此外,肾切除术类型之间的局部复发率(P = 0.597)、转移进展率(P = 0.129)和化疗使用率(P = 0.367)也无明显差异。肾切除类型不同,患者生存率也无明显差异(对数秩P值=0.852)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在近 3 年的随访期间,PN 和 RN 在 pT3a RCC 患者的局部复发、转移和总生存率方面产生了近乎相同的肿瘤学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preserving Renal Function without Compromising Oncological Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Partial and Total Nephrectomies in T3 Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) in locally advanced, stage T3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to review the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with T3a RCC who underwent PN. We included all patients with pT3a stage RCC undergoing either open, laparoscopic, or robotic PN at our center between January 2015 and 2023. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was utilized to compare nephrectomy types (radical nephrectomy [RN] vs PN). Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and a log-rank test. P-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the RN and PN groups, except age (53.0 vs 6.5, respectively; P = 0.012) and body mass index (28.7 vs 34.3, respectively; P = 0.020). Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence (P = 0.597), metastatic progression (P = 0.129), and chemotherapy use (P = 0.367) between nephrectomy types. Patient survival did not differ significantly based on the type of nephrectomy (log-rank P-value = 0.852). Together, our findings indicated that PN and RN yield near-equivalent oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival rates among pT3a RCC patients during a nearly 3-year follow-up period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信