弱视治疗结果再审计,将当前结果与 2011-12 年度审计结果进行比较。

Q3 Medicine
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.306
Michelle Blyth, Sarah Bryant
{"title":"弱视治疗结果再审计,将当前结果与 2011-12 年度审计结果进行比较。","authors":"Michelle Blyth, Sarah Bryant","doi":"10.22599/bioj.306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>An audit of the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment in the Newcastle Eye Centre (NEC) to determine how current visual acuity (VA) outcomes compare to those found in the 2011-12 audit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective database review. VA outcomes of patients who had undergone treatment for anisometropic, strabismic and mixed amblyopia; discharged between 31.08.2016 - 01.09.19, were compared with VA outcomes found in the previous audit. The previous audit reviewed patients commencing amblyopia treatment during 1.1.11-31.12.12.An unpaired T-test was used to assess if results were statistically significantly different to those found previously. Proportion of visual change from commencement to completion of treatment was calculated. The duration of episode from first visit to discharge, adverse events and percentage of patients who achieved acceptable visual outcomes following only six to eight weeks of occlusion, were also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 31.8.16 and 01.09.19, 1,100 patients were discharged, of which 174 had completed amblyopia treatment and fit the inclusion criteria for the audit. Results show no statistically significant difference between current and previous VA outcomes for each type of amblyopia. The majority of patients (60%) achieve a VA outcome of ≤0.250 (logMAR) in the amblyopic eye. This is comparable to the previous audit where 59% of patients achieved a VA outcome of ≤0.250. Most patients still achieve a level of VA which is equal or almost equal to the fellow eye following amblyopia treatment. Treatment is still completed within a two-year period for the majority of patients (62%). There was only one adverse event and this related to atropine occlusion. Only 18 out of the 174 (10%) patients showed that occlusion could be discontinued following just six to eight weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of amblyopia in the NEC is as successful as found in the previous audit and the current amblyopia treatment protocol remains effective. Only 10% of patients achieved the appropriate VA for amblyopia treatment to be ceased on their first return visit. This indicates that the follow-up length for patients undergoing amblyopia treatment could be extended beyond six to eight weeks without causing a detriment to VA outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"127-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10742088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amblyopia Treatment Outcomes Re-Audit, Comparing Current Outcomes to Those from the 2011-12 Audit.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Blyth, Sarah Bryant\",\"doi\":\"10.22599/bioj.306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>An audit of the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment in the Newcastle Eye Centre (NEC) to determine how current visual acuity (VA) outcomes compare to those found in the 2011-12 audit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective database review. VA outcomes of patients who had undergone treatment for anisometropic, strabismic and mixed amblyopia; discharged between 31.08.2016 - 01.09.19, were compared with VA outcomes found in the previous audit. The previous audit reviewed patients commencing amblyopia treatment during 1.1.11-31.12.12.An unpaired T-test was used to assess if results were statistically significantly different to those found previously. Proportion of visual change from commencement to completion of treatment was calculated. The duration of episode from first visit to discharge, adverse events and percentage of patients who achieved acceptable visual outcomes following only six to eight weeks of occlusion, were also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 31.8.16 and 01.09.19, 1,100 patients were discharged, of which 174 had completed amblyopia treatment and fit the inclusion criteria for the audit. Results show no statistically significant difference between current and previous VA outcomes for each type of amblyopia. The majority of patients (60%) achieve a VA outcome of ≤0.250 (logMAR) in the amblyopic eye. This is comparable to the previous audit where 59% of patients achieved a VA outcome of ≤0.250. Most patients still achieve a level of VA which is equal or almost equal to the fellow eye following amblyopia treatment. Treatment is still completed within a two-year period for the majority of patients (62%). There was only one adverse event and this related to atropine occlusion. Only 18 out of the 174 (10%) patients showed that occlusion could be discontinued following just six to eight weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of amblyopia in the NEC is as successful as found in the previous audit and the current amblyopia treatment protocol remains effective. Only 10% of patients achieved the appropriate VA for amblyopia treatment to be ceased on their first return visit. This indicates that the follow-up length for patients undergoing amblyopia treatment could be extended beyond six to eight weeks without causing a detriment to VA outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"127-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10742088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对纽卡斯尔眼科中心(NEC)的弱视治疗效果进行审核,以确定目前的视力(VA)结果与 2011-12 年度审核结果的比较情况:方法:回顾性数据库审查。将2016年8月31日至19年9月1日期间出院的接受过各向异性、斜视和混合性弱视治疗的患者的视力结果与上一次审核中发现的视力结果进行比较。上一次审核对11年1月1日至12年12月31日期间开始接受弱视治疗的患者进行了复查。采用非配对T检验来评估结果是否与之前发现的结果存在显著的统计学差异。计算了从开始治疗到完成治疗的视力变化比例。此外,还分析了从首次就诊到出院的持续时间、不良事件以及仅经过六到八周的闭塞治疗就达到可接受视觉效果的患者比例:16年8月31日至19年9月1日期间,共有1100名患者出院,其中174人已完成弱视治疗并符合审计的纳入标准。结果显示,每种弱视类型目前的VA结果与之前的VA结果在统计学上没有明显差异。大多数患者(60%)的弱视眼视力达到≤0.250(logMAR)。这与之前的审核结果相当,当时59%的患者视力达到了≤0.250。大多数患者在接受弱视治疗后,其视力仍能达到或几乎达到同侧眼的视力水平。大多数患者(62%)仍能在两年内完成治疗。只有一起不良事件与阿托品闭塞有关。在174名患者中,只有18名患者(10%)在接受6至8周的治疗后可以停止闭塞:结论:NEC 的弱视治疗与之前的审计结果一样成功,目前的弱视治疗方案仍然有效。只有10%的患者达到了适当的视力水平,可以在首次回访时停止弱视治疗。这表明,接受弱视治疗的患者的随访时间可延长至六至八周以上,而不会对视力结果造成损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amblyopia Treatment Outcomes Re-Audit, Comparing Current Outcomes to Those from the 2011-12 Audit.

Aim: An audit of the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment in the Newcastle Eye Centre (NEC) to determine how current visual acuity (VA) outcomes compare to those found in the 2011-12 audit.

Methods: A retrospective database review. VA outcomes of patients who had undergone treatment for anisometropic, strabismic and mixed amblyopia; discharged between 31.08.2016 - 01.09.19, were compared with VA outcomes found in the previous audit. The previous audit reviewed patients commencing amblyopia treatment during 1.1.11-31.12.12.An unpaired T-test was used to assess if results were statistically significantly different to those found previously. Proportion of visual change from commencement to completion of treatment was calculated. The duration of episode from first visit to discharge, adverse events and percentage of patients who achieved acceptable visual outcomes following only six to eight weeks of occlusion, were also analysed.

Results: Between 31.8.16 and 01.09.19, 1,100 patients were discharged, of which 174 had completed amblyopia treatment and fit the inclusion criteria for the audit. Results show no statistically significant difference between current and previous VA outcomes for each type of amblyopia. The majority of patients (60%) achieve a VA outcome of ≤0.250 (logMAR) in the amblyopic eye. This is comparable to the previous audit where 59% of patients achieved a VA outcome of ≤0.250. Most patients still achieve a level of VA which is equal or almost equal to the fellow eye following amblyopia treatment. Treatment is still completed within a two-year period for the majority of patients (62%). There was only one adverse event and this related to atropine occlusion. Only 18 out of the 174 (10%) patients showed that occlusion could be discontinued following just six to eight weeks of treatment.

Conclusions: The treatment of amblyopia in the NEC is as successful as found in the previous audit and the current amblyopia treatment protocol remains effective. Only 10% of patients achieved the appropriate VA for amblyopia treatment to be ceased on their first return visit. This indicates that the follow-up length for patients undergoing amblyopia treatment could be extended beyond six to eight weeks without causing a detriment to VA outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信