现实主义、分歧和解释

IF 1.3 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Brian Leiter
{"title":"现实主义、分歧和解释","authors":"Brian Leiter","doi":"10.1111/phpr.13041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Morality and Mathematics</i> by Justin Clarke-Doane (<span>2020</span>; hereafter “JCD”) is a richly argued and deeply original contribution to meta-ethics. My focus will be primarily on the arguments in Chapters 2 and 3, purporting to show that moral beliefs and mathematical beliefs are actually on a par when it comes to both <i>a priori</i> and <i>a posteriori</i> justification (what I will call the “Symmetry Thesis”).1 I start by saying something briefly about JCD's understanding of “realism” in Chapter 1, since it bears on some of the arguments in the chapters that follow.2</p>","PeriodicalId":48136,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realism, disagreement, and explanation\",\"authors\":\"Brian Leiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phpr.13041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Morality and Mathematics</i> by Justin Clarke-Doane (<span>2020</span>; hereafter “JCD”) is a richly argued and deeply original contribution to meta-ethics. My focus will be primarily on the arguments in Chapters 2 and 3, purporting to show that moral beliefs and mathematical beliefs are actually on a par when it comes to both <i>a priori</i> and <i>a posteriori</i> justification (what I will call the “Symmetry Thesis”).1 I start by saying something briefly about JCD's understanding of “realism” in Chapter 1, since it bears on some of the arguments in the chapters that follow.2</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贾斯汀-克拉克-多恩(Justin Clarke-Doane,2020;以下简称 "JCD")的《道德与数学》(Morality and Mathematics)是对元伦理学的一个论证丰富、极具原创性的贡献。我将主要讨论第 2 章和第 3 章的论点,这两章旨在说明道德信念和数学信念在先验和后验理由方面实际上是平等的(我将称之为 "对称论")。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realism, disagreement, and explanation

Morality and Mathematics by Justin Clarke-Doane (2020; hereafter “JCD”) is a richly argued and deeply original contribution to meta-ethics. My focus will be primarily on the arguments in Chapters 2 and 3, purporting to show that moral beliefs and mathematical beliefs are actually on a par when it comes to both a priori and a posteriori justification (what I will call the “Symmetry Thesis”).1 I start by saying something briefly about JCD's understanding of “realism” in Chapter 1, since it bears on some of the arguments in the chapters that follow.2

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research publishes articles in a wide range of areas including philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, and philosophical history of philosophy. No specific methodology or philosophical orientation is required for submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信