独立于组织学的药物开发--这是抗癌药物的未来吗?

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Lucinda Billingham , Lynn Brown , Theodor Framke , Alastair Greystoke , Eivind Hovig , Siddhartha Mathur , Philippe Page , Elias Pean , Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani , Richardus Vonk , Sacha Wissink , Hilke Zander , Ruth Plummer
{"title":"独立于组织学的药物开发--这是抗癌药物的未来吗?","authors":"Lucinda Billingham ,&nbsp;Lynn Brown ,&nbsp;Theodor Framke ,&nbsp;Alastair Greystoke ,&nbsp;Eivind Hovig ,&nbsp;Siddhartha Mathur ,&nbsp;Philippe Page ,&nbsp;Elias Pean ,&nbsp;Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani ,&nbsp;Richardus Vonk ,&nbsp;Sacha Wissink ,&nbsp;Hilke Zander ,&nbsp;Ruth Plummer","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF)’s ‘Histology independent drug development – is this the future for cancer drugs?’ workshop was set up to explore the current landscape of histology independent drug development, review the current regulatory landscape and propose recommendations for improving the conduct of future trials.</p><p>The first session considered lessons learnt from previous trials, including innovative solutions for reimbursement. The session explored why overall survival represents the most valuable endpoint, and the importance of duration of response, which can be captured with swimmer and spider plots.</p><p>The second session on biomarker development and treatment optimisation considered current regulations for companion diagnostics, FDA guidance on histology independent drug development in oncology, and the need to establish cut-offs for the biomarker of tumour mutational burden to identify the patients most likely to benefit from PDL1 treatment.</p><p>The third session reviewed novel trial designs, including basket, umbrella and platform trials, and statistical approaches of hierarchical modelling where homogeneity between study cohorts enables information to be borrowed between cohorts. The discussion highlighted the need to agree ‘common assessment standards’ to facilitate pooling of data across studies.</p><p>In the fourth session, the sharing of data sets was recognised as a key step for improving equity of access to precision medicines across Europe. The session considered how the European Health Data Space (EHDS) could streamline access to medical records, emphasizing the importance of introducing greater accountability into the digital space.</p><p>In conclusion the workshop proposed 11 recommendations to facilitate histology agnostic drug development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737223001676/pdfft?md5=4d621ea2b9ee0bf2f290b899f72a94d0&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737223001676-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histology independent drug development – Is this the future for cancer drugs?\",\"authors\":\"Lucinda Billingham ,&nbsp;Lynn Brown ,&nbsp;Theodor Framke ,&nbsp;Alastair Greystoke ,&nbsp;Eivind Hovig ,&nbsp;Siddhartha Mathur ,&nbsp;Philippe Page ,&nbsp;Elias Pean ,&nbsp;Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani ,&nbsp;Richardus Vonk ,&nbsp;Sacha Wissink ,&nbsp;Hilke Zander ,&nbsp;Ruth Plummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF)’s ‘Histology independent drug development – is this the future for cancer drugs?’ workshop was set up to explore the current landscape of histology independent drug development, review the current regulatory landscape and propose recommendations for improving the conduct of future trials.</p><p>The first session considered lessons learnt from previous trials, including innovative solutions for reimbursement. The session explored why overall survival represents the most valuable endpoint, and the importance of duration of response, which can be captured with swimmer and spider plots.</p><p>The second session on biomarker development and treatment optimisation considered current regulations for companion diagnostics, FDA guidance on histology independent drug development in oncology, and the need to establish cut-offs for the biomarker of tumour mutational burden to identify the patients most likely to benefit from PDL1 treatment.</p><p>The third session reviewed novel trial designs, including basket, umbrella and platform trials, and statistical approaches of hierarchical modelling where homogeneity between study cohorts enables information to be borrowed between cohorts. The discussion highlighted the need to agree ‘common assessment standards’ to facilitate pooling of data across studies.</p><p>In the fourth session, the sharing of data sets was recognised as a key step for improving equity of access to precision medicines across Europe. The session considered how the European Health Data Space (EHDS) could streamline access to medical records, emphasizing the importance of introducing greater accountability into the digital space.</p><p>In conclusion the workshop proposed 11 recommendations to facilitate histology agnostic drug development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737223001676/pdfft?md5=4d621ea2b9ee0bf2f290b899f72a94d0&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737223001676-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737223001676\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737223001676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症药物开发论坛(CDDF)的 "组织学独立药物开发--这是癌症药物的未来吗?"研讨会旨在探讨组织学独立药物开发的现状,审查当前的监管情况,并就改进未来试验的开展提出建议。会议探讨了为什么总生存期是最有价值的终点,以及反应持续时间的重要性,这可以通过游泳图和蜘蛛图来捕捉。第二场会议的主题是生物标志物的开发和治疗优化,会议审议了辅助诊断的现行法规、美国食品与药物管理局(FDA)关于肿瘤组学独立药物开发的指南,以及确定肿瘤突变负荷生物标志物临界值的必要性,以确定最有可能从PDL1治疗中获益的患者。第三场会议回顾了新型试验设计,包括篮式试验、伞式试验和平台试验,以及分层建模的统计方法,在分层建模中,研究队列间的同质性可使队列间的信息相互借用。讨论强调有必要达成 "共同评估标准",以便于汇集各项研究的数据。在第四场会议上,与会者认为共享数据集是提高全欧洲精准医疗公平性的关键一步。会议审议了欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)如何简化医疗记录的获取,强调了在数字空间引入更强问责制的重要性。最后,研讨会提出了11项建议,以促进组织学无关药物的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Histology independent drug development – Is this the future for cancer drugs?

The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF)’s ‘Histology independent drug development – is this the future for cancer drugs?’ workshop was set up to explore the current landscape of histology independent drug development, review the current regulatory landscape and propose recommendations for improving the conduct of future trials.

The first session considered lessons learnt from previous trials, including innovative solutions for reimbursement. The session explored why overall survival represents the most valuable endpoint, and the importance of duration of response, which can be captured with swimmer and spider plots.

The second session on biomarker development and treatment optimisation considered current regulations for companion diagnostics, FDA guidance on histology independent drug development in oncology, and the need to establish cut-offs for the biomarker of tumour mutational burden to identify the patients most likely to benefit from PDL1 treatment.

The third session reviewed novel trial designs, including basket, umbrella and platform trials, and statistical approaches of hierarchical modelling where homogeneity between study cohorts enables information to be borrowed between cohorts. The discussion highlighted the need to agree ‘common assessment standards’ to facilitate pooling of data across studies.

In the fourth session, the sharing of data sets was recognised as a key step for improving equity of access to precision medicines across Europe. The session considered how the European Health Data Space (EHDS) could streamline access to medical records, emphasizing the importance of introducing greater accountability into the digital space.

In conclusion the workshop proposed 11 recommendations to facilitate histology agnostic drug development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信