在不断变化的气候中估算趋势和当前气候平均值

IF 4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Simon C. Scherrer , Cees de Valk , Michael Begert , Stefanie Gubler , Sven Kotlarski , Mischa Croci-Maspoli
{"title":"在不断变化的气候中估算趋势和当前气候平均值","authors":"Simon C. Scherrer ,&nbsp;Cees de Valk ,&nbsp;Michael Begert ,&nbsp;Stefanie Gubler ,&nbsp;Sven Kotlarski ,&nbsp;Mischa Croci-Maspoli","doi":"10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Describing the climate evolution using trend lines and estimating the current climate mean (CCM) on the local scale is an important climate service. For an increasing number of variables, accelerating climate change disqualifies the use of traditional climatological normals and long-term linear trends as CCM estimators. Although several alternatives are available and already in use, there are few comprehensive assessments of the different approaches let alone a consensus for recommending a particular method. Here we evaluate frequently used approaches that use past climate data to estimate the CCM applying several transparent criteria. The performance is assessed in a perfect model framework for the strongly changing Swiss mean temperature 1864–2099 with the centered 30-year mean as CCM benchmark. Short-term linear trends, cubic splines and local linear regression with optimized parameters all provide unbiased CCM estimates for a broad range of climate evolutions and independent of trend magnitudes. To enable broad usability, additional criteria are considered such as a wide applicability to a large number of climate variables and simplicity in terms of use, settings and communication. In the overall assessment, local linear regression emerges as a particularly promising method to describe nonlinear climate trends and to determine the CCM. The criteria-based assessment approach has proven very useful in choosing a method as objectively as possible. We present ideas for modern climate services to complement the toolbox of climate monitoring and encourage the community to develop recommendations at the international level to increase the coherence, objectivity and robustness of climate monitoring products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51332,"journal":{"name":"Climate Services","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100428"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880723000900/pdfft?md5=548cfc1f75db8fd3dd13d0a47eb3b9c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2405880723000900-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating trends and the current climate mean in a changing climate\",\"authors\":\"Simon C. Scherrer ,&nbsp;Cees de Valk ,&nbsp;Michael Begert ,&nbsp;Stefanie Gubler ,&nbsp;Sven Kotlarski ,&nbsp;Mischa Croci-Maspoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Describing the climate evolution using trend lines and estimating the current climate mean (CCM) on the local scale is an important climate service. For an increasing number of variables, accelerating climate change disqualifies the use of traditional climatological normals and long-term linear trends as CCM estimators. Although several alternatives are available and already in use, there are few comprehensive assessments of the different approaches let alone a consensus for recommending a particular method. Here we evaluate frequently used approaches that use past climate data to estimate the CCM applying several transparent criteria. The performance is assessed in a perfect model framework for the strongly changing Swiss mean temperature 1864–2099 with the centered 30-year mean as CCM benchmark. Short-term linear trends, cubic splines and local linear regression with optimized parameters all provide unbiased CCM estimates for a broad range of climate evolutions and independent of trend magnitudes. To enable broad usability, additional criteria are considered such as a wide applicability to a large number of climate variables and simplicity in terms of use, settings and communication. In the overall assessment, local linear regression emerges as a particularly promising method to describe nonlinear climate trends and to determine the CCM. The criteria-based assessment approach has proven very useful in choosing a method as objectively as possible. We present ideas for modern climate services to complement the toolbox of climate monitoring and encourage the community to develop recommendations at the international level to increase the coherence, objectivity and robustness of climate monitoring products.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Services\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880723000900/pdfft?md5=548cfc1f75db8fd3dd13d0a47eb3b9c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2405880723000900-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880723000900\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880723000900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用趋势线描述气候演变和估算局部尺度的当前气候平均值(CCM)是一项重要的气候服务。对于越来越多的变量来说,气候变化的加速使传统的气候学常模和长期线性趋势无法用作 CCM 估算值。虽然有几种替代方法可供选择并已投入使用,但很少有对不同方法的全面评估,更不用说就推荐某种特定方法达成共识了。在此,我们采用几种透明标准,对常用的使用过去气候数据估算 CCM 的方法进行评估。在一个完美模型框架内,以变化剧烈的 1864-2099 年瑞士平均气温为基准,以 30 年平均气温为中心,对 CCM 的性能进行了评估。短期线性趋势、三次样条曲线和带有优化参数的局部线性回归都能为广泛的气候演变提供无偏的 CCM 估计值,且与趋势幅度无关。为了实现广泛的可用性,还考虑了其他标准,例如对大量气候变量的广泛适用性以及在使用、设置和交流方面的简便性。在总体评估中,局部线性回归是描述非线性气候趋势和确定 CCM 的一种特别有前途的方法。事实证明,基于标准的评估方法非常有助于尽可能客观地选择方法。我们提出了现代气候服务的想法,以补充气候监测工具箱,并鼓励社会各界在国际层面提出建议,以提高气候监测产品的一致性、客观性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimating trends and the current climate mean in a changing climate

Estimating trends and the current climate mean in a changing climate

Describing the climate evolution using trend lines and estimating the current climate mean (CCM) on the local scale is an important climate service. For an increasing number of variables, accelerating climate change disqualifies the use of traditional climatological normals and long-term linear trends as CCM estimators. Although several alternatives are available and already in use, there are few comprehensive assessments of the different approaches let alone a consensus for recommending a particular method. Here we evaluate frequently used approaches that use past climate data to estimate the CCM applying several transparent criteria. The performance is assessed in a perfect model framework for the strongly changing Swiss mean temperature 1864–2099 with the centered 30-year mean as CCM benchmark. Short-term linear trends, cubic splines and local linear regression with optimized parameters all provide unbiased CCM estimates for a broad range of climate evolutions and independent of trend magnitudes. To enable broad usability, additional criteria are considered such as a wide applicability to a large number of climate variables and simplicity in terms of use, settings and communication. In the overall assessment, local linear regression emerges as a particularly promising method to describe nonlinear climate trends and to determine the CCM. The criteria-based assessment approach has proven very useful in choosing a method as objectively as possible. We present ideas for modern climate services to complement the toolbox of climate monitoring and encourage the community to develop recommendations at the international level to increase the coherence, objectivity and robustness of climate monitoring products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Services
Climate Services Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The journal Climate Services publishes research with a focus on science-based and user-specific climate information underpinning climate services, ultimately to assist society to adapt to climate change. Climate Services brings science and practice closer together. The journal addresses both researchers in the field of climate service research, and stakeholders and practitioners interested in or already applying climate services. It serves as a means of communication, dialogue and exchange between researchers and stakeholders. Climate services pioneers novel research areas that directly refer to how climate information can be applied in methodologies and tools for adaptation to climate change. It publishes best practice examples, case studies as well as theories, methods and data analysis with a clear connection to climate services. The focus of the published work is often multi-disciplinary, case-specific, tailored to specific sectors and strongly application-oriented. To offer a suitable outlet for such studies, Climate Services journal introduced a new section in the research article type. The research article contains a classical scientific part as well as a section with easily understandable practical implications for policy makers and practitioners. The journal''s focus is on the use and usability of climate information for adaptation purposes underpinning climate services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信