Nico Mans, Henning M. Krieg, Derik J. van der Westhuizen
{"title":"电解质成分对单节铁铬液流电池性能的影响","authors":"Nico Mans, Henning M. Krieg, Derik J. van der Westhuizen","doi":"10.1002/aesr.202300238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flow batteries are promising for large-scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low-cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all-vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of electrolyte composition (active species and supporting electrolyte concentrations), Fe/Cr molar ratio, and supporting electrolyte type (HCl and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) on the performance (current efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), energy efficiency, discharge capacity, and capacity decay) of an ICRFB is investigated. The storage capacity of the optimum electrolyte (1.3 <span>m</span> FeCl<sub>2</sub>, 1.4 <span>m</span> CrCl<sub>3</sub>, 5.0 m<span>m</span> Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in 1.0 <span>m</span> HCl) is 40% higher (from 17.5 to 24.4 Ah L<sup>−1</sup>), while the capacity decay rate is tenfold lower (from 3.0 to 0.3% h<sup>−1</sup>) than the performance of the previously used 1.0 <span>m</span> FeCl<sub>2</sub>, 1.0 <span>m</span> CrCl<sub>3</sub> in 3.0 <span>m</span> HCl. At the optimum Fe and Cr concentrations and ratio in 0.5 <span>m</span> HCl, a near constant CE (92.3%), VE (78.7%), and EE (72.6%) are obtained over 50 cycles. The significantly higher capacity decay when using 1.0 <span>m</span> H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (1.6% h<sup>−1</sup>) compared to 1.0 <span>m</span> HCl (0.3% h<sup>−1</sup>) confirms that HCl is the more suitable supporting electrolyte.</p>","PeriodicalId":29794,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aesr.202300238","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single-Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery\",\"authors\":\"Nico Mans, Henning M. Krieg, Derik J. van der Westhuizen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aesr.202300238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flow batteries are promising for large-scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low-cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all-vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of electrolyte composition (active species and supporting electrolyte concentrations), Fe/Cr molar ratio, and supporting electrolyte type (HCl and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) on the performance (current efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), energy efficiency, discharge capacity, and capacity decay) of an ICRFB is investigated. The storage capacity of the optimum electrolyte (1.3 <span>m</span> FeCl<sub>2</sub>, 1.4 <span>m</span> CrCl<sub>3</sub>, 5.0 m<span>m</span> Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in 1.0 <span>m</span> HCl) is 40% higher (from 17.5 to 24.4 Ah L<sup>−1</sup>), while the capacity decay rate is tenfold lower (from 3.0 to 0.3% h<sup>−1</sup>) than the performance of the previously used 1.0 <span>m</span> FeCl<sub>2</sub>, 1.0 <span>m</span> CrCl<sub>3</sub> in 3.0 <span>m</span> HCl. At the optimum Fe and Cr concentrations and ratio in 0.5 <span>m</span> HCl, a near constant CE (92.3%), VE (78.7%), and EE (72.6%) are obtained over 50 cycles. The significantly higher capacity decay when using 1.0 <span>m</span> H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (1.6% h<sup>−1</sup>) compared to 1.0 <span>m</span> HCl (0.3% h<sup>−1</sup>) confirms that HCl is the more suitable supporting electrolyte.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aesr.202300238\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aesr.202300238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aesr.202300238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在间歇性可再生能源技术中,液流电池在大规模储能方面大有可为。虽然铁铬氧化还原液流电池(ICRFB)是一种低成本液流电池,但与全钒液流电池相比,它的存储容量较低,容量衰减率较高。本文研究了电解质成分(活性物种和支持电解质浓度)、铁/铬摩尔比和支持电解质类型(HCl 和 H2SO4)对 ICRFB 性能(电流效率(CE)、电压效率(VE)、能量效率、放电容量和容量衰减)的影响。最佳电解质(1.0 m HCl 中的 1.3 m FeCl2、1.4 m CrCl3、5.0 mm Bi2O3)的存储容量比之前使用的 3.0 m HCl 中的 1.0 m FeCl2、1.0 m CrCl3 高 40%(从 17.5 到 24.4 Ah L-1),而容量衰减率则比之前使用的 1.0 m FeCl2、1.0 m CrCl3 低 10 倍(从 3.0 到 0.3% h-1)。在 0.5 m HCl 中达到最佳的铁和铬浓度和比例时,50 个周期内可获得接近恒定的 CE(92.3%)、VE(78.7%)和 EE(72.6%)。与 1.0 m HCl(0.3% h-1)相比,使用 1.0 m H2SO4 时的容量衰减(1.6% h-1)明显更高,这证明 HCl 是更合适的支撑电解质。
The Effect of Electrolyte Composition on the Performance of a Single-Cell Iron–Chromium Flow Battery
Flow batteries are promising for large-scale energy storage in intermittent renewable energy technologies. While the iron–chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) is a low-cost flow battery, it has a lower storage capacity and a higher capacity decay rate than the all-vanadium RFB. Herein, the effect of electrolyte composition (active species and supporting electrolyte concentrations), Fe/Cr molar ratio, and supporting electrolyte type (HCl and H2SO4) on the performance (current efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), energy efficiency, discharge capacity, and capacity decay) of an ICRFB is investigated. The storage capacity of the optimum electrolyte (1.3 m FeCl2, 1.4 m CrCl3, 5.0 mm Bi2O3 in 1.0 m HCl) is 40% higher (from 17.5 to 24.4 Ah L−1), while the capacity decay rate is tenfold lower (from 3.0 to 0.3% h−1) than the performance of the previously used 1.0 m FeCl2, 1.0 m CrCl3 in 3.0 m HCl. At the optimum Fe and Cr concentrations and ratio in 0.5 m HCl, a near constant CE (92.3%), VE (78.7%), and EE (72.6%) are obtained over 50 cycles. The significantly higher capacity decay when using 1.0 m H2SO4 (1.6% h−1) compared to 1.0 m HCl (0.3% h−1) confirms that HCl is the more suitable supporting electrolyte.
期刊介绍:
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research is an open access academic journal that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed research articles in the areas of energy harvesting, conversion, storage, distribution, applications, ecology, climate change, water and environmental sciences, and related societal impacts. The journal provides readers with free access to influential scientific research that has undergone rigorous peer review, a common feature of all journals in the Advanced series. In addition to original research articles, the journal publishes opinion, editorial and review articles designed to meet the needs of a broad readership interested in energy and sustainability science and related fields.
In addition, Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research is indexed in several abstracting and indexing services, including:
CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
Emerging Sources Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics)
INSPEC (IET)
Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics).