批式和流式化学法生产单链纳米粒子对环境影响的差异

IF 3.5 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Or Galant, Charles E. Diesendruck and Sabrina Spatari*, 
{"title":"批式和流式化学法生产单链纳米粒子对环境影响的差异","authors":"Or Galant,&nbsp;Charles E. Diesendruck and Sabrina Spatari*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Emerging nanoscale materials are under development for multiple high-performance product applications such as advanced polymers. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCNPs) have many promising high-performance uses in catalysts, lubricants, nanoreactors, and biomedical applications; however, synthetic routes to SCNPs are still under development and usually require an excessive amount of solvent, imposing costly environmental impacts. Following our previous experimental study in which we developed a flow process for SCNP production and demonstrated its advantages in productivity and yield over classical batch preparation, in this study we apply prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) methods to evaluate alternative SCNP synthesis routes through a photochemistry process and examine the role of limiting solvent quantity and type used. We compare SCNP production through a flow photochemical process versus a classical batch process. Using a cradle-to-gate system boundary, we compare the performance of different batch and flow processing scenarios, considering solvent recovery through vacuum distillation, atmospheric distillation, and solvent replacement and waste solvent treatment. The results indicate that there are environmental benefits under the flow process over conventionally used batch processes where the solvent is recovered through atmospheric distillation, and toluene is the preferred solvent. In addition, we compare the LCA results to a common green chemistry metric known as the environmental factor and conclude that a green chemistry metric alone is insufficient. Hence, a comprehensive and systematic life cycle approach is needed to understand the environmental impacts of flow chemistry with potential scenarios prior to scaling up production.</p>","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":"28 5","pages":"1607–1617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Impact Differences of Single-Chain Nanoparticle Production by Batch and Flow Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"Or Galant,&nbsp;Charles E. Diesendruck and Sabrina Spatari*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Emerging nanoscale materials are under development for multiple high-performance product applications such as advanced polymers. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCNPs) have many promising high-performance uses in catalysts, lubricants, nanoreactors, and biomedical applications; however, synthetic routes to SCNPs are still under development and usually require an excessive amount of solvent, imposing costly environmental impacts. Following our previous experimental study in which we developed a flow process for SCNP production and demonstrated its advantages in productivity and yield over classical batch preparation, in this study we apply prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) methods to evaluate alternative SCNP synthesis routes through a photochemistry process and examine the role of limiting solvent quantity and type used. We compare SCNP production through a flow photochemical process versus a classical batch process. Using a cradle-to-gate system boundary, we compare the performance of different batch and flow processing scenarios, considering solvent recovery through vacuum distillation, atmospheric distillation, and solvent replacement and waste solvent treatment. The results indicate that there are environmental benefits under the flow process over conventionally used batch processes where the solvent is recovered through atmospheric distillation, and toluene is the preferred solvent. In addition, we compare the LCA results to a common green chemistry metric known as the environmental factor and conclude that a green chemistry metric alone is insufficient. Hence, a comprehensive and systematic life cycle approach is needed to understand the environmental impacts of flow chemistry with potential scenarios prior to scaling up production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"1607–1617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Process Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前正在开发新兴纳米级材料,用于多种高性能产品应用,如先进聚合物。单链聚合物纳米粒子(SCNPs)在催化剂、润滑剂、纳米反应器和生物医学应用中具有许多前景广阔的高性能用途;然而,SCNPs 的合成路线仍在开发中,通常需要过量的溶剂,对环境造成昂贵的影响。在之前的实验研究中,我们开发了一种用于生产 SCNP 的流动工艺,并证明了它在生产率和产量方面比传统的批量制备工艺更具优势。我们比较了通过流动光化学工艺和传统批量工艺生产 SCNP 的情况。使用 "从摇篮到大门 "的系统边界,我们比较了不同批量和流动加工方案的性能,并考虑了通过真空蒸馏、常压蒸馏以及溶剂替代和废溶剂处理进行溶剂回收的问题。结果表明,与通过大气蒸馏回收溶剂的传统批量工艺相比,流动工艺具有环境效益,甲苯是首选溶剂。此外,我们还将生命周期评估结果与常用的绿色化学指标(即环境因子)进行了比较,得出的结论是仅有绿色化学指标是不够的。因此,在扩大生产规模之前,需要采用全面、系统的生命周期方法来了解流动化学的潜在方案对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Environmental Impact Differences of Single-Chain Nanoparticle Production by Batch and Flow Chemistry

Environmental Impact Differences of Single-Chain Nanoparticle Production by Batch and Flow Chemistry

Environmental Impact Differences of Single-Chain Nanoparticle Production by Batch and Flow Chemistry

Emerging nanoscale materials are under development for multiple high-performance product applications such as advanced polymers. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCNPs) have many promising high-performance uses in catalysts, lubricants, nanoreactors, and biomedical applications; however, synthetic routes to SCNPs are still under development and usually require an excessive amount of solvent, imposing costly environmental impacts. Following our previous experimental study in which we developed a flow process for SCNP production and demonstrated its advantages in productivity and yield over classical batch preparation, in this study we apply prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) methods to evaluate alternative SCNP synthesis routes through a photochemistry process and examine the role of limiting solvent quantity and type used. We compare SCNP production through a flow photochemical process versus a classical batch process. Using a cradle-to-gate system boundary, we compare the performance of different batch and flow processing scenarios, considering solvent recovery through vacuum distillation, atmospheric distillation, and solvent replacement and waste solvent treatment. The results indicate that there are environmental benefits under the flow process over conventionally used batch processes where the solvent is recovered through atmospheric distillation, and toluene is the preferred solvent. In addition, we compare the LCA results to a common green chemistry metric known as the environmental factor and conclude that a green chemistry metric alone is insufficient. Hence, a comprehensive and systematic life cycle approach is needed to understand the environmental impacts of flow chemistry with potential scenarios prior to scaling up production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
251
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信