Daryl Jones BSc Hons, MB BS, FRACP, FCICM, MD, PhD , Kartik Kishore MSc Data Science , Glenn Eastwood RN, BN, BNHons GDipNurs CritCare, PhD , Stephanie K. Sprogis RN, BN, MuNrsPrac, PhD , Neil J. Glassford BSc, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FCICM
{"title":"澳大利亚一家医院违反医前急救小组呼叫标准的情况","authors":"Daryl Jones BSc Hons, MB BS, FRACP, FCICM, MD, PhD , Kartik Kishore MSc Data Science , Glenn Eastwood RN, BN, BNHons GDipNurs CritCare, PhD , Stephanie K. Sprogis RN, BN, MuNrsPrac, PhD , Neil J. Glassford BSc, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FCICM","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives and outcomes</h3><p>To evaluate the 24hrs before medical emergency team (MET) calls to examine: 1) the frequency, nature, and timing of pre-MET criteria breaches; 2) differences in characteristics and outcomes between patients who did and didn't experience pre-MET breaches.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study November 2020–June 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary referral Australian hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults (≥18 years) experiencing MET calls.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Breaches in pre-MET criteria occurred prior to 1886/2255 (83.6%) MET calls, and 1038/1281 (81.0%) of the first MET calls. Patients with pre-MET breaches were older (median [IQR] 72 [57–81] vs 66 [56–77] yrs), more likely to be admitted from home (87.8% vs 81.9%) and via the emergency department (73.0% vs 50.2%), but less likely to be for full resuscitation after (67.3% vs 76.5%) the MET. The three most common pre-MET breaches were low SpO<sub>2</sub> (48.0%), high pulse rate (39.8%), and low systolic blood pressure (29.0%) which were present for a median (IQR) of 15.4 (7.5–20.8), 13.2 (4.3–21.0), and 12.6 (3.5–20.1) hrs before the MET call, respectively. Patients with pre-MET breaches were more likely to need intensive care admission within 24 h (15.6 vs 11.9%), have repeat MET calls (33.3 vs 24.7%), and die in hospital (15.8 vs 9.9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Four-fifths of MET calls were preceded by pre-MET criteria breaches, which were present for many hours. Such patients were older, had more limits of treatment, and experienced worse outcomes. There is a need to improve goals of care documentation and pre-MET management of clinical deterioration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223022251/pdfft?md5=49d96d5a66bdf44a262331a16cc3fe49&pid=1-s2.0-S1441277223022251-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaches of pre-medical emergency team call criteria in an Australian hospital\",\"authors\":\"Daryl Jones BSc Hons, MB BS, FRACP, FCICM, MD, PhD , Kartik Kishore MSc Data Science , Glenn Eastwood RN, BN, BNHons GDipNurs CritCare, PhD , Stephanie K. Sprogis RN, BN, MuNrsPrac, PhD , Neil J. Glassford BSc, MBChB, PhD, MRCP, FCICM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives and outcomes</h3><p>To evaluate the 24hrs before medical emergency team (MET) calls to examine: 1) the frequency, nature, and timing of pre-MET criteria breaches; 2) differences in characteristics and outcomes between patients who did and didn't experience pre-MET breaches.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study November 2020–June 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary referral Australian hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults (≥18 years) experiencing MET calls.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Breaches in pre-MET criteria occurred prior to 1886/2255 (83.6%) MET calls, and 1038/1281 (81.0%) of the first MET calls. Patients with pre-MET breaches were older (median [IQR] 72 [57–81] vs 66 [56–77] yrs), more likely to be admitted from home (87.8% vs 81.9%) and via the emergency department (73.0% vs 50.2%), but less likely to be for full resuscitation after (67.3% vs 76.5%) the MET. The three most common pre-MET breaches were low SpO<sub>2</sub> (48.0%), high pulse rate (39.8%), and low systolic blood pressure (29.0%) which were present for a median (IQR) of 15.4 (7.5–20.8), 13.2 (4.3–21.0), and 12.6 (3.5–20.1) hrs before the MET call, respectively. Patients with pre-MET breaches were more likely to need intensive care admission within 24 h (15.6 vs 11.9%), have repeat MET calls (33.3 vs 24.7%), and die in hospital (15.8 vs 9.9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Four-fifths of MET calls were preceded by pre-MET criteria breaches, which were present for many hours. Such patients were older, had more limits of treatment, and experienced worse outcomes. There is a need to improve goals of care documentation and pre-MET management of clinical deterioration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 223-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223022251/pdfft?md5=49d96d5a66bdf44a262331a16cc3fe49&pid=1-s2.0-S1441277223022251-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223022251\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223022251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标和结果评估医疗急救小组(MET)呼叫前 24 小时的情况,以检查:1)违反 MET 前标准的频率、性质和时间;2)违反和未违反 MET 前标准的患者的特征和结果差异:1)违反 MET 前标准的频率、性质和时间;2)违反和未违反 MET 前标准的患者在特征和预后方面的差异。结果1886/2255(83.6%)次 MET 呼叫前违反了 MET 前标准,1038/1281(81.0%)次首次 MET 呼叫前违反了 MET 前标准。违反 MET 前标准的患者年龄较大(中位数 [IQR] 72 [57-81] 岁 vs 66 [56-77] 岁),更有可能从家中(87.8% vs 81.9%)或通过急诊科(73.0% vs 50.2%)入院,但在 MET 后(67.3% vs 76.5%)进行全面复苏的可能性较小。MET 前最常见的三种失常情况是 SpO2 低(48.0%)、脉搏率高(39.8%)和收缩压低(29.0%),分别出现在 MET 呼叫前 15.4 小时(7.5-20.8)、13.2 小时(4.3-21.0)和 12.6 小时(3.5-20.1)。五分之四的 MET 呼叫在呼叫前就已违反了 MET 标准,且已持续多小时。这些患者年龄较大,治疗限制较多,预后较差。有必要改进护理目标记录和 MET 前的临床恶化管理。
Breaches of pre-medical emergency team call criteria in an Australian hospital
Objectives and outcomes
To evaluate the 24hrs before medical emergency team (MET) calls to examine: 1) the frequency, nature, and timing of pre-MET criteria breaches; 2) differences in characteristics and outcomes between patients who did and didn't experience pre-MET breaches.
Design
Retrospective observational study November 2020–June 2021.
Setting
Tertiary referral Australian hospital.
Participants
Adults (≥18 years) experiencing MET calls.
Results
Breaches in pre-MET criteria occurred prior to 1886/2255 (83.6%) MET calls, and 1038/1281 (81.0%) of the first MET calls. Patients with pre-MET breaches were older (median [IQR] 72 [57–81] vs 66 [56–77] yrs), more likely to be admitted from home (87.8% vs 81.9%) and via the emergency department (73.0% vs 50.2%), but less likely to be for full resuscitation after (67.3% vs 76.5%) the MET. The three most common pre-MET breaches were low SpO2 (48.0%), high pulse rate (39.8%), and low systolic blood pressure (29.0%) which were present for a median (IQR) of 15.4 (7.5–20.8), 13.2 (4.3–21.0), and 12.6 (3.5–20.1) hrs before the MET call, respectively. Patients with pre-MET breaches were more likely to need intensive care admission within 24 h (15.6 vs 11.9%), have repeat MET calls (33.3 vs 24.7%), and die in hospital (15.8 vs 9.9%).
Conclusions
Four-fifths of MET calls were preceded by pre-MET criteria breaches, which were present for many hours. Such patients were older, had more limits of treatment, and experienced worse outcomes. There is a need to improve goals of care documentation and pre-MET management of clinical deterioration.
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.