伴发创伤性脑损伤是创伤性脊髓损伤后存活率、神经功能和功能预后的决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13123
Julio C Furlan
{"title":"伴发创伤性脑损伤是创伤性脊髓损伤后存活率、神经功能和功能预后的决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Julio C Furlan","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) is not infrequently associated with spinal cord injury (SCI), there is relatively scarce information about the effects of concomitant TBI on outcomes after SCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI on survival, and neurological and functional outcomes within the first year after acute traumatic SCI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute spine trauma centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This study includes all individuals who were enrolled into the Third National Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS-3). The study population was classified into SCI + TBI group and SCI-alone group. TBI was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score <15 on admission.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Both groups were compared regarding their survival and neurological outcomes (ie, NASCIS motor, sensory and pain scores) and functional outcome (ie, Functional Independence Measure score) within the first year following SCI. Data analyses were adjusted for major potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 413 individuals in the SCI-alone group and 86 individuals in the SCI + TBI group (17.2%). Both groups were comparable regarding gender distribution (p = .621). However, the SCI + TBI group was older (p < .001), had a higher proportion of complete (p = .006) and cervical SCI (p = .003), and had a higher blood alcohol level (p < .001) than the SCI-alone group. The SCI + TBI group did not significantly differ from the SCI-alone group regarding survival within the first year after SCI (p = .768). Among the survivors, concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI did not significantly affect neurological and functional outcomes at 1 year after SCI in the multiple regression analyses after adjusting for major potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI did not have a significant impact on survival, neurological recovery, and functional outcomes at 1 year after SCI, even though there were some epidemiological differences between SCI-alone and SCI + TBI groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"804-814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concomitant traumatic brain injury as a determinant of survival, and neurological and functional outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Julio C Furlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) is not infrequently associated with spinal cord injury (SCI), there is relatively scarce information about the effects of concomitant TBI on outcomes after SCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI on survival, and neurological and functional outcomes within the first year after acute traumatic SCI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute spine trauma centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This study includes all individuals who were enrolled into the Third National Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS-3). The study population was classified into SCI + TBI group and SCI-alone group. TBI was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score <15 on admission.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Both groups were compared regarding their survival and neurological outcomes (ie, NASCIS motor, sensory and pain scores) and functional outcome (ie, Functional Independence Measure score) within the first year following SCI. Data analyses were adjusted for major potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 413 individuals in the SCI-alone group and 86 individuals in the SCI + TBI group (17.2%). Both groups were comparable regarding gender distribution (p = .621). However, the SCI + TBI group was older (p < .001), had a higher proportion of complete (p = .006) and cervical SCI (p = .003), and had a higher blood alcohol level (p < .001) than the SCI-alone group. The SCI + TBI group did not significantly differ from the SCI-alone group regarding survival within the first year after SCI (p = .768). Among the survivors, concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI did not significantly affect neurological and functional outcomes at 1 year after SCI in the multiple regression analyses after adjusting for major potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI did not have a significant impact on survival, neurological recovery, and functional outcomes at 1 year after SCI, even though there were some epidemiological differences between SCI-alone and SCI + TBI groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"804-814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:虽然脊髓损伤(SCI)并发创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的情况并不少见,但有关并发 TBI 对 SCI 后果影响的信息却相对较少:评估急性创伤性脊髓损伤后第一年内并发轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤对存活率、神经功能和功能预后的影响:设计:回顾性队列研究:参与者:美国的急性脊柱创伤中心:本研究包括所有参加第三次全国脊髓损伤研究(NASCIS-3)的人员。研究人群被分为 SCI+TBI 组和 SCI 单发组。TBI的定义是入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分低于15分:干预措施:不适用:比较两组患者在 SCI 后第一年内的存活率、神经系统结果(即 NASCIS 运动、感觉和疼痛评分)和功能结果(即功能独立性测量评分)。数据分析对主要的潜在混杂因素进行了调整:单独 SCI 组有 413 人,SCI+TBI 组有 86 人(17.2%)。两组在性别分布方面具有可比性(P=0.6207)。然而,SCI+TBI 组的年龄更大(p 结论:本研究结果表明,尽管单纯 SCI 组和 SCI+TBI 组在流行病学方面存在一些差异,但同时伴有轻度至中度 TBI 对 SCI 后 1 年的存活率、神经功能恢复和功能预后没有显著影响。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concomitant traumatic brain injury as a determinant of survival, and neurological and functional outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Although concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) is not infrequently associated with spinal cord injury (SCI), there is relatively scarce information about the effects of concomitant TBI on outcomes after SCI.

Objective: To assess the impact of concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI on survival, and neurological and functional outcomes within the first year after acute traumatic SCI.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Acute spine trauma centers in the United States.

Participants: This study includes all individuals who were enrolled into the Third National Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS-3). The study population was classified into SCI + TBI group and SCI-alone group. TBI was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score <15 on admission.

Intervention: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Both groups were compared regarding their survival and neurological outcomes (ie, NASCIS motor, sensory and pain scores) and functional outcome (ie, Functional Independence Measure score) within the first year following SCI. Data analyses were adjusted for major potential confounders.

Results: There were 413 individuals in the SCI-alone group and 86 individuals in the SCI + TBI group (17.2%). Both groups were comparable regarding gender distribution (p = .621). However, the SCI + TBI group was older (p < .001), had a higher proportion of complete (p = .006) and cervical SCI (p = .003), and had a higher blood alcohol level (p < .001) than the SCI-alone group. The SCI + TBI group did not significantly differ from the SCI-alone group regarding survival within the first year after SCI (p = .768). Among the survivors, concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI did not significantly affect neurological and functional outcomes at 1 year after SCI in the multiple regression analyses after adjusting for major potential confounders.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that concomitant mild-to-moderate TBI did not have a significant impact on survival, neurological recovery, and functional outcomes at 1 year after SCI, even though there were some epidemiological differences between SCI-alone and SCI + TBI groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信