Or Galant, Charles E. Diesendruck and Sabrina Spatari*,
{"title":"批式和流式化学法生产单链纳米粒子对环境影响的差异","authors":"Or Galant, Charles E. Diesendruck and Sabrina Spatari*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Emerging nanoscale materials are under development for multiple high-performance product applications such as advanced polymers. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCNPs) have many promising high-performance uses in catalysts, lubricants, nanoreactors, and biomedical applications; however, synthetic routes to SCNPs are still under development and usually require an excessive amount of solvent, imposing costly environmental impacts. Following our previous experimental study in which we developed a flow process for SCNP production and demonstrated its advantages in productivity and yield over classical batch preparation, in this study we apply prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) methods to evaluate alternative SCNP synthesis routes through a photochemistry process and examine the role of limiting solvent quantity and type used. We compare SCNP production through a flow photochemical process versus a classical batch process. Using a cradle-to-gate system boundary, we compare the performance of different batch and flow processing scenarios, considering solvent recovery through vacuum distillation, atmospheric distillation, and solvent replacement and waste solvent treatment. The results indicate that there are environmental benefits under the flow process over conventionally used batch processes where the solvent is recovered through atmospheric distillation, and toluene is the preferred solvent. In addition, we compare the LCA results to a common green chemistry metric known as the environmental factor and conclude that a green chemistry metric alone is insufficient. Hence, a comprehensive and systematic life cycle approach is needed to understand the environmental impacts of flow chemistry with potential scenarios prior to scaling up production.</p>","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":"28 5","pages":"1607–1617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Impact Differences of Single-Chain Nanoparticle Production by Batch and Flow Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"Or Galant, Charles E. Diesendruck and Sabrina Spatari*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Emerging nanoscale materials are under development for multiple high-performance product applications such as advanced polymers. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCNPs) have many promising high-performance uses in catalysts, lubricants, nanoreactors, and biomedical applications; however, synthetic routes to SCNPs are still under development and usually require an excessive amount of solvent, imposing costly environmental impacts. Following our previous experimental study in which we developed a flow process for SCNP production and demonstrated its advantages in productivity and yield over classical batch preparation, in this study we apply prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) methods to evaluate alternative SCNP synthesis routes through a photochemistry process and examine the role of limiting solvent quantity and type used. We compare SCNP production through a flow photochemical process versus a classical batch process. Using a cradle-to-gate system boundary, we compare the performance of different batch and flow processing scenarios, considering solvent recovery through vacuum distillation, atmospheric distillation, and solvent replacement and waste solvent treatment. The results indicate that there are environmental benefits under the flow process over conventionally used batch processes where the solvent is recovered through atmospheric distillation, and toluene is the preferred solvent. In addition, we compare the LCA results to a common green chemistry metric known as the environmental factor and conclude that a green chemistry metric alone is insufficient. Hence, a comprehensive and systematic life cycle approach is needed to understand the environmental impacts of flow chemistry with potential scenarios prior to scaling up production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"1607–1617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental Impact Differences of Single-Chain Nanoparticle Production by Batch and Flow Chemistry
Emerging nanoscale materials are under development for multiple high-performance product applications such as advanced polymers. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCNPs) have many promising high-performance uses in catalysts, lubricants, nanoreactors, and biomedical applications; however, synthetic routes to SCNPs are still under development and usually require an excessive amount of solvent, imposing costly environmental impacts. Following our previous experimental study in which we developed a flow process for SCNP production and demonstrated its advantages in productivity and yield over classical batch preparation, in this study we apply prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) methods to evaluate alternative SCNP synthesis routes through a photochemistry process and examine the role of limiting solvent quantity and type used. We compare SCNP production through a flow photochemical process versus a classical batch process. Using a cradle-to-gate system boundary, we compare the performance of different batch and flow processing scenarios, considering solvent recovery through vacuum distillation, atmospheric distillation, and solvent replacement and waste solvent treatment. The results indicate that there are environmental benefits under the flow process over conventionally used batch processes where the solvent is recovered through atmospheric distillation, and toluene is the preferred solvent. In addition, we compare the LCA results to a common green chemistry metric known as the environmental factor and conclude that a green chemistry metric alone is insufficient. Hence, a comprehensive and systematic life cycle approach is needed to understand the environmental impacts of flow chemistry with potential scenarios prior to scaling up production.
期刊介绍:
The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.