变化世界中的地下水建模:MODFLOW 及更多 2022 年特刊。

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Groundwater Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1111/gwat.13378
Mary C. Hill, Reed M. Maxwell, Matthew Tonkin
{"title":"变化世界中的地下水建模:MODFLOW 及更多 2022 年特刊。","authors":"Mary C. Hill,&nbsp;Reed M. Maxwell,&nbsp;Matthew Tonkin","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The “MODFLOW-and-More” (MF&amp;M) conference series arose from the vision of Chunmiao Zheng, Eileen Poeter, and Mary C. Hill. MF&amp;M convened at the Colorado School of Mines on nine occasions commencing in 1998. Past attendees recall friendly (sometimes heated!) debates, lunch with luminaries—like Gregory J. Hobbs, Colorado State Supreme Court Justice, and James Eklund, lead negotiator of the Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan—dinners at Table Mountain Inn, and late-night pool at the Ace.</p><p>Following the challenges posed by COVID, the 10th rendition of MF&amp;M convened in 2022 at Princeton University. The conference was a great success, sustaining the vibrance of nearly three decades by bringing private, public, and academic sector scientists together to share applications and bleeding-edge research and development of (mostly free and open-source) simulation codes and support software. While COVID challenges and the change in venue might have been anticipated to affect attendance, the 2022 crowd was right in line with previous meetings and attendees expressed genuine joy at rubbing shoulders again.</p><p>The “Changing World” theme of the 2022 conference could not have been more topical. Groundwater is now the subject of a series of articles in the New York Times. Such press coverage of groundwater has historically been occasional at best. What might our planet and its 8 billion population as of November 2022 be like without convenient access to local clean groundwater? We might discover the answer to this sooner and in more places in the world than we ever imagined.</p><p>This Special Issue emphasizes advances in computational methods and codes for evaluating groundwater data, availability, quality, at a range of scales; plus novel methods for communicating to decision makers and the broader community. To begin, Engdahl describes groundwater modeling using the innate capabilities of quantum computing. He notes that “…very little about how a QCP [quantum computing platform] … is the same as how our current BDCs [binary digital computers] work … Next generation GW models should not just mimic our current models but should instead address frustrations or deficiencies while building new capabilities, like better UQ for predictions.”</p><p>Next up, two groups of authors address certain challenges of model inputs. Brookfield et al. test four approaches to determining “Irrigation pumping – how much?”, while Ma et al. use artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods to explore “Water levels – how deep?” at the CONUS scale using Random Forest techniques. Two challenges posed by groundwater quality concerns are then presented. Ozbek et al. evaluate data gaps in the delineation of a PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic acid) plume using PlumeTrackerTM; while Khambhammettu et al. present geologic facies modeling of properties important to contaminant temporal persistence using Traveling Pilot Points (TRIPS) and an iterative ensemble smoother (IES) to solve the resulting categorical inverse problem. Two articles then address challenges posed when defining hydrostratigraphy for CONUS-scale simulations: Swilley compares and contrasts hydraulic conductivity fields produced using geologically and analytically based techniques, while Tijerina-Kreuzer evaluates 80 different CONUS-scale subsurface products to inform a national hydrostratigraphy configuration.</p><p>The increased demands of practicing modelers push existing software capabilities and drive development. MODFLOW 6 advances are presented by Langevin and Hughes, who demonstrate that the architecture supports existing capabilities and enables expansion via the flexible discretization and package integration options it offers.</p><p>A technical commentary and software highlight address aspects of model-data interaction. Traylor presents an efficient data integration method using “localization” of observation importance to parameters, while McLane uses inverse modeling and analytic elements to identify potentially important new observations.</p><p>Attendees at the 2022 MF&amp;M conference reaped the benefits of witnessing these presentations in person and engaging with the authors in the wonderful surroundings of Princeton. We hope to see readers at the next conference scheduled for June of 2024 at the Princeton campus!</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"62 1","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13378","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groundwater Modeling in a Changing World: MODFLOW-and-More 2022 Special Issue\",\"authors\":\"Mary C. Hill,&nbsp;Reed M. Maxwell,&nbsp;Matthew Tonkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwat.13378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The “MODFLOW-and-More” (MF&amp;M) conference series arose from the vision of Chunmiao Zheng, Eileen Poeter, and Mary C. Hill. MF&amp;M convened at the Colorado School of Mines on nine occasions commencing in 1998. Past attendees recall friendly (sometimes heated!) debates, lunch with luminaries—like Gregory J. Hobbs, Colorado State Supreme Court Justice, and James Eklund, lead negotiator of the Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan—dinners at Table Mountain Inn, and late-night pool at the Ace.</p><p>Following the challenges posed by COVID, the 10th rendition of MF&amp;M convened in 2022 at Princeton University. The conference was a great success, sustaining the vibrance of nearly three decades by bringing private, public, and academic sector scientists together to share applications and bleeding-edge research and development of (mostly free and open-source) simulation codes and support software. While COVID challenges and the change in venue might have been anticipated to affect attendance, the 2022 crowd was right in line with previous meetings and attendees expressed genuine joy at rubbing shoulders again.</p><p>The “Changing World” theme of the 2022 conference could not have been more topical. Groundwater is now the subject of a series of articles in the New York Times. Such press coverage of groundwater has historically been occasional at best. What might our planet and its 8 billion population as of November 2022 be like without convenient access to local clean groundwater? We might discover the answer to this sooner and in more places in the world than we ever imagined.</p><p>This Special Issue emphasizes advances in computational methods and codes for evaluating groundwater data, availability, quality, at a range of scales; plus novel methods for communicating to decision makers and the broader community. To begin, Engdahl describes groundwater modeling using the innate capabilities of quantum computing. He notes that “…very little about how a QCP [quantum computing platform] … is the same as how our current BDCs [binary digital computers] work … Next generation GW models should not just mimic our current models but should instead address frustrations or deficiencies while building new capabilities, like better UQ for predictions.”</p><p>Next up, two groups of authors address certain challenges of model inputs. Brookfield et al. test four approaches to determining “Irrigation pumping – how much?”, while Ma et al. use artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods to explore “Water levels – how deep?” at the CONUS scale using Random Forest techniques. Two challenges posed by groundwater quality concerns are then presented. Ozbek et al. evaluate data gaps in the delineation of a PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic acid) plume using PlumeTrackerTM; while Khambhammettu et al. present geologic facies modeling of properties important to contaminant temporal persistence using Traveling Pilot Points (TRIPS) and an iterative ensemble smoother (IES) to solve the resulting categorical inverse problem. Two articles then address challenges posed when defining hydrostratigraphy for CONUS-scale simulations: Swilley compares and contrasts hydraulic conductivity fields produced using geologically and analytically based techniques, while Tijerina-Kreuzer evaluates 80 different CONUS-scale subsurface products to inform a national hydrostratigraphy configuration.</p><p>The increased demands of practicing modelers push existing software capabilities and drive development. MODFLOW 6 advances are presented by Langevin and Hughes, who demonstrate that the architecture supports existing capabilities and enables expansion via the flexible discretization and package integration options it offers.</p><p>A technical commentary and software highlight address aspects of model-data interaction. Traylor presents an efficient data integration method using “localization” of observation importance to parameters, while McLane uses inverse modeling and analytic elements to identify potentially important new observations.</p><p>Attendees at the 2022 MF&amp;M conference reaped the benefits of witnessing these presentations in person and engaging with the authors in the wonderful surroundings of Princeton. We hope to see readers at the next conference scheduled for June of 2024 at the Princeton campus!</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"4-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13378\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13378\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

MODFLOW-and-More"(MF&M)系列会议由郑春苗、艾琳-波特和玛丽-希尔共同发起。从 1998 年开始,MF&M 在科罗拉多矿业学院召开了九次会议。过去的与会者回忆起友好的辩论(有时是激烈的辩论!)、与名人共进午餐(如科罗拉多州最高法院法官格雷戈里-霍布斯(Gregory J. Hobbs)和科罗拉多河抗旱应急计划首席谈判代表詹姆斯-埃克伦德(James Eklund))、在桌山旅馆共进晚餐以及深夜在 Ace 打台球。这次会议取得了巨大成功,保持了近三十年来的活力,将私营、公共和学术部门的科学家聚集在一起,分享模拟代码和支持软件(大多为免费和开源)的应用和前沿研发。虽然 COVID 面临的挑战和会议地点的改变可能会影响参会人数,但 2022 年的参会人数与往届会议持平,参会者对再次共聚一堂表示由衷的高兴。2022 年会议的主题 "变化中的世界 "再合适不过了。从历史上看,此类关于地下水的新闻报道充其量只是偶尔为之。如果不能方便地获取当地的清洁地下水,到 2022 年 11 月,我们的地球及其 80 亿人口会变成什么样?本特刊强调了在各种规模上评估地下水数据、可用性和质量的计算方法和代码方面的进展,以及向决策者和更广泛的社区进行宣传的新方法。首先,恩格达尔介绍了利用量子计算的先天能力进行地下水建模的情况。他指出:"......QCP(量子计算平台)......与我们目前的 BDC(二进制数字计算机)的工作方式几乎没有什么相同之处......下一代地下水模型不应只是模仿我们目前的模型,而应在建立新能力(如更好的预测 UQ)的同时解决挫折或缺陷。"接下来,两组作者探讨了模型输入的某些挑战。Brookfield 等人测试了四种确定 "灌溉抽水量--多少?"的方法,而 Ma 等人则使用人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)方法,利用随机森林(Random Forest)技术在 CONUS 范围内探索 "水位--多深?随后介绍了地下水质量问题带来的两个挑战。Ozbek 等人利用 PlumeTrackerTM 评估了全氟辛酸(PFOA)羽流划定过程中的数据缺口;而 Khambhammettu 等人则利用 Traveling Pilot Points (TRIPS) 和迭代集合平滑器 (IES) 对污染物时间持久性的重要属性进行了地质面建模,以解决由此产生的分类逆问题。随后,两篇文章探讨了在为 CONUS 尺度模拟定义水文地层时所面临的挑战:Swilley 对使用地质技术和分析技术生成的水力传导场进行了比较和对比,而 Tijerina-Kreuzer 则对 80 种不同的 CONUS 尺度地下产品进行了评估,以便为国家水文地层配置提供信息。Langevin 和 Hughes 介绍了 MODFLOW 6 的进展,证明该架构支持现有功能,并可通过灵活的离散化和软件包集成选项进行扩展。Traylor 介绍了一种高效的数据整合方法,该方法使用了观测数据对参数重要性的 "定位",而 McLane 则使用了反演建模和分析元素来识别潜在的重要新观测数据。我们希望能在定于 2024 年 6 月在普林斯顿校园举行的下一届会议上见到读者!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Groundwater Modeling in a Changing World: MODFLOW-and-More 2022 Special Issue

The “MODFLOW-and-More” (MF&M) conference series arose from the vision of Chunmiao Zheng, Eileen Poeter, and Mary C. Hill. MF&M convened at the Colorado School of Mines on nine occasions commencing in 1998. Past attendees recall friendly (sometimes heated!) debates, lunch with luminaries—like Gregory J. Hobbs, Colorado State Supreme Court Justice, and James Eklund, lead negotiator of the Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan—dinners at Table Mountain Inn, and late-night pool at the Ace.

Following the challenges posed by COVID, the 10th rendition of MF&M convened in 2022 at Princeton University. The conference was a great success, sustaining the vibrance of nearly three decades by bringing private, public, and academic sector scientists together to share applications and bleeding-edge research and development of (mostly free and open-source) simulation codes and support software. While COVID challenges and the change in venue might have been anticipated to affect attendance, the 2022 crowd was right in line with previous meetings and attendees expressed genuine joy at rubbing shoulders again.

The “Changing World” theme of the 2022 conference could not have been more topical. Groundwater is now the subject of a series of articles in the New York Times. Such press coverage of groundwater has historically been occasional at best. What might our planet and its 8 billion population as of November 2022 be like without convenient access to local clean groundwater? We might discover the answer to this sooner and in more places in the world than we ever imagined.

This Special Issue emphasizes advances in computational methods and codes for evaluating groundwater data, availability, quality, at a range of scales; plus novel methods for communicating to decision makers and the broader community. To begin, Engdahl describes groundwater modeling using the innate capabilities of quantum computing. He notes that “…very little about how a QCP [quantum computing platform] … is the same as how our current BDCs [binary digital computers] work … Next generation GW models should not just mimic our current models but should instead address frustrations or deficiencies while building new capabilities, like better UQ for predictions.”

Next up, two groups of authors address certain challenges of model inputs. Brookfield et al. test four approaches to determining “Irrigation pumping – how much?”, while Ma et al. use artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods to explore “Water levels – how deep?” at the CONUS scale using Random Forest techniques. Two challenges posed by groundwater quality concerns are then presented. Ozbek et al. evaluate data gaps in the delineation of a PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic acid) plume using PlumeTrackerTM; while Khambhammettu et al. present geologic facies modeling of properties important to contaminant temporal persistence using Traveling Pilot Points (TRIPS) and an iterative ensemble smoother (IES) to solve the resulting categorical inverse problem. Two articles then address challenges posed when defining hydrostratigraphy for CONUS-scale simulations: Swilley compares and contrasts hydraulic conductivity fields produced using geologically and analytically based techniques, while Tijerina-Kreuzer evaluates 80 different CONUS-scale subsurface products to inform a national hydrostratigraphy configuration.

The increased demands of practicing modelers push existing software capabilities and drive development. MODFLOW 6 advances are presented by Langevin and Hughes, who demonstrate that the architecture supports existing capabilities and enables expansion via the flexible discretization and package integration options it offers.

A technical commentary and software highlight address aspects of model-data interaction. Traylor presents an efficient data integration method using “localization” of observation importance to parameters, while McLane uses inverse modeling and analytic elements to identify potentially important new observations.

Attendees at the 2022 MF&M conference reaped the benefits of witnessing these presentations in person and engaging with the authors in the wonderful surroundings of Princeton. We hope to see readers at the next conference scheduled for June of 2024 at the Princeton campus!

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信