Ioanna Kosmidou, Megan Durkin, Eileen Vella, Neisha DeJesus, Sofia Romero, Rosalyn Gamboa, Paul Jenkins, Brian Shaffer, Richard Steingart, Jennifer Liu
{"title":"癌症和新发与原有心房颤动住院患者的临床疗效。","authors":"Ioanna Kosmidou, Megan Durkin, Eileen Vella, Neisha DeJesus, Sofia Romero, Rosalyn Gamboa, Paul Jenkins, Brian Shaffer, Richard Steingart, Jennifer Liu","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on the prognostic impact of new onset versus preexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine the clinical impact of new onset AF (NOAF) compared with preexistent AF in hospitalized patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with cancer hospitalized over the course of 1 year with clinically manifest new or preexistent AF were enrolled in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center AF registry. The relationship of NOAF to the primary composite outcome of all cause death, cardiovascular (CV) rehospitalization, or cerebrovascular event (CVE), as well as secondary CV endpoints, were analysed using proportional hazards regression. Where applicable, the competing risk of death was accounted for using methodology described by Fine and Gray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 606 patients included in the analysis, 313 (51.7%) had NOAF and 293 (48.3%) had preexistent AF. Patients with NOAF were younger and had less frequent prior history of CV disease compared with patients with preexistent AF. At follow-up, patients with NOAF had a higher adjusted hazard for the primary composite outcome versus patients with prior AF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.13, P = 0.002), as well as the secondary CV composite outcome of clinical AF recurrence, CV death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.57, 2.99, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients with cancer and electrocardiographically manifest new versus preexistent AF, NOAF was associated with a higher risk for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"689-697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer and New versus Preexistent Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Ioanna Kosmidou, Megan Durkin, Eileen Vella, Neisha DeJesus, Sofia Romero, Rosalyn Gamboa, Paul Jenkins, Brian Shaffer, Richard Steingart, Jennifer Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on the prognostic impact of new onset versus preexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine the clinical impact of new onset AF (NOAF) compared with preexistent AF in hospitalized patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with cancer hospitalized over the course of 1 year with clinically manifest new or preexistent AF were enrolled in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center AF registry. The relationship of NOAF to the primary composite outcome of all cause death, cardiovascular (CV) rehospitalization, or cerebrovascular event (CVE), as well as secondary CV endpoints, were analysed using proportional hazards regression. Where applicable, the competing risk of death was accounted for using methodology described by Fine and Gray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 606 patients included in the analysis, 313 (51.7%) had NOAF and 293 (48.3%) had preexistent AF. Patients with NOAF were younger and had less frequent prior history of CV disease compared with patients with preexistent AF. At follow-up, patients with NOAF had a higher adjusted hazard for the primary composite outcome versus patients with prior AF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.13, P = 0.002), as well as the secondary CV composite outcome of clinical AF recurrence, CV death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.57, 2.99, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients with cancer and electrocardiographically manifest new versus preexistent AF, NOAF was associated with a higher risk for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"689-697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于癌症住院患者新发房颤与既往房颤对预后影响的信息十分有限:关于癌症住院患者新发房颤与既往房颤对预后影响的信息十分有限:我们试图确定新发房颤(NOAF)与原有房颤对住院癌症患者的临床影响:纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)心房颤动登记处登记了一年内住院的所有临床表现为新发或原有心房颤动的癌症患者。采用比例危险回归分析了NOAF与全因死亡、心血管(CV)再住院或脑血管事件(CVE)等主要复合结局以及次要CV终点之间的关系。在适用的情况下,采用 Fine 和 Gray 所描述的方法对死亡的竞争风险进行了计算:在纳入分析的 606 名患者中,313 人(51.7%)患有无房颤,293 人(48.3%)患有原有房颤。与原有房颤患者相比,无房颤患者更年轻,既往冠心病病史更少。在随访过程中,无房颤患者与既往有房颤患者相比,其主要综合结果(HR 1.64,95% CI 1.27,2.13,P=0.002)和次要 CV 综合结果(临床房颤复发、CV 死亡、CV 再住院或 CVE)的调整后危险度更高(HR 2.17,95% CI 1.57,2.99,PConclusions:在癌症住院患者中,心电图表现为新发房颤与原有房颤的患者中,NOAF与全因死亡、CV再住院或CVE等主要复合结局的较高风险相关。
Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer and New versus Preexistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Background: There is limited information on the prognostic impact of new onset versus preexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with cancer.
Objectives: We sought to determine the clinical impact of new onset AF (NOAF) compared with preexistent AF in hospitalized patients with cancer.
Methods: All patients with cancer hospitalized over the course of 1 year with clinically manifest new or preexistent AF were enrolled in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center AF registry. The relationship of NOAF to the primary composite outcome of all cause death, cardiovascular (CV) rehospitalization, or cerebrovascular event (CVE), as well as secondary CV endpoints, were analysed using proportional hazards regression. Where applicable, the competing risk of death was accounted for using methodology described by Fine and Gray.
Results: Among 606 patients included in the analysis, 313 (51.7%) had NOAF and 293 (48.3%) had preexistent AF. Patients with NOAF were younger and had less frequent prior history of CV disease compared with patients with preexistent AF. At follow-up, patients with NOAF had a higher adjusted hazard for the primary composite outcome versus patients with prior AF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.13, P = 0.002), as well as the secondary CV composite outcome of clinical AF recurrence, CV death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.57, 2.99, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: In hospitalized patients with cancer and electrocardiographically manifest new versus preexistent AF, NOAF was associated with a higher risk for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.