利用正常模式对地幔中 S 波和 P 波速度异常之间比率的稳健估算

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Federica Restelli , Christophe Zaroli , Paula Koelemeijer
{"title":"利用正常模式对地幔中 S 波和 P 波速度异常之间比率的稳健估算","authors":"Federica Restelli ,&nbsp;Christophe Zaroli ,&nbsp;Paula Koelemeijer","doi":"10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic tomography allows us to image the interior of the Earth. In general, to determine the nature of seismic anomalies, constraints on more than one seismic parameter are required. For example, the ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> between perturbations in <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> (<span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>, respectively) is studied extensively in the lowermost mantle and interpreted in terms of thermal and/or chemical anomalies. However, to jointly interpret tomographic models of variations in <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> or their ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span>, it is essential for them to share the same local resolution. Most existing models do not provide resolution information, and thus cannot guarantee to honour this condition. In addition, uncertainties are typically not provided, making it difficult to robustly interpret the ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>. To overcome these issues, we utilise the recently developed SOLA tomographic method, a variant of the linear Backus–Gilbert inversion scheme. SOLA retrieves local-average model estimates, together with information on their uncertainties, whilst it also provides direct control on model resolution through target kernels. In this contribution, we apply SOLA to normal-mode data with sensitivity to both <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>, as well as density throughout the mantle. Specifically, we aim to develop models of both <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> with the same local resolution. We test our methodology and approach using synthetic tests for various noise cases (random noise, data noise or also additional <em>3D Earth noise</em> due to variations in other physical parameters than the one of interest). We find that the addition of the 3D noise increases the uncertainties in our model estimates significantly, only allowing us to find model estimates in six or four layers for <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>, respectively. While the synthetic tests indicate that no satisfactory density models can be obtained, we easily manage to construct models of <span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> with almost identical resolution, from which the ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> can be robustly inferred. The obtained values of <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> in our synthetic experiments significantly depend on the noise case considered and the method used to calculate it, with the addition of 3D noise always leading to an overestimate of <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span>. When applying our approach to real data, we obtain values of <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> in the range of 2.5–4.0 in the lowest 600 km of the mantle, which are consistent with previous studies. Our model estimates with related resolving kernels and uncertainties can be used to test geodynamic model predictions to provide further insights into the temperature and composition of the mantle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54614,"journal":{"name":"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 107135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001619/pdfft?md5=f7fd9a864f0d0a2ad0ff7365f36ad0f3&pid=1-s2.0-S0031920123001619-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust estimates of the ratio between S- and P-wave velocity anomalies in the Earth's mantle using normal modes\",\"authors\":\"Federica Restelli ,&nbsp;Christophe Zaroli ,&nbsp;Paula Koelemeijer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Seismic tomography allows us to image the interior of the Earth. In general, to determine the nature of seismic anomalies, constraints on more than one seismic parameter are required. For example, the ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> between perturbations in <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> (<span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>, respectively) is studied extensively in the lowermost mantle and interpreted in terms of thermal and/or chemical anomalies. However, to jointly interpret tomographic models of variations in <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> or their ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span>, it is essential for them to share the same local resolution. Most existing models do not provide resolution information, and thus cannot guarantee to honour this condition. In addition, uncertainties are typically not provided, making it difficult to robustly interpret the ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>. To overcome these issues, we utilise the recently developed SOLA tomographic method, a variant of the linear Backus–Gilbert inversion scheme. SOLA retrieves local-average model estimates, together with information on their uncertainties, whilst it also provides direct control on model resolution through target kernels. In this contribution, we apply SOLA to normal-mode data with sensitivity to both <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>, as well as density throughout the mantle. Specifically, we aim to develop models of both <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> with the same local resolution. We test our methodology and approach using synthetic tests for various noise cases (random noise, data noise or also additional <em>3D Earth noise</em> due to variations in other physical parameters than the one of interest). We find that the addition of the 3D noise increases the uncertainties in our model estimates significantly, only allowing us to find model estimates in six or four layers for <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span>, respectively. While the synthetic tests indicate that no satisfactory density models can be obtained, we easily manage to construct models of <span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><mi>dln</mi><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> with almost identical resolution, from which the ratio <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> can be robustly inferred. The obtained values of <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> in our synthetic experiments significantly depend on the noise case considered and the method used to calculate it, with the addition of 3D noise always leading to an overestimate of <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span>. When applying our approach to real data, we obtain values of <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> in the range of 2.5–4.0 in the lowest 600 km of the mantle, which are consistent with previous studies. Our model estimates with related resolving kernels and uncertainties can be used to test geodynamic model predictions to provide further insights into the temperature and composition of the mantle.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001619/pdfft?md5=f7fd9a864f0d0a2ad0ff7365f36ad0f3&pid=1-s2.0-S0031920123001619-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001619\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过地震层析成像技术,我们可以对地球内部进行成像。一般来说,要确定地震异常的性质,需要对一个以上的地震参数进行约束。例如,在最下地幔中,vs 和 vp 的扰动(分别为 dlnvs 和 dlnvp)之间的比率 R 被广泛研究,并被解释为热异常和/或化学异常。然而,要联合解释 vs 和 vp 的变化或它们的比值 R 的层析模型,它们必须具有相同的局部分辨率。现有的大多数模型都不提供分辨率信息,因此无法保证满足这一条件。此外,模型通常不提供不确定性信息,因此很难可靠地解释 R=dlnvs/dlnvp 的比率。为了克服这些问题,我们采用了最近开发的 SOLA 层析方法,这是线性 Backus-Gilbert 反演方案的一种变体。SOLA 可检索局部平均模型估计值及其不确定性信息,还可通过目标核直接控制模型分辨率。在本文中,我们将 SOLA 应用于对 vs 和 vp 以及整个地幔密度都很敏感的正常模式数据。具体来说,我们的目标是建立具有相同局部分辨率的 vs 和 vp 模型。我们使用各种噪声情况(随机噪声、数据噪声或因其他物理参数变化而产生的额外三维地球噪声)的合成测试来检验我们的方法和手段。我们发现,三维噪声的加入大大增加了模型估计的不确定性,使我们只能分别在六层或四层找到 vs 和 vp 的模型估计值。虽然合成测试表明无法获得令人满意的密度模型,但我们还是很容易地构建出了分辨率几乎相同的 dlnvs 和 dlnvp 模型,并从中稳健地推断出了比率 R。在我们的合成实验中得到的 R 值在很大程度上取决于所考虑的噪声情况和计算方法,加入三维噪声总是会导致 R 值的高估。当把我们的方法应用于实际数据时,我们在地幔最低 600 公里处得到的 R 值范围在 2.5-4.0 之间,这与以前的研究是一致的。我们的模型估计值以及相关的解析核和不确定性可用于检验地球动力学模型的预测,从而进一步了解地幔的温度和组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robust estimates of the ratio between S- and P-wave velocity anomalies in the Earth's mantle using normal modes

Seismic tomography allows us to image the interior of the Earth. In general, to determine the nature of seismic anomalies, constraints on more than one seismic parameter are required. For example, the ratio R between perturbations in vs and vp (dlnvs and dlnvp, respectively) is studied extensively in the lowermost mantle and interpreted in terms of thermal and/or chemical anomalies. However, to jointly interpret tomographic models of variations in vs and vp or their ratio R, it is essential for them to share the same local resolution. Most existing models do not provide resolution information, and thus cannot guarantee to honour this condition. In addition, uncertainties are typically not provided, making it difficult to robustly interpret the ratio R=dlnvs/dlnvp. To overcome these issues, we utilise the recently developed SOLA tomographic method, a variant of the linear Backus–Gilbert inversion scheme. SOLA retrieves local-average model estimates, together with information on their uncertainties, whilst it also provides direct control on model resolution through target kernels. In this contribution, we apply SOLA to normal-mode data with sensitivity to both vs and vp, as well as density throughout the mantle. Specifically, we aim to develop models of both vs and vp with the same local resolution. We test our methodology and approach using synthetic tests for various noise cases (random noise, data noise or also additional 3D Earth noise due to variations in other physical parameters than the one of interest). We find that the addition of the 3D noise increases the uncertainties in our model estimates significantly, only allowing us to find model estimates in six or four layers for vs and vp, respectively. While the synthetic tests indicate that no satisfactory density models can be obtained, we easily manage to construct models of dlnvs and dlnvp with almost identical resolution, from which the ratio R can be robustly inferred. The obtained values of R in our synthetic experiments significantly depend on the noise case considered and the method used to calculate it, with the addition of 3D noise always leading to an overestimate of R. When applying our approach to real data, we obtain values of R in the range of 2.5–4.0 in the lowest 600 km of the mantle, which are consistent with previous studies. Our model estimates with related resolving kernels and uncertainties can be used to test geodynamic model predictions to provide further insights into the temperature and composition of the mantle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 地学天文-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
18.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched in 1968 to fill the need for an international journal in the field of planetary physics, geodesy and geophysics, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors has now grown to become important reading matter for all geophysicists. It is the only journal to be entirely devoted to the physical and chemical processes of planetary interiors. Original research papers, review articles, short communications and book reviews are all published on a regular basis; and from time to time special issues of the journal are devoted to the publication of the proceedings of symposia and congresses which the editors feel will be of particular interest to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信