教育紧急状况下学科评估重组的探索性研究--意大利案例

M. Eradze, Andrea Tinterri, Amma Di pace, Delio De Martino
{"title":"教育紧急状况下学科评估重组的探索性研究--意大利案例","authors":"M. Eradze, Andrea Tinterri, Amma Di pace, Delio De Martino","doi":"10.2478/rem-2023-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A coronavirus disease (COVID)-related educational emergency is believed to have changed some of the aspects of the educational landscape. Sudden changes to traditional structures that are schools are undoubtedly an interesting issue to explore: complex phenomena such as assessment methods are highly related to many different factors such as normative base, the use of technological tools, etc. This article reports on the reorganization of assessment methods in the context of a rapid and forced transition to remote teaching mode, based on the results of a survey of Italian teachers. Findings indicate that pandemic-related educational emergency and the push toward the use of tools in teaching and learning practices, and the corresponding relaxation of certain established frames of operation, have created grounds for alternative forms of assessment. Results show that when entertaining different options and enjoying some level of autonomy, teachers can explore alternative forms of assessment. Assessment methods also change according to school subjects; while assessment changes are discipline specific, there is a clear trend toward product-based assessment.","PeriodicalId":55657,"journal":{"name":"Research on Education and Media","volume":"70 ","pages":"25 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An explorative study of discipline-specific reorganization of assessment during educational emergency – An Italian case\",\"authors\":\"M. Eradze, Andrea Tinterri, Amma Di pace, Delio De Martino\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rem-2023-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A coronavirus disease (COVID)-related educational emergency is believed to have changed some of the aspects of the educational landscape. Sudden changes to traditional structures that are schools are undoubtedly an interesting issue to explore: complex phenomena such as assessment methods are highly related to many different factors such as normative base, the use of technological tools, etc. This article reports on the reorganization of assessment methods in the context of a rapid and forced transition to remote teaching mode, based on the results of a survey of Italian teachers. Findings indicate that pandemic-related educational emergency and the push toward the use of tools in teaching and learning practices, and the corresponding relaxation of certain established frames of operation, have created grounds for alternative forms of assessment. Results show that when entertaining different options and enjoying some level of autonomy, teachers can explore alternative forms of assessment. Assessment methods also change according to school subjects; while assessment changes are discipline specific, there is a clear trend toward product-based assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Education and Media\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"25 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Education and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2023-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Education and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2023-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 与冠状病毒疾病(COVID)有关的教育紧急事件被认为改变了教育的某些方面。学校传统结构的突然改变无疑是一个值得探讨的问题:评估方法等复杂现象与许多不同的因素高度相关,如规范基础、技术工具的使用等。本文根据对意大利教师的调查结果,报告了在快速被迫过渡到远程教学模式的背景下,评估方法的重组情况。调查结果表明,与大流行病相关的教育紧急状况和在教学实践中使用工具的推动,以及对某些既定操作框架的相应放宽,为替代评估形式创造了条件。结果表明,当教师有不同的选择并享有一定程度的自主权时,他们可以探索其他的评估方式。评估方法也会因学校学科的不同而发生变化;虽然评估的变化是因学科而异的,但以产品为基础的评估是一个明显的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An explorative study of discipline-specific reorganization of assessment during educational emergency – An Italian case
Abstract A coronavirus disease (COVID)-related educational emergency is believed to have changed some of the aspects of the educational landscape. Sudden changes to traditional structures that are schools are undoubtedly an interesting issue to explore: complex phenomena such as assessment methods are highly related to many different factors such as normative base, the use of technological tools, etc. This article reports on the reorganization of assessment methods in the context of a rapid and forced transition to remote teaching mode, based on the results of a survey of Italian teachers. Findings indicate that pandemic-related educational emergency and the push toward the use of tools in teaching and learning practices, and the corresponding relaxation of certain established frames of operation, have created grounds for alternative forms of assessment. Results show that when entertaining different options and enjoying some level of autonomy, teachers can explore alternative forms of assessment. Assessment methods also change according to school subjects; while assessment changes are discipline specific, there is a clear trend toward product-based assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信