变性男性/非二元性别者在接受性别确认手术后的生育力保存选择和决策遗憾

Austin Johnson M.D. , Asha B. McClurg M.D., M.S.C.R. , Janine Baldino M.D. , Rajeshree Das B.A. , Erin T. Carey M.D., M.S.C.R.
{"title":"变性男性/非二元性别者在接受性别确认手术后的生育力保存选择和决策遗憾","authors":"Austin Johnson M.D. ,&nbsp;Asha B. McClurg M.D., M.S.C.R. ,&nbsp;Janine Baldino M.D. ,&nbsp;Rajeshree Das B.A. ,&nbsp;Erin T. Carey M.D., M.S.C.R.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices after gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University-based pratice.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>A total of 57 survey respondents identifying as transgender men or gender nonbinary with a history of gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs between 2014 and 2023 with the University of North Carolina Minimally Invasive Gynecology division.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Survey or questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The prevalence and severity of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices were measured with the use of the validated decisional regret scale (DRS) (scored 0–100). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers to pursuing reproductive endocrinology and infertility consultation and fertility preservation treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey response rate was 50.9% (57/112). “Mild” to “severe” decisional regret was reported by 38.6% (n = 22) of survey respondents, with DRS scores among all respondents ranging from 0–85. Higher median DRS scores were associated with patient-reported inadequacy of preoperative fertility counseling regarding implications of surgery on future fertility or family-building (0 vs. 50) and fertility preservation options (0 vs. 12.5). No desire for future fertility at the time of fertility counseling was the most frequent reason (68.4%) for declining a referral to reproductive endocrinology and infertility for additional fertility preservation discussion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001344/pdfft?md5=df43680816e9ca23df71ee2278096986&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334123001344-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertility preservation choices and decisional regret after gender-affirming surgery in transgender men or gender nonbinary persons\",\"authors\":\"Austin Johnson M.D. ,&nbsp;Asha B. McClurg M.D., M.S.C.R. ,&nbsp;Janine Baldino M.D. ,&nbsp;Rajeshree Das B.A. ,&nbsp;Erin T. Carey M.D., M.S.C.R.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices after gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University-based pratice.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>A total of 57 survey respondents identifying as transgender men or gender nonbinary with a history of gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs between 2014 and 2023 with the University of North Carolina Minimally Invasive Gynecology division.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Survey or questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The prevalence and severity of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices were measured with the use of the validated decisional regret scale (DRS) (scored 0–100). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers to pursuing reproductive endocrinology and infertility consultation and fertility preservation treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey response rate was 50.9% (57/112). “Mild” to “severe” decisional regret was reported by 38.6% (n = 22) of survey respondents, with DRS scores among all respondents ranging from 0–85. Higher median DRS scores were associated with patient-reported inadequacy of preoperative fertility counseling regarding implications of surgery on future fertility or family-building (0 vs. 50) and fertility preservation options (0 vs. 12.5). No desire for future fertility at the time of fertility counseling was the most frequent reason (68.4%) for declining a referral to reproductive endocrinology and infertility for additional fertility preservation discussion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 87-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001344/pdfft?md5=df43680816e9ca23df71ee2278096986&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334123001344-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标调查性别确认手术或生殖器官切除术后对术前生育力保留选择的决定性后悔的普遍程度。患者在2014年至2023年期间在北卡罗来纳大学微创妇科接受过性别确认手术或生殖器官切除术的变性男性或性别非二元性调查对象共57人。干预措施调查或问卷调查。主要结果测量使用有效的决策后悔量表(DRS)(评分 0-100)测量术前生育力保留选择决策后悔的普遍性和严重程度。次要结果包括患者报告的进行生殖内分泌与不孕症咨询和生育力保存治疗的障碍。结果调查回复率为 50.9%(57/112)。38.6%(n = 22)的受访者报告了 "轻度 "至 "重度 "的决策后悔,所有受访者的 DRS 得分为 0-85 分。中位数 DRS 分数较高与患者报告的术前生育咨询不足有关,即手术对未来生育或建立家庭的影响(0 vs. 50)和生育力保存选择(0 vs. 12.5)。在接受生育咨询时对未来生育没有愿望是拒绝转诊到生殖内分泌和不孕不育科进行更多生育力保存讨论的最常见原因(68.4%)。结论 变性男性或性别非二元者在接受性别确认手术或切除生殖器官后,会对术前生育力保存选择感到后悔。应提供以患者为中心的术前生育咨询和生育力保存治疗,以降低未来后悔的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fertility preservation choices and decisional regret after gender-affirming surgery in transgender men or gender nonbinary persons

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices after gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

University-based pratice.

Patients

A total of 57 survey respondents identifying as transgender men or gender nonbinary with a history of gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs between 2014 and 2023 with the University of North Carolina Minimally Invasive Gynecology division.

Intervention

Survey or questionnaire.

Main Outcome Measures

The prevalence and severity of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices were measured with the use of the validated decisional regret scale (DRS) (scored 0–100). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers to pursuing reproductive endocrinology and infertility consultation and fertility preservation treatment.

Results

The survey response rate was 50.9% (57/112). “Mild” to “severe” decisional regret was reported by 38.6% (n = 22) of survey respondents, with DRS scores among all respondents ranging from 0–85. Higher median DRS scores were associated with patient-reported inadequacy of preoperative fertility counseling regarding implications of surgery on future fertility or family-building (0 vs. 50) and fertility preservation options (0 vs. 12.5). No desire for future fertility at the time of fertility counseling was the most frequent reason (68.4%) for declining a referral to reproductive endocrinology and infertility for additional fertility preservation discussion.

Conclusions

Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信