单侧唇腭裂患者术前使用改良鼻孔固定器进行鼻齿槽成型术的效果,平均随访 2 年。

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Serap Titiz Yurdakal, Ekrem Oral, İbrahim Erhan Gelgör
{"title":"单侧唇腭裂患者术前使用改良鼻孔固定器进行鼻齿槽成型术的效果,平均随访 2 年。","authors":"Serap Titiz Yurdakal, Ekrem Oral, İbrahim Erhan Gelgör","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) using a modified nostril retainer is a new treatment approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of early nasal molding using this approach with an average follow-up of 2 years in patients with severe unilateral cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 18 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate without genetic syndromes who underwent PNAM with modified nostril retainers. The Grayson technique was employed with an intraoral plate to approximate cleft segments. Nasal molding was initiated before reducing the cleft width to 5 mm. Measurements, including alar base height ratio (ABHR), nasal floor width ratio (NFWR), columellar length ratio (CLR), columellar angle (CA), and nostril axis inclination on the cleft and non-cleft sides (NAI-C and NAI-NC, respectively), were calculated from standard photographs taken before PNAM (T1), after PNAM (T2), after an average of 1.81 months post-surgery (T3), and after an average of 2.2 years after T3 (T4). Pairwise comparisons of values at the four time points were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NFWR, CLR, CA, NAI-C and NAI-NC significantly increased after PNAM (p<0.05). However, no significant change was observed in ABHR (p>0.05) from T1 to T2. These outcomes were maintained at T4, and no patient developed a mega nostril.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a modified nostril retainer for nasal molding appears to provide stability during the high probability of relapse reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"36 4","pages":"254-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding using Modified Nostril Retainers in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at an Average Follow-up of 2 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Serap Titiz Yurdakal, Ekrem Oral, İbrahim Erhan Gelgör\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) using a modified nostril retainer is a new treatment approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of early nasal molding using this approach with an average follow-up of 2 years in patients with severe unilateral cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 18 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate without genetic syndromes who underwent PNAM with modified nostril retainers. The Grayson technique was employed with an intraoral plate to approximate cleft segments. Nasal molding was initiated before reducing the cleft width to 5 mm. Measurements, including alar base height ratio (ABHR), nasal floor width ratio (NFWR), columellar length ratio (CLR), columellar angle (CA), and nostril axis inclination on the cleft and non-cleft sides (NAI-C and NAI-NC, respectively), were calculated from standard photographs taken before PNAM (T1), after PNAM (T2), after an average of 1.81 months post-surgery (T3), and after an average of 2.2 years after T3 (T4). Pairwise comparisons of values at the four time points were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NFWR, CLR, CA, NAI-C and NAI-NC significantly increased after PNAM (p<0.05). However, no significant change was observed in ABHR (p>0.05) from T1 to T2. These outcomes were maintained at T4, and no patient developed a mega nostril.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a modified nostril retainer for nasal molding appears to provide stability during the high probability of relapse reported in the literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"254-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763604/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用改良鼻孔固定器进行术前鼻腔成型(PNAM)是一种新的治疗方法。本研究旨在评估使用这种方法对严重单侧唇腭裂患者进行早期鼻腔成型术的效果,平均随访 2 年:这项回顾性研究纳入了 18 名无遗传综合征的单侧唇腭裂患者,他们都接受了使用改良鼻孔固定器的 PNAM 治疗。采用格雷森技术,用口内板近似唇腭裂节段。在将唇裂宽度缩小到 5 毫米之前,先进行鼻腔成型。根据 PNAM 之前(T1)、PNAM 之后(T2)、手术后平均 1.81 个月(T3)的标准照片,计算出了鼻翼基底高度比(ABHR)、鼻翼底宽度比(NFWR)、犁长度比(CLR)、犁角度(CA)以及鼻翼裂侧和非裂侧的鼻孔轴倾斜度(分别为 NAI-C 和 NAI-NC)。81 个月后 (T3),以及 T3 后平均 2.2 年后 (T4)。对四个时间点的数值进行了配对比较:结果:PNAM 术后,NFWR、CLR、CA、NAI-C 和 NAI-NC 从 T1 到 T2 显著增加(p0.05)。这些结果在 T4 期保持不变,没有患者出现巨型鼻孔:结论:使用改良鼻孔固定器进行鼻腔塑形似乎在文献报道的高复发概率期间提供了稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding using Modified Nostril Retainers in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at an Average Follow-up of 2 Years.

Objective: Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) using a modified nostril retainer is a new treatment approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of early nasal molding using this approach with an average follow-up of 2 years in patients with severe unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Methods: This retrospective study included 18 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate without genetic syndromes who underwent PNAM with modified nostril retainers. The Grayson technique was employed with an intraoral plate to approximate cleft segments. Nasal molding was initiated before reducing the cleft width to 5 mm. Measurements, including alar base height ratio (ABHR), nasal floor width ratio (NFWR), columellar length ratio (CLR), columellar angle (CA), and nostril axis inclination on the cleft and non-cleft sides (NAI-C and NAI-NC, respectively), were calculated from standard photographs taken before PNAM (T1), after PNAM (T2), after an average of 1.81 months post-surgery (T3), and after an average of 2.2 years after T3 (T4). Pairwise comparisons of values at the four time points were conducted.

Results: NFWR, CLR, CA, NAI-C and NAI-NC significantly increased after PNAM (p<0.05). However, no significant change was observed in ABHR (p>0.05) from T1 to T2. These outcomes were maintained at T4, and no patient developed a mega nostril.

Conclusion: The use of a modified nostril retainer for nasal molding appears to provide stability during the high probability of relapse reported in the literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信