"主体性、学术工作和母爱实践":驾驭晦涩难懂的学科

Michelle O’Shea, Sarah Duffy, Emilee Gilbert
{"title":"\"主体性、学术工作和母爱实践\":驾驭晦涩难懂的学科","authors":"Michelle O’Shea, Sarah Duffy, Emilee Gilbert","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A robust and important body of scholarship is exploring the multiple and layered complexities of mothering and paid work. In this paper, we theoretically and empirically contribute to this work by exploring how, at the level of the self, women with children understand themselves in relation to their paid work and their mothering. We have examined this focus using a post-structural feminist lens inspired by Foucauldian ideas related to the subject and technologies of the self. This perspective has focused our attention on the informal practices in an Australian university workplace, where we locate and problematize tensions between industrial and policy provisions designed to support mothers and mother's everyday workplace experiences. Our findings arise from focus groups, in-depth interviews, and our personal narrative accounts and elucidate how despite well-established policy supports, formal and informal workplace practices shape and discipline how mothers come to understand themselves and their paid work in the academy. We find that policy provisions for families in the workplace operate to conceal and legitimate gendered workplace practices, contributing to subjectivities formed through doubt, fear, shame, anxiety, isolation, and guilt. More productively, subjectivities were also born through agency, resistance, and revision, albeit wrapped by additional labor, personal, and professional costs.","PeriodicalId":501466,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Work & Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Subjectivities, academic work and mothering practice”: Navigating obscure and unspoken disciplines\",\"authors\":\"Michelle O’Shea, Sarah Duffy, Emilee Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwao.13105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A robust and important body of scholarship is exploring the multiple and layered complexities of mothering and paid work. In this paper, we theoretically and empirically contribute to this work by exploring how, at the level of the self, women with children understand themselves in relation to their paid work and their mothering. We have examined this focus using a post-structural feminist lens inspired by Foucauldian ideas related to the subject and technologies of the self. This perspective has focused our attention on the informal practices in an Australian university workplace, where we locate and problematize tensions between industrial and policy provisions designed to support mothers and mother's everyday workplace experiences. Our findings arise from focus groups, in-depth interviews, and our personal narrative accounts and elucidate how despite well-established policy supports, formal and informal workplace practices shape and discipline how mothers come to understand themselves and their paid work in the academy. We find that policy provisions for families in the workplace operate to conceal and legitimate gendered workplace practices, contributing to subjectivities formed through doubt, fear, shame, anxiety, isolation, and guilt. More productively, subjectivities were also born through agency, resistance, and revision, albeit wrapped by additional labor, personal, and professional costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender, Work & Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender, Work & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Work & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量重要的学术研究正在探索母亲身份和有偿工作的多重复杂性。在本文中,我们从理论和实证角度探讨了有子女的妇女如何从自我层面理解自己与有偿工作和母亲身份的关系,从而为这项工作做出贡献。我们从福柯尔德有关主体和自我技术的思想中受到启发,使用后结构女权主义视角对这一焦点进行了研究。这一视角将我们的注意力集中在澳大利亚一所大学工作场所的非正式实践上,我们在这里找到了旨在支持母亲的行业和政策规定与母亲的日常工作场所经历之间的紧张关系,并将其问题化。我们的研究结果来自焦点小组、深度访谈和我们的个人叙述,并阐明了尽管有完善的政策支持,正式和非正式的工作场所实践是如何塑造和约束母亲们如何理解自己以及她们在学术界的有偿工作的。我们发现,针对工作场所家庭的政策规定掩盖了工作场所的性别化做法,并使之合法化,这导致了通过怀疑、恐惧、羞愧、焦虑、孤立和内疚形成的主体性。更有成效的是,主体性也是通过代理、抵抗和修正而产生的,尽管还需要付出额外的劳动、个人和职业代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Subjectivities, academic work and mothering practice”: Navigating obscure and unspoken disciplines
A robust and important body of scholarship is exploring the multiple and layered complexities of mothering and paid work. In this paper, we theoretically and empirically contribute to this work by exploring how, at the level of the self, women with children understand themselves in relation to their paid work and their mothering. We have examined this focus using a post-structural feminist lens inspired by Foucauldian ideas related to the subject and technologies of the self. This perspective has focused our attention on the informal practices in an Australian university workplace, where we locate and problematize tensions between industrial and policy provisions designed to support mothers and mother's everyday workplace experiences. Our findings arise from focus groups, in-depth interviews, and our personal narrative accounts and elucidate how despite well-established policy supports, formal and informal workplace practices shape and discipline how mothers come to understand themselves and their paid work in the academy. We find that policy provisions for families in the workplace operate to conceal and legitimate gendered workplace practices, contributing to subjectivities formed through doubt, fear, shame, anxiety, isolation, and guilt. More productively, subjectivities were also born through agency, resistance, and revision, albeit wrapped by additional labor, personal, and professional costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信