为不适合手术切除的乳腺癌患者提供局部消融放疗

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Daniel Moore-Palhares MD, MSc , Hanbo Chen MD, MPH , Benazir Mir Khan MD , Claire McCann PhD , Sandi Bosnic BA, MRT(T) , Ezra Hahn MD , Hany Soliman MD , Gregory Czarnota MD, PhD , Irene Karam MD , Eileen Rakovitch MD, MSc , Justin Lee MD, MSc , Danny Vesprini MD, MSc
{"title":"为不适合手术切除的乳腺癌患者提供局部消融放疗","authors":"Daniel Moore-Palhares MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Hanbo Chen MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Benazir Mir Khan MD ,&nbsp;Claire McCann PhD ,&nbsp;Sandi Bosnic BA, MRT(T) ,&nbsp;Ezra Hahn MD ,&nbsp;Hany Soliman MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Czarnota MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Irene Karam MD ,&nbsp;Eileen Rakovitch MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Justin Lee MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Danny Vesprini MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patients with breast cancer who are unsuitable for surgical resection are typically managed with palliative systemic therapy alone. We report outcomes of 5-fraction ablative radiation therapy for nonresected breast cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional registry of patients with breast cancer who were unsuitable for resection and underwent 35 to 40 Gy/5 fractions to the primary breast tumor or regional lymph nodes from 2014 to 2021. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of local failure and grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>We reviewed 57 patients who received 61 treatment courses (median age of 81 years; range, 38-99). Unresectable tumor (10%), patient refusal (18%), medical inoperability (35%), and </span>metastatic disease<span> (37%) were the causes of not having surgery. Five patients (8%) had previously undergone adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy. Fifty-four percent (n = 33/61) of treatment courses targeted the breast only, 31% (n = 19/61) both the breast and lymph nodes, and 15% (n = 9/61) the lymph nodes only. Sixty-seven percent (n = 35/52) of the courses that targeted the breast were delivered with partial breast irradiation<span> and 33% (n = 17/52) with whole breast radiation therapy (median dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± simultaneous integrated boost to the primary tumor. Most primary tumors (65%, n = 34/52) and target lymph nodes (61%, n = 17/28) were treated with a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Most treatments (52%) were delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Radiation therapy was delivered daily (20%), every other day (18%), twice weekly (36%), or weekly (26%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 11.4% and grade≥3 toxicity was 15.1%. The grade ≥3 toxicity was 6.5% for IMRT treatments, versus 7.7% for non-IMRT treatments targeting partial breast or lymph nodes (hazard ratio, 1.13, </span></span></span><em>P</em> = .92), versus 38.9% for non-IMRT treatments targeting the entire breast (hazard ratio, 6.91, <em>P</em><span> = .023). All grade ≥3 toxicity cases were radiation dermatitis<span>. No cases of brachial plexopathy were observed.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thirty-five to 40 Gy in 5 fractions is a safe and effective breast stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen and may be an attractive option for patients who are not surgical candidates. Highly conformal techniques (ie, IMRT or partial breast irradiation) were associated with a reduced risk of toxicity and should be the preferred treatment approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locoregional Ablative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Breast Cancer Unsuitable for Surgical Resection\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Moore-Palhares MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Hanbo Chen MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Benazir Mir Khan MD ,&nbsp;Claire McCann PhD ,&nbsp;Sandi Bosnic BA, MRT(T) ,&nbsp;Ezra Hahn MD ,&nbsp;Hany Soliman MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Czarnota MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Irene Karam MD ,&nbsp;Eileen Rakovitch MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Justin Lee MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Danny Vesprini MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patients with breast cancer who are unsuitable for surgical resection are typically managed with palliative systemic therapy alone. We report outcomes of 5-fraction ablative radiation therapy for nonresected breast cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional registry of patients with breast cancer who were unsuitable for resection and underwent 35 to 40 Gy/5 fractions to the primary breast tumor or regional lymph nodes from 2014 to 2021. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of local failure and grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>We reviewed 57 patients who received 61 treatment courses (median age of 81 years; range, 38-99). Unresectable tumor (10%), patient refusal (18%), medical inoperability (35%), and </span>metastatic disease<span> (37%) were the causes of not having surgery. Five patients (8%) had previously undergone adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy. Fifty-four percent (n = 33/61) of treatment courses targeted the breast only, 31% (n = 19/61) both the breast and lymph nodes, and 15% (n = 9/61) the lymph nodes only. Sixty-seven percent (n = 35/52) of the courses that targeted the breast were delivered with partial breast irradiation<span> and 33% (n = 17/52) with whole breast radiation therapy (median dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± simultaneous integrated boost to the primary tumor. Most primary tumors (65%, n = 34/52) and target lymph nodes (61%, n = 17/28) were treated with a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Most treatments (52%) were delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Radiation therapy was delivered daily (20%), every other day (18%), twice weekly (36%), or weekly (26%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 11.4% and grade≥3 toxicity was 15.1%. The grade ≥3 toxicity was 6.5% for IMRT treatments, versus 7.7% for non-IMRT treatments targeting partial breast or lymph nodes (hazard ratio, 1.13, </span></span></span><em>P</em> = .92), versus 38.9% for non-IMRT treatments targeting the entire breast (hazard ratio, 6.91, <em>P</em><span> = .023). All grade ≥3 toxicity cases were radiation dermatitis<span>. No cases of brachial plexopathy were observed.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thirty-five to 40 Gy in 5 fractions is a safe and effective breast stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen and may be an attractive option for patients who are not surgical candidates. Highly conformal techniques (ie, IMRT or partial breast irradiation) were associated with a reduced risk of toxicity and should be the preferred treatment approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850023003466\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850023003466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 不适合手术切除的乳腺癌患者通常只接受姑息性全身治疗。我们报告了对不适合切除的乳腺癌患者进行 5 次分次消融放疗的结果。方法和材料对 2014-2021 年间对原发性乳腺肿瘤和/或区域淋巴结进行 35-40 Gy/5 次分次消融放疗的不适合切除的乳腺癌患者的机构登记进行了回顾性分析。主要结果是局部失败(LF)和≥3级毒性(CTCAE v5.0)的累积发生率。结果我们回顾了接受61个疗程治疗的57名患者(中位年龄81岁,范围38-99岁)。无法切除的肿瘤(10%)、患者拒绝(18%)、内科无法手术(35%)和转移性疾病(37%)是导致患者无法手术的原因。五名患者(8%)曾接受过局部辅助放疗。54%(33/61)的疗程仅针对乳腺,31%(19/61)同时针对乳腺和淋巴结,15%(9/61)仅针对淋巴结。在针对乳腺的疗程中,67%(n=35/52)的疗程采用了乳腺部分照射,33%(n=17/52)的疗程采用了全乳腺放疗(中位剂量为 25Gy,分 5 次进行),并同时对原发肿瘤进行综合增强。大多数原发肿瘤(65%,n=34/52)和靶淋巴结(61%,n=17/28)的治疗剂量为 35 Gy,分 5 次进行。大多数治疗(52%)采用调强放疗(IMRT)。放疗每天一次(20%)、隔天一次(18%)、每周两次(36%)或每周一次(26%)。2年累计LF发生率为11.4%,≥3级毒性为15.1%。IMRT治疗的≥3级毒性为6.5%,而针对部分乳腺和/或淋巴结的非IMRT治疗为7.7%(HR 1.13,P=0.92),针对整个乳腺的非IMRT治疗为38.9%(HR 6.91,P=0.023)。所有≥3级毒性病例均为放射性皮炎。结论35-40 Gy,5 次分割是一种安全有效的乳腺立体定向体放射治疗方案,对于不适合手术的患者来说可能是一种有吸引力的选择。高适形技术(即 IMRT 或乳腺部分照射)可降低毒性风险,应作为首选治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Locoregional Ablative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Breast Cancer Unsuitable for Surgical Resection

Purpose

Patients with breast cancer who are unsuitable for surgical resection are typically managed with palliative systemic therapy alone. We report outcomes of 5-fraction ablative radiation therapy for nonresected breast cancers.

Methods and Materials

This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional registry of patients with breast cancer who were unsuitable for resection and underwent 35 to 40 Gy/5 fractions to the primary breast tumor or regional lymph nodes from 2014 to 2021. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of local failure and grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0).

Results

We reviewed 57 patients who received 61 treatment courses (median age of 81 years; range, 38-99). Unresectable tumor (10%), patient refusal (18%), medical inoperability (35%), and metastatic disease (37%) were the causes of not having surgery. Five patients (8%) had previously undergone adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy. Fifty-four percent (n = 33/61) of treatment courses targeted the breast only, 31% (n = 19/61) both the breast and lymph nodes, and 15% (n = 9/61) the lymph nodes only. Sixty-seven percent (n = 35/52) of the courses that targeted the breast were delivered with partial breast irradiation and 33% (n = 17/52) with whole breast radiation therapy (median dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± simultaneous integrated boost to the primary tumor. Most primary tumors (65%, n = 34/52) and target lymph nodes (61%, n = 17/28) were treated with a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Most treatments (52%) were delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Radiation therapy was delivered daily (20%), every other day (18%), twice weekly (36%), or weekly (26%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 11.4% and grade≥3 toxicity was 15.1%. The grade ≥3 toxicity was 6.5% for IMRT treatments, versus 7.7% for non-IMRT treatments targeting partial breast or lymph nodes (hazard ratio, 1.13, P = .92), versus 38.9% for non-IMRT treatments targeting the entire breast (hazard ratio, 6.91, P = .023). All grade ≥3 toxicity cases were radiation dermatitis. No cases of brachial plexopathy were observed.

Conclusions

Thirty-five to 40 Gy in 5 fractions is a safe and effective breast stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen and may be an attractive option for patients who are not surgical candidates. Highly conformal techniques (ie, IMRT or partial breast irradiation) were associated with a reduced risk of toxicity and should be the preferred treatment approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信