Carmen Fernández-Cedrón Bermejo, Elena Sánchez Fernández, María Costales Marcos, Faustino José Núñez Batalla, José Luis Llorente Pendás, Justo Ramón Gómez Martínez
{"title":"骨结合 Ponto® 模型植入物的微创 Ponto 手术 (MIPS) 技术与保留组织的线性切口的比较","authors":"Carmen Fernández-Cedrón Bermejo, Elena Sánchez Fernández, María Costales Marcos, Faustino José Núñez Batalla, José Luis Llorente Pendás, Justo Ramón Gómez Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The surgery of osseointegrated implants has undergone different modifications over the years with the aim of achieving better results and facilitating the surgical technique. Today the most commonly used technique is the linear incision with tissue preservation and placement of the abutment and implant. The long-term success of this technique has served as the basis for the development of the so-called minimally invasive surgical approach (MIPS). This study compares the short-, medium- and long-term results between the classic linear incision technique and the MIPS technique.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted on patients who had an osseointegrated implant placed between February 2016 and February 2020. A total of 59 surgeries were performed, 32 surgeries according to the linear incision technique with tissue preservation and 27 with MIPS technique. Outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month and 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statistically significant differences were achieved between the two groups at 1 week after surgery. Eighty percent of the MIPS patients had Holgers grades 0–1 compared to 35% of the linear technique patients (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed at 1 month (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.457) and 1 year (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.228). One case with grade 4 was recorded which resulted in implant extrusion one month after surgery with the MIPS technique. A new osseointegrated implant was placed 2 months after the fall using the same MIPS technique with good results. We were also able to verify that the duration of surgery was much shorter with the MIPS technique and better tolerated in terms of postoperative discomfort by the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our experience, the MIPS technique is the technique of choice for surgery of osseointegrated Ponto model implants as it is simpler, faster and presents fewer problems in the immediate postoperative period, with similar long-term postoperative results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 4","pages":"Pages 210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación técnica Minimal Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) versus incisión lineal con preservación de tejidos en los implantes osteointegrados modelo Ponto®\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Fernández-Cedrón Bermejo, Elena Sánchez Fernández, María Costales Marcos, Faustino José Núñez Batalla, José Luis Llorente Pendás, Justo Ramón Gómez Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The surgery of osseointegrated implants has undergone different modifications over the years with the aim of achieving better results and facilitating the surgical technique. Today the most commonly used technique is the linear incision with tissue preservation and placement of the abutment and implant. The long-term success of this technique has served as the basis for the development of the so-called minimally invasive surgical approach (MIPS). This study compares the short-, medium- and long-term results between the classic linear incision technique and the MIPS technique.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted on patients who had an osseointegrated implant placed between February 2016 and February 2020. A total of 59 surgeries were performed, 32 surgeries according to the linear incision technique with tissue preservation and 27 with MIPS technique. Outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month and 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statistically significant differences were achieved between the two groups at 1 week after surgery. Eighty percent of the MIPS patients had Holgers grades 0–1 compared to 35% of the linear technique patients (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed at 1 month (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.457) and 1 year (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.228). One case with grade 4 was recorded which resulted in implant extrusion one month after surgery with the MIPS technique. A new osseointegrated implant was placed 2 months after the fall using the same MIPS technique with good results. We were also able to verify that the duration of surgery was much shorter with the MIPS technique and better tolerated in terms of postoperative discomfort by the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our experience, the MIPS technique is the technique of choice for surgery of osseointegrated Ponto model implants as it is simpler, faster and presents fewer problems in the immediate postoperative period, with similar long-term postoperative results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 210-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparación técnica Minimal Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) versus incisión lineal con preservación de tejidos en los implantes osteointegrados modelo Ponto®
Background and objectives
The surgery of osseointegrated implants has undergone different modifications over the years with the aim of achieving better results and facilitating the surgical technique. Today the most commonly used technique is the linear incision with tissue preservation and placement of the abutment and implant. The long-term success of this technique has served as the basis for the development of the so-called minimally invasive surgical approach (MIPS). This study compares the short-, medium- and long-term results between the classic linear incision technique and the MIPS technique.
Material and methods
A prospective study was conducted on patients who had an osseointegrated implant placed between February 2016 and February 2020. A total of 59 surgeries were performed, 32 surgeries according to the linear incision technique with tissue preservation and 27 with MIPS technique. Outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month and 1 year.
Results
Statistically significant differences were achieved between the two groups at 1 week after surgery. Eighty percent of the MIPS patients had Holgers grades 0–1 compared to 35% of the linear technique patients (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed at 1 month (p = 0.457) and 1 year (p = 0.228). One case with grade 4 was recorded which resulted in implant extrusion one month after surgery with the MIPS technique. A new osseointegrated implant was placed 2 months after the fall using the same MIPS technique with good results. We were also able to verify that the duration of surgery was much shorter with the MIPS technique and better tolerated in terms of postoperative discomfort by the patient.
Conclusions
In our experience, the MIPS technique is the technique of choice for surgery of osseointegrated Ponto model implants as it is simpler, faster and presents fewer problems in the immediate postoperative period, with similar long-term postoperative results.
期刊介绍:
Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.