Liang-dan Tu , Peng-cheng Li , Yu Zhao , Rui-zhi Feng , Jian-qin Lv
{"title":"经皮穴位电刺激治疗开颅手术患者术后恶心呕吐:随机对照试验","authors":"Liang-dan Tu , Peng-cheng Li , Yu Zhao , Rui-zhi Feng , Jian-qin Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy<span><span> is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) </span>acupoint<span> stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting<span> (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and </span>analgesics at 0–2, 2–6, and 6–24 h after craniotomy were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 0–2 and 6–24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 2–6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0–2 and 2–6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 6–24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Liang-dan Tu , Peng-cheng Li , Yu Zhao , Rui-zhi Feng , Jian-qin Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy<span><span> is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) </span>acupoint<span> stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting<span> (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and </span>analgesics at 0–2, 2–6, and 6–24 h after craniotomy were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 0–2 and 6–24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 2–6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0–2 and 2–6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 6–24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123001056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123001056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial
Background
The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) acupoint stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.
Materials and methods
This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and analgesics at 0–2, 2–6, and 6–24 h after craniotomy were assessed.
Results
The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 0–2 and 6–24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 2–6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0–2 and 2–6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 6–24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P > 0.05).
Conclusion
TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.
期刊介绍:
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.