{"title":"格劳秀斯与有限责任","authors":"Dave De ruysscher","doi":"10.1163/18760759-44020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grotius’s ideas on proportionate and limited liability, as mentioned in the <jats:italic>Inleidinge</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>De iure belli ac pacis</jats:italic>, were novel in comparison to the civilian doctrine of his time. Grotius drew from sources of local law and statutes regarding maritime law but was nonetheless original in his interpretations. Grotius proposed to consider the liability of co-owners of ships (<jats:italic>reders, exercitores</jats:italic>), who acted as organizers of maritime expeditions, and of others that were participating in these expeditions, as broad. At the same time, their liability was limited to the maximum of the value of the ship and cargo. In this regard, Grotius’s conceptions hinged on a view of a ship’s voyage as engendering a community of risk among all stakeholders. However, in spite of the underlying connections, Grotius did not eradicate all inconsistencies which the originality of his combinations brought forward.","PeriodicalId":42132,"journal":{"name":"Grotiana","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grotius and Limited Liability\",\"authors\":\"Dave De ruysscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18760759-44020002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grotius’s ideas on proportionate and limited liability, as mentioned in the <jats:italic>Inleidinge</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>De iure belli ac pacis</jats:italic>, were novel in comparison to the civilian doctrine of his time. Grotius drew from sources of local law and statutes regarding maritime law but was nonetheless original in his interpretations. Grotius proposed to consider the liability of co-owners of ships (<jats:italic>reders, exercitores</jats:italic>), who acted as organizers of maritime expeditions, and of others that were participating in these expeditions, as broad. At the same time, their liability was limited to the maximum of the value of the ship and cargo. In this regard, Grotius’s conceptions hinged on a view of a ship’s voyage as engendering a community of risk among all stakeholders. However, in spite of the underlying connections, Grotius did not eradicate all inconsistencies which the originality of his combinations brought forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grotiana\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grotiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-44020002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grotiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-44020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
格劳秀斯在《Inleidinge》和《De iure belli ac pacis》中提到的关于比例责任和有限责任的观点,与当时的民事理论相比是新颖的。格劳秀斯借鉴了有关海事法的当地法律和法规,但他的解释仍具有独创性。格劳秀斯建议将作为海上探险组织者的船舶共有人(reders, exercitores)以及参与这些探险的其他人的责任视为广泛的责任。同时,他们的责任仅限于船舶和货物的最大价值。在这方面,格劳秀斯的概念是基于这样一种观点,即船舶航行在所有利益相关者之间产生风险共同体。然而,尽管存在潜在的联系,格劳秀斯并没有消除其组合的独创性所带来的所有不一致之处。
Grotius’s ideas on proportionate and limited liability, as mentioned in the Inleidinge and De iure belli ac pacis, were novel in comparison to the civilian doctrine of his time. Grotius drew from sources of local law and statutes regarding maritime law but was nonetheless original in his interpretations. Grotius proposed to consider the liability of co-owners of ships (reders, exercitores), who acted as organizers of maritime expeditions, and of others that were participating in these expeditions, as broad. At the same time, their liability was limited to the maximum of the value of the ship and cargo. In this regard, Grotius’s conceptions hinged on a view of a ship’s voyage as engendering a community of risk among all stakeholders. However, in spite of the underlying connections, Grotius did not eradicate all inconsistencies which the originality of his combinations brought forward.
期刊介绍:
Grotiana appears under the auspices of the Grotiana Foundation. The journal’s leading objective is the furtherance of the Grotian tradition. It will welcome any relevant contribution to a better understanding of Grotius’ life and works. At the same time close attention will be paid to Grotius’ relevance for present-day thinking about world problems. Grotiana therefore intends to be a forum for exchanges concerning the philosophical, ethical and legal fundamentals of the search for an international order. The journal is to be published annually. At intervals thematic issues will be inserted. The preferred language for papers and reviews is English.