疼痛评分是绝经后类风湿性关节炎患者发生脆性骨折的预测因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ichiro Yoshii , Naoya Sawada , Tatsumi Chijiwa
{"title":"疼痛评分是绝经后类风湿性关节炎患者发生脆性骨折的预测因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"Ichiro Yoshii ,&nbsp;Naoya Sawada ,&nbsp;Tatsumi Chijiwa","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P &lt; 0.001) and 0.616 (P &lt; 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS &gt; COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS &gt; COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain score as a predictor of subsequent fragility fracture in postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Ichiro Yoshii ,&nbsp;Naoya Sawada ,&nbsp;Tatsumi Chijiwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afos.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P &lt; 0.001) and 0.616 (P &lt; 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS &gt; COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS &gt; COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 150-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525523001139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525523001139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain score as a predictor of subsequent fragility fracture in postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective case-control study

Objectives

Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF).

Methods

Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test.

Results

A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P < 0.001) and 0.616 (P < 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS > COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS > COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI.

Conclusions

The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信