ANDREA CARRIERO, TODD E. CLARK, MASSIMILIANO MARCELLINO
{"title":"用贝叶斯向量自回归捕捉宏观经济尾部风险","authors":"ANDREA CARRIERO, TODD E. CLARK, MASSIMILIANO MARCELLINO","doi":"10.1111/jmcb.13121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many studies using quantile regressions (QRs) have found that downside risk to output growth varies more than upside risk. We show that Bayesian vector autoregressions (BVARs) with stochastic volatility are able to capture tail risks in forecast distributions. Even though the one-step-ahead conditional predictive distributions from the conventional stochastic volatility specification are symmetric, forecasts of downside risks to output growth are more variable than upside risks, and the reverse applies in the case of inflation and unemployment. Overall, BVAR models perform comparably to QR for estimating and forecasting tail risks, complementing BVARs' established performance for forecasting and structural analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Credit and Banking","volume":"56 5","pages":"1099-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing Macro-Economic Tail Risks with Bayesian Vector Autoregressions\",\"authors\":\"ANDREA CARRIERO, TODD E. CLARK, MASSIMILIANO MARCELLINO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmcb.13121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many studies using quantile regressions (QRs) have found that downside risk to output growth varies more than upside risk. We show that Bayesian vector autoregressions (BVARs) with stochastic volatility are able to capture tail risks in forecast distributions. Even though the one-step-ahead conditional predictive distributions from the conventional stochastic volatility specification are symmetric, forecasts of downside risks to output growth are more variable than upside risks, and the reverse applies in the case of inflation and unemployment. Overall, BVAR models perform comparably to QR for estimating and forecasting tail risks, complementing BVARs' established performance for forecasting and structural analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Money Credit and Banking\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"1099-1127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Money Credit and Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmcb.13121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Credit and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmcb.13121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
许多使用量化回归(QRs)的研究发现,产出增长的下行风险比上行风险变化更大。我们的研究表明,具有随机波动率的贝叶斯向量自回归(BVAR)能够捕捉预测分布中的尾部风险。尽管传统随机波动率规范的一步前条件预测分布是对称的,但产出增长的下行风险预测比上行风险预测的变化更大,而通货膨胀和失业率的情况则相反。总体而言,BVAR 模型在估计和预测尾部风险方面的表现与 QR 相当,补充了 BVAR 在预测和结构分析方面的既定表现。
Capturing Macro-Economic Tail Risks with Bayesian Vector Autoregressions
Many studies using quantile regressions (QRs) have found that downside risk to output growth varies more than upside risk. We show that Bayesian vector autoregressions (BVARs) with stochastic volatility are able to capture tail risks in forecast distributions. Even though the one-step-ahead conditional predictive distributions from the conventional stochastic volatility specification are symmetric, forecasts of downside risks to output growth are more variable than upside risks, and the reverse applies in the case of inflation and unemployment. Overall, BVAR models perform comparably to QR for estimating and forecasting tail risks, complementing BVARs' established performance for forecasting and structural analysis.