唾液可的松作为职业暴露于噪声和相关压力的潜在预测因子。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Roko Žaja, Sanja Stipičević, Milan Milošević, Andro Košec, Jakov Ajduk, Iva Kelava, Adrijana Zglavnik Baća, Marko Klarica, Mihael Ries
{"title":"唾液可的松作为职业暴露于噪声和相关压力的潜在预测因子。","authors":"Roko Žaja, Sanja Stipičević, Milan Milošević, Andro Košec, Jakov Ajduk, Iva Kelava, Adrijana Zglavnik Baća, Marko Klarica, Mihael Ries","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Salivary cortisone strongly correlates with serum cortisol, and since it is less invasive to measure salivary cortisone than serum cortisol and easier than to measure cortisol in saliva, as its concentrations are much lower, we wanted to compare salivary cortisone and cortisol levels as markers of noise-induced stress reaction. The study included 104 participants aged 19-30 years, 50 of whom were exposed to occupational noise ≥85 dB(A) and 54 non-exposed, control students. All participants took samples of their saliva with Salivette<sup>®</sup> Cortisol synthetic swabs on three consecutive working days first thing in the morning. Salivary cortisone and cortisol levels were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, they completed a 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) questionnaire, and occupationally noise-exposed participants also completed the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) questionnaire on occupational psychosocial risks. The exposed participants had significantly higher cortisone (P<0.001) and cortisol (P<0.001) levels than controls, and the correlation between cortisone and cortisol levels in the exposed participants was strong (ϱ =0.692, P<0.001), which suggests that salivary cortisone can replace cortisol measurements in saliva as a more reliable method than salivary cortisol and less invasive than serum cortisol. However, the level of perceived stress scored on PSS-10 in the exposed participants did not differ significantly from stress reported by controls, but correlated negatively with cortisone levels, which is contrary to our expectations and raises questions as to why.</p>","PeriodicalId":55462,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"74 4","pages":"232-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary cortisone as potential predictor of occupational exposure to noise and related stress.\",\"authors\":\"Roko Žaja, Sanja Stipičević, Milan Milošević, Andro Košec, Jakov Ajduk, Iva Kelava, Adrijana Zglavnik Baća, Marko Klarica, Mihael Ries\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Salivary cortisone strongly correlates with serum cortisol, and since it is less invasive to measure salivary cortisone than serum cortisol and easier than to measure cortisol in saliva, as its concentrations are much lower, we wanted to compare salivary cortisone and cortisol levels as markers of noise-induced stress reaction. The study included 104 participants aged 19-30 years, 50 of whom were exposed to occupational noise ≥85 dB(A) and 54 non-exposed, control students. All participants took samples of their saliva with Salivette<sup>®</sup> Cortisol synthetic swabs on three consecutive working days first thing in the morning. Salivary cortisone and cortisol levels were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, they completed a 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) questionnaire, and occupationally noise-exposed participants also completed the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) questionnaire on occupational psychosocial risks. The exposed participants had significantly higher cortisone (P<0.001) and cortisol (P<0.001) levels than controls, and the correlation between cortisone and cortisol levels in the exposed participants was strong (ϱ =0.692, P<0.001), which suggests that salivary cortisone can replace cortisol measurements in saliva as a more reliable method than salivary cortisol and less invasive than serum cortisol. However, the level of perceived stress scored on PSS-10 in the exposed participants did not differ significantly from stress reported by controls, but correlated negatively with cortisone levels, which is contrary to our expectations and raises questions as to why.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"232-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

唾液中的可的松与血清中的皮质醇密切相关,由于测量唾液中的可的松比血清中的皮质醇侵入性更小,而且比测量唾液中的皮质醇更容易,因为其浓度要低得多,因此我们希望将唾液中的可的松和皮质醇水平作为噪声诱导应激反应的标志物进行比较。这项研究包括 104 名年龄在 19-30 岁的参与者,其中 50 人暴露于≥85 dB(A)的职业噪声,54 人是未暴露于噪声的对照组学生。所有参与者都在连续三个工作日的清晨用 Salivette® 皮质醇合成棉签采集了唾液样本。采用高效液相色谱法测定唾液中的可的松和皮质醇水平。此外,他们还填写了一份包含 10 个项目的感知压力量表 (PSS-10) 问卷,受职业噪音影响的参与者还填写了健康与安全执行局 (HSE) 的职业社会心理风险问卷。暴露于噪声的参与者的可的松含量明显更高(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salivary cortisone as potential predictor of occupational exposure to noise and related stress.

Salivary cortisone strongly correlates with serum cortisol, and since it is less invasive to measure salivary cortisone than serum cortisol and easier than to measure cortisol in saliva, as its concentrations are much lower, we wanted to compare salivary cortisone and cortisol levels as markers of noise-induced stress reaction. The study included 104 participants aged 19-30 years, 50 of whom were exposed to occupational noise ≥85 dB(A) and 54 non-exposed, control students. All participants took samples of their saliva with Salivette® Cortisol synthetic swabs on three consecutive working days first thing in the morning. Salivary cortisone and cortisol levels were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, they completed a 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) questionnaire, and occupationally noise-exposed participants also completed the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) questionnaire on occupational psychosocial risks. The exposed participants had significantly higher cortisone (P<0.001) and cortisol (P<0.001) levels than controls, and the correlation between cortisone and cortisol levels in the exposed participants was strong (ϱ =0.692, P<0.001), which suggests that salivary cortisone can replace cortisol measurements in saliva as a more reliable method than salivary cortisol and less invasive than serum cortisol. However, the level of perceived stress scored on PSS-10 in the exposed participants did not differ significantly from stress reported by controls, but correlated negatively with cortisone levels, which is contrary to our expectations and raises questions as to why.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (abbr. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol) is a peer-reviewed biomedical scientific quarterly that publishes contributions relevant to all aspects of environmental and occupational health and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信