有叼草行为史的马的肠道微生物组特征:观察研究

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ana Margarita Arias-Esquivel , Kwang Cheol Jeong , Peixin Fan , Jill Lance , Sally DeNotta , Carissa Wickens
{"title":"有叼草行为史的马的肠道微生物组特征:观察研究","authors":"Ana Margarita Arias-Esquivel ,&nbsp;Kwang Cheol Jeong ,&nbsp;Peixin Fan ,&nbsp;Jill Lance ,&nbsp;Sally DeNotta ,&nbsp;Carissa Wickens","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2023.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cribbing is an oral stereotypic behavior in horses. Cribbing behavior (CB) has been associated with gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and gastric ulceration. This randomized crossover study aimed to evaluate the hypotheses that there would be differences in GI microbiota between horses receiving a gastric health support supplement or a placebo, as well as differences between cribbing horses (CBH) and noncribbing horses (NCBH). Mature Quarter Horses with CB (n = 4) and sex-matched noncribbing controls (NCB; n = 4) were randomly assigned to receive either a GI support supplement (TRT) or a placebo for 21 days, followed by a 2-week washout period. Treatment groups were then switched, and horses were treated for an additional 21 days. Before and after each treatment period, feces and gastric fluid samples were collected for microbiome analysis. Horses were acclimated for 2 weeks before the start of the study, individually stalled for 16 h/d, fed bermudagrass hay (1.2% body weight [BW], dry matter [DM] basis), and concentrated (0.5% BW), and turned out in pairs in paddocks for 8 h/d throughout the study. Fecal microbiota differed between CBH and NCBH (P = 0.001), although microbiota remained unaffected by TRT. No differences were found in the gastric microbiota between CBH and NCBH or between TRT and placebo. Administration of the supplement did not alter the GI environment of NCBH or CBH; however, a link between cribbing and fecal microbiota was found, suggesting that CBH may have a disrupted gut microbiome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 40-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001508/pdfft?md5=f8578284838298d29109c0e3ee020f2e&pid=1-s2.0-S1558787823001508-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut microbiome characteristics of horses with history of cribbing behavior: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"Ana Margarita Arias-Esquivel ,&nbsp;Kwang Cheol Jeong ,&nbsp;Peixin Fan ,&nbsp;Jill Lance ,&nbsp;Sally DeNotta ,&nbsp;Carissa Wickens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jveb.2023.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cribbing is an oral stereotypic behavior in horses. Cribbing behavior (CB) has been associated with gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and gastric ulceration. This randomized crossover study aimed to evaluate the hypotheses that there would be differences in GI microbiota between horses receiving a gastric health support supplement or a placebo, as well as differences between cribbing horses (CBH) and noncribbing horses (NCBH). Mature Quarter Horses with CB (n = 4) and sex-matched noncribbing controls (NCB; n = 4) were randomly assigned to receive either a GI support supplement (TRT) or a placebo for 21 days, followed by a 2-week washout period. Treatment groups were then switched, and horses were treated for an additional 21 days. Before and after each treatment period, feces and gastric fluid samples were collected for microbiome analysis. Horses were acclimated for 2 weeks before the start of the study, individually stalled for 16 h/d, fed bermudagrass hay (1.2% body weight [BW], dry matter [DM] basis), and concentrated (0.5% BW), and turned out in pairs in paddocks for 8 h/d throughout the study. Fecal microbiota differed between CBH and NCBH (P = 0.001), although microbiota remained unaffected by TRT. No differences were found in the gastric microbiota between CBH and NCBH or between TRT and placebo. Administration of the supplement did not alter the GI environment of NCBH or CBH; however, a link between cribbing and fecal microbiota was found, suggesting that CBH may have a disrupted gut microbiome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 40-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001508/pdfft?md5=f8578284838298d29109c0e3ee020f2e&pid=1-s2.0-S1558787823001508-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001508\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摇铃是一种刻板的口腔行为,马匹会将门牙放在固定物体上,拱起脖子,拉扯物体,并发出可闻的咕噜声。舔舐行为(CB)与胃肠道(GI)功能障碍和胃溃疡有关。这项随机交叉研究旨在评估以下假设:接受胃健康支持补充剂或安慰剂的马匹之间的胃肠道微生物群是否存在差异,以及摇铃马(CBH)和不摇铃马(NCBH)之间的差异。患有CB的成年四级马(n = 4)和性别匹配的非乱叫对照组(NCB;n = 4)被随机分配接受胃肠道健康支持补充剂(TRT)或安慰剂治疗,为期21天,然后是2周的冲洗期。然后交换治疗组,马匹再接受 21 天的治疗。在每个治疗期前后,收集粪便和胃液样本进行微生物组分析。在研究开始前,先让马适应两周,每天单独圈养 16 小时,喂食百慕大草干草 [1.2% BW,DM] 和精料 [0.5% BW],在整个研究期间,马匹成对在围场中放养 8 小时。粪便微生物群在 CBH 和 NCBH 之间存在差异(P = 0.001),但微生物群不受 TRT 的影响。在胃微生物群方面,CBH 和 NCBH 之间以及 TRT 和安慰剂之间均未发现差异。补充剂的服用并没有改变 NCBH 或 CBH 的胃肠道环境;但是,研究人员发现了啼哭与粪便微生物群之间的联系,这表明 CBH 的肠道微生物群可能受到了破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gut microbiome characteristics of horses with history of cribbing behavior: An observational study

Cribbing is an oral stereotypic behavior in horses. Cribbing behavior (CB) has been associated with gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and gastric ulceration. This randomized crossover study aimed to evaluate the hypotheses that there would be differences in GI microbiota between horses receiving a gastric health support supplement or a placebo, as well as differences between cribbing horses (CBH) and noncribbing horses (NCBH). Mature Quarter Horses with CB (n = 4) and sex-matched noncribbing controls (NCB; n = 4) were randomly assigned to receive either a GI support supplement (TRT) or a placebo for 21 days, followed by a 2-week washout period. Treatment groups were then switched, and horses were treated for an additional 21 days. Before and after each treatment period, feces and gastric fluid samples were collected for microbiome analysis. Horses were acclimated for 2 weeks before the start of the study, individually stalled for 16 h/d, fed bermudagrass hay (1.2% body weight [BW], dry matter [DM] basis), and concentrated (0.5% BW), and turned out in pairs in paddocks for 8 h/d throughout the study. Fecal microbiota differed between CBH and NCBH (P = 0.001), although microbiota remained unaffected by TRT. No differences were found in the gastric microbiota between CBH and NCBH or between TRT and placebo. Administration of the supplement did not alter the GI environment of NCBH or CBH; however, a link between cribbing and fecal microbiota was found, suggesting that CBH may have a disrupted gut microbiome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信