急诊科就诊患者中与药物相关急诊的临床概况:观察研究

IF 0.4 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Srilatha Yagadi, R. Guguloth, Mathews Jacob
{"title":"急诊科就诊患者中与药物相关急诊的临床概况:观察研究","authors":"Srilatha Yagadi, R. Guguloth, Mathews Jacob","doi":"10.4103/2221-6189.390386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To determine the clinical profile of patients presenting with medication-related emergencies to the Emergency Department of our institute.\n \n \n \n This was an observational study conducted between November 2018 and September 2020 at Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Karnataka. A total of 138 subjects who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The severity of adverse drug reactions (ADR) is assessed based on the Hurwitz severity assessment scale of ADR. Glasgow coma scale at the time of presentation and source of medication were noted. The type of drug overdose, requirement of advanced airway and vasopressors, and the outcome were also assessed.\n \n \n \n Among medication-related emergencies (n=138) in our study, ADR contributed to 70.3% (n=97) of the study population, and drug overdose accounted for 29.7% (n=41). One-third of the ADR occurred in patients aged above 60 years. Most patients were hemodynamically stable and did not require vasopressors, or advanced airway in both groups. Most patients had Glasgow coma scale ranging from 13-15 in both groups. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most used medicine (17/41, 41.5%) and most medications were over the counter drugs (25/41, 61.0%) in the drug overdose group; meanwhile in the ADR group, anti-diabetic medication was the most used medicine (34/97, 35.1%) and most medications were prescribed in the ADR group (93/97, 95.9%).\n \n \n \n Our study shows that ADR is the most common type of medication-related emergency.\n","PeriodicalId":45984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Disease","volume":"673 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical profile of medication-related emergencies among patients presenting to the emergency department: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"Srilatha Yagadi, R. Guguloth, Mathews Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2221-6189.390386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To determine the clinical profile of patients presenting with medication-related emergencies to the Emergency Department of our institute.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was an observational study conducted between November 2018 and September 2020 at Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Karnataka. A total of 138 subjects who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The severity of adverse drug reactions (ADR) is assessed based on the Hurwitz severity assessment scale of ADR. Glasgow coma scale at the time of presentation and source of medication were noted. The type of drug overdose, requirement of advanced airway and vasopressors, and the outcome were also assessed.\\n \\n \\n \\n Among medication-related emergencies (n=138) in our study, ADR contributed to 70.3% (n=97) of the study population, and drug overdose accounted for 29.7% (n=41). One-third of the ADR occurred in patients aged above 60 years. Most patients were hemodynamically stable and did not require vasopressors, or advanced airway in both groups. Most patients had Glasgow coma scale ranging from 13-15 in both groups. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most used medicine (17/41, 41.5%) and most medications were over the counter drugs (25/41, 61.0%) in the drug overdose group; meanwhile in the ADR group, anti-diabetic medication was the most used medicine (34/97, 35.1%) and most medications were prescribed in the ADR group (93/97, 95.9%).\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study shows that ADR is the most common type of medication-related emergency.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Disease\",\"volume\":\"673 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.390386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.390386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在本院急诊科就诊的药物相关急症患者的临床特征。 这是一项观察性研究,于 2018 年 11 月至 2020 年 9 月期间在卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔浸信会医院进行。共有 138 名符合纳入标准的受试者被纳入研究。药物不良反应(ADR)的严重程度根据Hurwitz药物不良反应严重程度评估量表进行评估。研究人员还记录了患者发病时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表和药物来源。此外,还评估了药物过量的类型、对先进气道和血管加压剂的需求以及结果。 在我们的研究中,与药物相关的急症(138 例)中,药物不良反应占研究人数的 70.3%(97 例),药物过量占 29.7%(41 例)。三分之一的 ADR 发生在 60 岁以上的患者身上。大多数患者血流动力学稳定,两组患者均无需使用血管加压剂或高级气道。两组患者的格拉斯哥昏迷量表均为 13-15 分。在药物过量组中,非甾体类抗炎药是使用最多的药物(17/41,41.5%),大多数药物为非处方药(25/41,61.0%);而在 ADR 组中,抗糖尿病药物是使用最多的药物(34/97,35.1%),大多数药物为 ADR 组的处方药(93/97,95.9%)。 我们的研究表明,ADR 是最常见的药物相关急症类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical profile of medication-related emergencies among patients presenting to the emergency department: An observational study
To determine the clinical profile of patients presenting with medication-related emergencies to the Emergency Department of our institute. This was an observational study conducted between November 2018 and September 2020 at Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Karnataka. A total of 138 subjects who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The severity of adverse drug reactions (ADR) is assessed based on the Hurwitz severity assessment scale of ADR. Glasgow coma scale at the time of presentation and source of medication were noted. The type of drug overdose, requirement of advanced airway and vasopressors, and the outcome were also assessed. Among medication-related emergencies (n=138) in our study, ADR contributed to 70.3% (n=97) of the study population, and drug overdose accounted for 29.7% (n=41). One-third of the ADR occurred in patients aged above 60 years. Most patients were hemodynamically stable and did not require vasopressors, or advanced airway in both groups. Most patients had Glasgow coma scale ranging from 13-15 in both groups. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most used medicine (17/41, 41.5%) and most medications were over the counter drugs (25/41, 61.0%) in the drug overdose group; meanwhile in the ADR group, anti-diabetic medication was the most used medicine (34/97, 35.1%) and most medications were prescribed in the ADR group (93/97, 95.9%). Our study shows that ADR is the most common type of medication-related emergency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acute Disease
Journal of Acute Disease CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
652
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The articles published mainly deal with pre-hospital and hospital emergency medicine, cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation, critical cardiovascular disease, sepsis, severe infection, multiple organ failure, acute and critical diseases in different medical fields, sudden cardiac arrest, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), critical care medicine, disaster rescue medicine (earthquakes, fires, floods, mine disaster, air crash, et al.), acute trauma, acute toxicology, acute heart disease, and related topics. JAD sets up columns for special subjects in each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信