经皮穴位电刺激治疗开颅手术患者术后恶心呕吐:随机对照试验

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Liang-dan Tu , Peng-cheng Li , Yu Zhao , Rui-zhi Feng , Jian-qin Lv
{"title":"经皮穴位电刺激治疗开颅手术患者术后恶心呕吐:随机对照试验","authors":"Liang-dan Tu ,&nbsp;Peng-cheng Li ,&nbsp;Yu Zhao ,&nbsp;Rui-zhi Feng ,&nbsp;Jian-qin Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy<span><span> is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) </span>acupoint<span> stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting<span> (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and </span>analgesics at 0–2, 2–6, and 6–24 h after craniotomy were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). During 0–2 and 6–24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). During 2–6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0–2 and 2–6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). During 6–24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Liang-dan Tu ,&nbsp;Peng-cheng Li ,&nbsp;Yu Zhao ,&nbsp;Rui-zhi Feng ,&nbsp;Jian-qin Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy<span><span> is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) </span>acupoint<span> stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting<span> (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and </span>analgesics at 0–2, 2–6, and 6–24 h after craniotomy were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). During 0–2 and 6–24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). During 2–6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0–2 and 2–6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). During 6–24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123001056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388123001056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:开颅手术后恶心和呕吐的发生率很高,心包经6(P6;内关)穴位刺激是治疗术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的重要策略。在此,我们旨在评估经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)作为止吐药的辅助疗法对预防开颅手术后 PONV 的疗效。入组患者被随机分配到 TEAS 组或假 TEAS 组。对开颅手术后 0-2、2-6 和 6-24 h 的 PONV 发生率、疼痛评分以及术后止吐药和镇痛药的补救治疗进行了评估。结果两组患者的特征无显著差异(P> 0.05)。开颅手术后 0-2 小时和 6-24 小时内,两组患者的呕吐发生率无明显差异(P > 0.05)。在 2-6 小时内,假 TEAS 组的呕吐发生率高于 TEAS 组(29.3% 对 14.0%,P = 0.047)。在 0-2 小时和 2-6 小时期间,两组的疼痛评分没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。开颅手术后 6-24 小时内,假 TEAS 组的疼痛评分明显高于 TEAS 组(P = 0.001)。结论 开颅手术后 P6 阶段的 TEAS 可降低呕吐发生率和疼痛评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial

Background

The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) acupoint stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.

Materials and methods

This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and analgesics at 0–2, 2–6, and 6–24 h after craniotomy were assessed.

Results

The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 0–2 and 6–24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 2–6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0–2 and 2–6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 6–24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信