{"title":"现实主义、分歧和解释","authors":"Brian Leiter","doi":"10.1111/phpr.13041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Morality and Mathematics</i> by Justin Clarke-Doane (<span>2020</span>; hereafter “JCD”) is a richly argued and deeply original contribution to meta-ethics. My focus will be primarily on the arguments in Chapters 2 and 3, purporting to show that moral beliefs and mathematical beliefs are actually on a par when it comes to both <i>a priori</i> and <i>a posteriori</i> justification (what I will call the “Symmetry Thesis”).1 I start by saying something briefly about JCD's understanding of “realism” in Chapter 1, since it bears on some of the arguments in the chapters that follow.2</p>","PeriodicalId":48136,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realism, disagreement, and explanation\",\"authors\":\"Brian Leiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phpr.13041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Morality and Mathematics</i> by Justin Clarke-Doane (<span>2020</span>; hereafter “JCD”) is a richly argued and deeply original contribution to meta-ethics. My focus will be primarily on the arguments in Chapters 2 and 3, purporting to show that moral beliefs and mathematical beliefs are actually on a par when it comes to both <i>a priori</i> and <i>a posteriori</i> justification (what I will call the “Symmetry Thesis”).1 I start by saying something briefly about JCD's understanding of “realism” in Chapter 1, since it bears on some of the arguments in the chapters that follow.2</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
贾斯汀-克拉克-多恩(Justin Clarke-Doane,2020;以下简称 "JCD")的《道德与数学》(Morality and Mathematics)是对元伦理学的一个论证丰富、极具原创性的贡献。我将主要讨论第 2 章和第 3 章的论点,这两章旨在说明道德信念和数学信念在先验和后验理由方面实际上是平等的(我将称之为 "对称论")。
Morality and Mathematics by Justin Clarke-Doane (2020; hereafter “JCD”) is a richly argued and deeply original contribution to meta-ethics. My focus will be primarily on the arguments in Chapters 2 and 3, purporting to show that moral beliefs and mathematical beliefs are actually on a par when it comes to both a priori and a posteriori justification (what I will call the “Symmetry Thesis”).1 I start by saying something briefly about JCD's understanding of “realism” in Chapter 1, since it bears on some of the arguments in the chapters that follow.2
期刊介绍:
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research publishes articles in a wide range of areas including philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, and philosophical history of philosophy. No specific methodology or philosophical orientation is required for submissions.